evince
Truthmatters
and when your shits talk all smack about Clinton being Impeached you say what foreskin lips?
If the Senate allows a fair trial...
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
and when your shits talk all smack about Clinton being Impeached you say what foreskin lips?
Into the Night
Verified User
Nope. Not until the articles of impeachment are delivered to the Senate.
She acts like a queen.
She thinks she does.
That is does.
She thinks she does.
He is.
Demonstrated.
Into the Night
Verified User
Please state specifically where in the Constitution he has to hold a trial at all.
Into the Night
Verified User
Irrelevant. Impartiality is not required to sit on a Senate seat, not even for trials of articles of impeachment. Now you openly attack the Senate.
Into the Night
Verified User
Not quite. The Pelosi clowns are still in the center ring of this circus.
Into the Night
Verified User
No. The articles must be delivered to the Senate for their consideration.
Not yet.
Maybe, maybe not. Put away your Holy Entrails.
Nope. The Senate has not yet received the articles of impeachment.
jimmymccready
Verified User
Around 50% of Americans* believe that [IMPOTUS] should be impeached and removed from office, and Trump and his supporters label anybody who has this opinion as "far left." By definition, 50% of a spectrum cannot be on the far left. You can't label a position that is held by more people than do not hold it as an "extreme position."
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...FaviTVBY49v8UaF7nEZ6TZApfRNI3a4aIn6Qa1TWgWk2c
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...FaviTVBY49v8UaF7nEZ6TZApfRNI3a4aIn6Qa1TWgWk2c
Into the Night
Verified User
They are not finished. The articles of impeachment never reached the Senate.
The Senate is not yet received them.
Fine, but it's meaningless until the articles of impeachment are delivered to the Senate.
That they will, if and only if the receive the articles of impeachment to consider.
Into the Night
Verified User
Irrelevance fallacy.
There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution, in the law, or in the rules of either house of Congress that says that.
You are simply asserting it because you feel like it.
She acts like a queen.
She thinks she does.
She is an excellent Speaker...and I think that upsets you.
Good.
You definitely are bothered.
Rest up. You'll feel better.
Trump has been IMPEACHED.
I know...I know...that really bothers you.
Okay...be bothered...and I thank you for showing how bothered you are by posting about it.
In the meantime...Trump HAS BEEN IMPEACHED BY THE HOUSE.
Dems' own witness says Trump not truly impeached unless articles go to Senate
Dems' own witness says Trump not truly impeached unless articles go to Senate
Brooke Singman
By Brooke Singman | Fox News
"Congress leaves for Christmas break without sending articles of impeachment to the Senate
Consider it a twist on the old question about a tree falling in the forest with no one to hear it: If the House adopts articles of impeachment but never sends them to the Senate, is a president truly impeached?
A Harvard law professor, who also served as a Democrat-called impeachment witness, answered with a resounding “no” in a column that speaks to the deep dilemma House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faces as she sits on two articles of impeachment against President Trump.
MCCONNELL: 'IMPASSE' OVER TRUMP IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, AS DEMS DEPART FROM PRECEDENT
Pelosi, D-Calif., is apparently using the delay as leverage to extract favorable terms for a Senate trial. But Noah Feldman wrote for Bloomberg that an “indefinite delay” would pose a “serious problem”—as impeachment only technically happens when the articles are transmitted to the Senate.
“Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial,” Feldman wrote.
“If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president,” he continued. “If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say he wasn’t truly impeached at all.”
Pelosi signaled late Wednesday after the House passed articles of impeachment—on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress—that she wanted reassurances that the Senate would hold a fair trial, likely involving certain Democrat-sought witnesses, before sending over the articles.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on the floor Thursday seemed baffled at Pelosi’s move to withhold the articles, arguing that the House speaker doesn’t have the leverage she thinks she does.
“Some House Democrats imply they are withholding the articles for some kind of leverage,” McConnell said. “I admit, I’m not sure what leverage there is in refraining from sending us something we do not want. Alas, if they can figure that out, they can explain.”
He added: “Following weeks of pronouncements about the urgency of the situation, urgent situation, the prosecutors appear to have developed cold feet. Democrat prosecution seems to have gotten cold feet and be unsure about whether they want to proceed to the trial. Like I said, a very unusual spectacle, and in my view, certainly not one that reflects well on the House.”
foxnews.com
Dems' own witness says Trump not truly impeached unless articles go to Senate
Brooke Singman
By Brooke Singman | Fox News
"Congress leaves for Christmas break without sending articles of impeachment to the Senate
Consider it a twist on the old question about a tree falling in the forest with no one to hear it: If the House adopts articles of impeachment but never sends them to the Senate, is a president truly impeached?
A Harvard law professor, who also served as a Democrat-called impeachment witness, answered with a resounding “no” in a column that speaks to the deep dilemma House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faces as she sits on two articles of impeachment against President Trump.
MCCONNELL: 'IMPASSE' OVER TRUMP IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, AS DEMS DEPART FROM PRECEDENT
Pelosi, D-Calif., is apparently using the delay as leverage to extract favorable terms for a Senate trial. But Noah Feldman wrote for Bloomberg that an “indefinite delay” would pose a “serious problem”—as impeachment only technically happens when the articles are transmitted to the Senate.
“Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial,” Feldman wrote.
“If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president,” he continued. “If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say he wasn’t truly impeached at all.”
Pelosi signaled late Wednesday after the House passed articles of impeachment—on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress—that she wanted reassurances that the Senate would hold a fair trial, likely involving certain Democrat-sought witnesses, before sending over the articles.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on the floor Thursday seemed baffled at Pelosi’s move to withhold the articles, arguing that the House speaker doesn’t have the leverage she thinks she does.
“Some House Democrats imply they are withholding the articles for some kind of leverage,” McConnell said. “I admit, I’m not sure what leverage there is in refraining from sending us something we do not want. Alas, if they can figure that out, they can explain.”
He added: “Following weeks of pronouncements about the urgency of the situation, urgent situation, the prosecutors appear to have developed cold feet. Democrat prosecution seems to have gotten cold feet and be unsure about whether they want to proceed to the trial. Like I said, a very unusual spectacle, and in my view, certainly not one that reflects well on the House.”
foxnews.com
"If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.
That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.
As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message."
bloomberg.com
That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.
As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message."
bloomberg.com
Trump could say "I was not impeached" whether the articles are sent to the Senate or not.
Trump is a serial liar.
He was right about one thing, though, when he said, "The suckers who back me are so fucking stupid, they would continue kissing my ass even if I shot one of them dead on Fifth Avenue in front of television cameras"...
...or words to that effect.
I may have been paraphrasing a bit.
But that was the jist.
Trump is a serial liar.
He was right about one thing, though, when he said, "The suckers who back me are so fucking stupid, they would continue kissing my ass even if I shot one of them dead on Fifth Avenue in front of television cameras"...
...or words to that effect.
I may have been paraphrasing a bit.
But that was the jist.
No he could not. Only if the articles are not sent to Senate. Like now. You may go.
Nope. Not until the articles of impeachment are delivered to the Senate.
She acts like a queen.
She thinks she does.
That is does.
She thinks she does.
He is.
Demonstrated.
Trump was impeached once the vote was recorded and announced. He is impeached. He has not been tried yet. The House found evidence of obstruction and abuse of power. The House impeaches and they did. Now the Senate has to hold a trial.
Why would that be?
Trump obviously attempted to extort President Zelensky...and that rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Plus...he DID attempt to thwart the Houses investigation of him.
If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.
That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.
As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message.
That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.
As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message.