It's ILLEGAL to shoot GAME in several states with an ASSAULT weapon.

Like I told you, in another thread this person would tell you that they are "liberal" and "don't trust government", yet they still want the same people they call "jack booted thugs" when they kill somebody to be the only people legally armed. It isn't about logic, it isn't about how they don't "trust the man", it is solely about control.

Spot on....and it is about POWER. ;)
 
The laughable “technical knowledge” you present is absurd. If first two “fire the same” why is the second one the platform of choice for cops as well as these mass shooters?
Quit trying to bullshit us by presenting them as equal weapons, asswipe.

^^Shit-for-brains thinks he knows what he is bloviating about. Wrong dumb fuck; neither of those weapons are any less dangerous or deadly than the other and fire at the same rate of fire.

But then, you are a lying, repugnant, low IQ moron on steroids.
 
Here in Oklahoma they’ve deer hunted with 15+ round mags full for quite some time. A person doesn’t need it but to each his own. Sometimes if the right (or wrong) group of hunters is behind my house it sounds like a small skirmish when they see a deer.

Here’s what I found concerning shotgun only states...

I think I read somewhere where Iowa has added a rifle season but I’m not certain.

That is because these hunting areas are near homes. Shotgun slugs do not travel a great distance putting others at risk.
 
Some people are always going to use the wrong tool for the wrong job.

You for example - I presume you feel using a flame thrower to kill a mosquito is perfectly reasonable.

Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments. Yay you! :clap:
 
Again, it depends on what you’re hunting. For Coyotes, feral swine and small critters ther are no limitations. For just about everything else high powered rifles are restricted or not legal and give me a break on smooth walled rifles.

^^Another leftist who is clueless regarding firearms. No shocker to me.
 
There is no circumstance in which an AR-15 is useful in hunting absolutely none zero zip zilch

No one asked a leftist moron like you for your opinion shit-for-brains. Back to your padded cell you repugnant little twat.

You should kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

 
The Dayton shooter killed 10 people and injured 27 in under 30 seconds. If that is what your gun does stay the hell away from me because you are the worst hunter on the planet

You should kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

 
you are a moron...

IRONY!!

The Dayton shooter killed 10 people and injured 27 in under 30 seconds. If that is what your gun does stay the hell away from me because you are the worst hunter on the planet

You should kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

 
Well I don't think many States permit automatic rifles for hunting and they certainly aren't ideal for hunting but that doesn't mean you can't.

Automatic rifles are illegal you willful dunce. These are SEMI-AUTOMATIC.

Banning weapons because they look scary is asinine. Much like the arguments you leftist erupt with.
 
From the perspective of sporting and hunting, I can think of exactly zero valid reasons one would have to lug around a high-powered AK-47 with a 30-round ammo clip to hunt deer or wild turkey.

That's fine if you want to go ahead and confess that the only reason is that a beer-gutted Trump lover is compensating and indulging his Rambo fantasies as he stalks around in the woods.

More importantly, there would undoubtedly be a lot of other hunters, fishermen, and hikers who would be uncomfortable or feel unsafe knowing there is a fat ass in the area carrying a high powered rifle with the potential of squeezing off 30 high velocity rounds in a span of seven seconds.

No one gives a shit what a whiny, lying, low IQ leftist moron like you thinks shit-for-brains.

You should kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.
 
You nailed it Damo if it looks scary it must be evil. Which is more deadly.

Y7Bvkwo.jpg


The answer is A as B is a BB gun.

p0sSzVL.jpg


I don't care how 'scary' it looks or DOESN'T look. If this can shoot BULLETs instead of 'water' and kill people in rapid succession without reloading, then I don't give a flying fuck if it is a pink 'girls' version!

09_JoeBiden.w700.h700.jpg
 
That second amendment is out dated and needs changed or deleted.
If the second amendment is on a PDF file it's pretty easy to change. Sometimes you have to replace it to a changeable format though. To delete it just hit the delete tab.
 
All three function and fire at the same rate, dickhead.

Are you now an expert on firearms like you think you are about everything else?

You avoided the question, asswipe.

Why is the second the platform of choice for cops and mass shooters? I understand why that question makes you uncomfortable. :rofl2:
 
I have a hunting rifle, it shoots exactly the same rounds at the same rate, etc. as my AR-15. There is absolutely zero facts in your post, just feels. It looks scary to you, I get that, but this post is just ignorance.

The lame argument that a standard long gun and an AR-15 platform “fire at the same rate” fails. If they are so equivalent, why don’t cops and mass shooters use the former?
 
No one gives a shit what a whiny, lying, low IQ leftist moron like you thinks shit-for-brains.

You should kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

The compulsion of an INCEL wanting to indulge Rambo fantasies does not trump public safety.

There is exactly zero valid reasons from the perspective of hunting or sporting that you need to have a 45 round ammunition clip in a high-powered, semi-automatic assault rifle.

You INCEL gun humpers fought tooth and nail for years against banning bump stocks. Now, everyone except the most deranged gun humper belatedly agrees bump stocks are beyond the pale. I predice that - over the long run - the INCEL compulsion to play Rambo is going to be outweighed by the reasonable need for public safety.
 
Why? Because you say so? How is it outdated?

You do realize you don't have to go squat behind a tree and wipe your ass with a corn shuck now- just to take a shit?

Things have changed and all things have been modernized and improved- now since the 1700's! We have bathrooms with indoor plumbing, toilets, and toilet paper now!

41JPmiQ%2B80L._AC_UL160_.jpg
 
That is because these hunting areas are near homes. Shotgun slugs do not travel a great distance putting others at risk.

Yep...that’s what I indicated concerning straight necked cartridges...post #78. Not hard to figure out to people who know firearms. But still, the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting rifles and where one can or cannot use them.
 
Back
Top