cancel2 2022
Canceled
I am sure that my sons would find that hilarious.
Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
I am sure that my sons would find that hilarious.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Kartoon Kenny strikes again.
Getin the ring
Verified User
I love how liberals insist their "scientists" are smarter than ours
Althea
Althea told me...
LMAO. You cite an outdated study, and now you wish to backtrack?
Althea
Althea told me...
Did they come with the standard package, or did you pay extra?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Moved from common or garden cunt list to supremely nasty racist cunt list.
Into the Night
Verified User
Nice pretty graph of random numbers.
It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric CO2. CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere. The Mauna Loa station didn't exist before 1958. They are also cooking their data. It is useless.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
A circular definition... Meaningless.
Another meaningless term, as "climate change" is not defined...
Weather is not global. There is no such thing as 'global weather'.
There cannot be stations measuring something which doesn't exist.
There cannot be data for something which doesn't exist.
Non-existence does not yield patterns.
Climate is not global. There is no such thing as a 'global climate'.
Those 'fundamentals' are nonsense.
This applies to YOU, not 'deniers'...
Into the Night
Verified User
Satellites are incapable of measuring an absolute temperature. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. You are ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law again, and even arguing a paradox.
1) infrared light is trapped by CO2 and does not reach space
2) infrared light is visible to satellites. It is not trapped by CO2 and does reach space.
Which is it, dude?
Into the Night
Verified User
His basic argument is that these factors are not zero, which is true. It is known that these factors will cause nucleation in a Wilson cloud chamber. These factors are pretty minor, but they ARE there.
But the major factor in cloud formation on Earth is none of these. Clouds on Earth simply form from convective heat and a bit of available humidity in the air. Any kind of dust or even radiation from the Sun (which is a LOT stronger than that from cosmic rays!) will trigger the actual nucleation itself.
The reason we remember Wilson and his cloud chamber machine today is because Wilson accidentally created a machine that allowed us to see, for the first time, the nuclei of atoms being split, which means we can see what we're doing when we are trying to split the atom. Made atomic power and nuclear research much easier that way!
Into the Night
Verified User
He does manage to find some good ones, even if it's to support his religion.
Into the Night
Verified User
Haven't you heard? Conservatives have no scientists!
I'm glad that science is just a set of falsifiable theories, and isn't even scientists or people at all.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Haven't you heard? Conservatives have no scientists!
I'm glad that science is just a set of falsifiable theories, and isn't even scientists or people at all.
You're simply a moron troll.
What study is it reporting on? It isn't published. It isn't peer reviewed. It is a piece of garbage they uploaded to a website.
For a scientific critique of the unpublished paper you claim is a "study" you can go here:
https://climatefeedback.org/claimre...ral-cloud-changes-can-explain-global-warming/
As to the rest of the garbage from Zerohedge, they pull quotes from unrelated articles and pretend they are from scientific papers they are not from.
The paper by the Kobe scientists can be found here:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-45466-8
It doesn't support anything in the unpublished paper and says nothing about current climate change. The quote mining from the paper by zerohedge is specious at best, outright fraud by zerohedge seems to be more likely.
Into the Night
Verified User
Not very hard, obviously. It's not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth's oceans. Not even NASA can do that.
"They are also cooking their data," tells the reader where this contributor comes from, anything he doesn't like is going to be "cooking the data"
Ask him what is Science and how it relates to climate change, is entertaining
I cut him off from FB.. he's become that much of a foul fellow
Althea
Althea told me...
Wait. You had different lists when you were wife shopping?
Of course not. It takes seconds to ferret out stupidity.