Draft: Articles of Impeachment
- Thread starter katzgar
- Start date
quit talkingand Impeach already..do it now!
I'm not a Congressman, so I can't.
But you are defending Trump's criminal behavior, and you'll be forced to continue defending it up through election day next year.
"Vote for us because we protect criminals" isn't exactly a strong campaign message heading into 2020 with the Senate up for grabs.
We have plenty to drag out...it's all in Mueller's report, which you lied about reading.
I'm all for watching you defend Trump from what's in the Mueller report; I don't believe you can do it successfully because you lack the savvy, skill, and temperament.
IMpeachment only ends up in a trial once it gets to the Senate.
The House can vote to impeach even if the Senate refuses to hold the trial.
Then you make the 2020 election about Conservatives protecting a lawless President, and a referendum on that.
In that scenario, Conservatives will lose because their campaign message will be "we defend criminals".
It DID conclude. Mullet resigned. He's off to St. Kitts. He said, "I stand by my report." Go for it. You have no charge.
The report you haven't read.
Per Truth Detector:
“NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”
This is what the radical Democrat Socialists want to impeach for.
Pelosi is terrified of impeachment.
“NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”
This is what the radical Democrat Socialists want to impeach for.
Pelosi is terrified of impeachment.
The CRIMINALS are the House Dunce-o-crats trying to turn the US into the Stalinist Soviet Union, with their "investigations IN SEARCH OF A CRIME"....
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
I never said he was!
Let try to explain the system to you Mueller was an independent investigator! His job was to investigate the Russian ties to the Trump campaign. A side investigation was obstruction of justice. Mueller turned over his findingsto the AG Barr. that was the end of Mueller's involvement. The AG then determines if there is sufficient evidence to bring charges.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
Currently how many out of the 435 in the house support start the impeachment process? Is it close to half? I guess the majority support defend criminals by your logic.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
That’s BS on steroids lol.
If Mullet was prevented, at the outset, from making a determination one way or another, WTF was the point of appointing him in the first place?
And if you are claiming Mullet made a determination in an off-hand, roundabout way, *then he just violated the DOJ rules that he claimed prevented him from making a determination*.
You’ve been had. We warned you that Mullet was a weasel.
My question was; how does Mueller enter into our discussion?
You're having to defend Trump's obstruction of justice, and his campaign's collusion with Russia, as laid out in Mueller's report. That's not an ideal position to be in as we head into 2020; your focus is entirely on defending Trump, leaving your policies open to devastating broadside attacks that you cannot counter.
You better pray we don't end up in a recession before election day. The economy is the only reason why it's 41% supporting impeachment. The second the economy turns south, which it is likely to do this quarter if the Atlanta Fed is right, it's curtains for you and Trump and the GOP.
What criminal behavior? You morons on the left keep bleating this lie like brain dead sheep without a shred of proof.
How are you going to defend Trump from what is laid out in the Mueller report?
How are you going to defend Trump from the 11 instances of obstruction Mueller lays out?
What is the defense? Are you going to just gaslight Bob Mueller? That's not a defense that will work.
Indeed.
I have it; I have read it. I am quite certain that you have not because you keep demanding there is something in a NOTHING burger. The report is a massive HOAX perpetrated on the American taxpayer containing ZERO substance and a LOT of speculative hyperbole that amounts to NOTHING.
Reading the footnotes of Volume II is a list of sources that are MEDIA stories that his own office LEAKED to the media. You really are an assclown on steroids. I hope you find a job soon so we don't have to suffer more of your inanity.
Doesn't matter how many support it now; once it starts, support will grow as you clowns weakly defend Trump's criminal activity.
Seriously, how are you going to defend Trump from the 11 instances of obstruction laid out in Mueller's report?
How are you going to defend Trump from the instances in Mueller's report that detail his campaign's collusion with Russia?
How are you going to defend Trump from that?
You won't be able to. All your 2020 focus is going to be on defending Trump's criminal behavior, and you're going to pay for that at the polls.
"Obstruction of Justice is OK because ____"
-You, in a few months, probably
Per Truth Detector:
“NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”
This is what the radical Democrat Socialists want to impeach for.
Pelosi is terrified of impeachment.
“NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”
This is what the radical Democrat Socialists want to impeach for.
Pelosi is terrified of impeachment.
Would love to watch you and the GOP defend Paul Manafort sharing polling data with Russian spies.
Would love to watch you and the GOP defend Trump's attempt to end the SC investigation.
Would love to watch you and the GOP defend Flynn's selling out of the country.
I would love to see the Conservative defenses of that behavior. It would make for amazing TV.
"You see, Trump had to obstruct justice because the investigation made him look bad"
-You, in a few months, probably
"You see, there's nothing illegal about Paul Manafort sharing highly confidential GOP polling data with Russian spies"
-You, in a few months, probably
"You see, there's nothing wrong with Mike Flynn offering sanction relief to Russia"
-You, in a few months, probably