texas court makes new law out of thin air, negates a right of the people

[Into the Night]

^Fucking nutcase. Thinks he’s the 10th Supreme Court Justice.

We’re sure Trump will nominate him very soon.

Lie.

 

[Into the Night]

That fuck is on ignore.

Only you dumbfucks are making any claims about so-called rights. Absurdly irrelevant.

Your claim is they “cannot be necessary”. Still, the stupidest post this forum has ever seen.

Lie.

 

[Into the Night]

Absolute, by definition and in the sense you mentioned, means "having no restriction, exception, or qualification".

You should be careful about using words when you don't know the definition.

If you have a problem with the definition, take it up with Merriam-Webster.

They don't own the word. No dictionary defines any word.

 

[domer76]

How many bags have you eaten since not answering my two questions?

You're a loser. Gets the tough questions and resorts to insults and runs away. You're pathetic.

You posing a tough question, doper?

You can't even fight your way out of a bag of nachos, stoner.

 

[Lord Yurt]

They MAKE it legal.

Do they? How so?

 

[CFM]

They don't own the word. No dictionary defines any word.

They already have whether you accept it not. Last time I looked, you not agreeing nor accepting something didn't change facts.

 

[Lord Yurt]

You posing a tough question, doper?

You can't even fight your way out of a bag of nachos, stoner.

Pardon me while I

What? While you what? You bore me with your old man angry antics that never actually addresses a thread topic. All you are is a bitter old fart who thinks solely insulting people on an internet political board is somehow cool. It makes you feel superior, in some sadistic way.

You're a complete narcissist.

Buy bye loser.....

 

[Lord Yurt]

Did Domer just die? He cut off mid sentence. Maybe he posted after, but I don't care to look and wouldn't shed a tear if he died. Poor Domer, he might be missed.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I'd love to see an explanation on that one, tell us, how have all three branches of Gov't have been actively acting illegally since 1798? And provide examples, not just generalizations

most recently, the ACA. over the last century, major gun control laws, like the NFA, GCA, and FOPA. the baron robber cases, alien and sedition act. that last one didn't take but 6 years before they started ignoring the constitution.

I'm having a difficult time believing that alot of you wholeheartedly have faith in the federal government having never operated outside the bounds of the constitution

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Absolute, by definition and in the sense you mentioned, means "having no restriction, exception, or qualification".

You should be careful about using words when you don't know the definition.

If you have a problem with the definition, take it up with Merriam-Webster.

congrats, you just made the liberals argument for a well regulated militia, you moron.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Please do some research before believing everything you see in memes. The reason the British Empire let America go is because of their war with France.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, all we had to do is sit back and wait!!

 

[Flash]

They are not restrictions on federal power. They clarify restrictions on federal power that were already there. Unless the federal government is specifically given a power, they do not have it!

What specific power is the federal government given that allows Congress to give the president emergency powers or gives the president the power to exercise those powers or issue executive orders?

The federal government can pass no law concerning the press. The 1st amendment clarifies that. The States can pass any kind of law they want concerning the press IF their constitutions give them that authority.

The federal government cannot abridge the free press. The States can.

Until 1931 when the Supreme Court incorporated free press to restrict states in Near v. Minnesota.

No court has the authority to interpret or change the Constitution.

Yes, they do so regularly including striking down state laws as unconstitutional for violating free press.

 

[CFM]

congrats, you just made the liberals argument for a well regulated militia, you moron.

No, I educated a dumbass, dishonorably discharged coward on the definition of a word.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, I educated a dumbass, dishonorably discharged coward on the definition of a word.

your dictionary is broken, because you didn't do anything of the sort, cuckboy

 

[Into the Night]

Do they? How so?

I suggest you study history to see examples of this.

 

[Into the Night]

They already have whether you accept it not. Last time I looked, you not agreeing nor accepting something didn't change facts.

Nope. No dictionary defines any word. No dictionary owns any word. Dictionaries are used to standardize spelling and pronunciation, and give examples of how a word is used, but they do not define any word.

People define words. It's what makes a language 'live' and ever changing. They are used to communicate ideas. People define words, collectively. The study of where a word comes from is a hobby of mine, called etymology.

Some words, like 'science', 'religion', 'reality', etc. are defined by philosophical arguments. Some words are defined as specialist lingo in a trade, a branch of knowledge, or a cultural environment, such as 'mathematics', 'logic', 'volt', 'ampere', 'matrix', or 'liftoff', 'you', 'me', 'food', 'drink'. Some are define as constructs for a language, such as 'and', 'but', 'or', 'because'.

But no dictionary defined any of them. These words existed long before dictionaries themselves, and will exist even if every dictionary was destroyed.

A book is not a language. A language is not a book.

 

[domer76]

What? While you what? You bore me with your old man angry antics that never actually addresses a thread topic. All you are is a bitter old fart who thinks solely insulting people on an internet political board is somehow cool. It makes you feel superior, in some sadistic way.

You're a complete narcissist.

Buy bye loser.....

Smoke another doob, stoner. See how much smarter you get.

 

[archives]

I'm not going to clutter up the forum with every little case where they've done so. Go look it up yourself if you want.

"Go look it yourself," how come I'm not surprised

Next

 

[archives]

Nope. No dictionary defines any word. No dictionary owns any word. Dictionaries are used to standardize spelling and pronunciation, and give examples of how a word is used, but they do not define any word.

People define words. It's what makes a language 'live' and ever changing. They are used to communicate ideas. People define words, collectively.

Dictionaries don't define laws, Science doesn't exist, facts aren't facts, the Gov't is illegal, geocentric model has never been invalidated, everything is a fallacy, and if you request any proof you have to google it yourself

Got to admit the guy is entertaining

 

[Into the Night]

What specific power is the federal government given that allows Congress to give the president emergency powers or gives the president the power to exercise those powers

Article I, Section 8, giving the House power of the budget, and the Senate the power to approve that budget. The Emergency Powers act allows the President to appropriate money from 'other programs' for emergency purposes. That money is essentially a general fund, and the President can use it as he sees fit, else it goes into designated programs. It's a budget item, legally passed by Congress.

or issue executive orders?

Article II.

Until 1931 when the Supreme Court incorporated free press to restrict states in Near v. Minnesota.

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution of the United States.

Yes, they do so regularly including striking down state laws as unconstitutional for violating free press.

The court does not have authority to change the Constitution, dumbass. They do it illegallly.