Juries do not decide innocence; they decide guilt or not guilty. Innocence is PRESUMED.
Draft: Articles of Impeachment
- Thread starter katzgar
- Start date
Juries do not decide innocence; they decide guilt or not guilty. Innocence is PRESUMED.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol.....everyone knows you have nothing to drag out......the public's already aware of everything you are and except for "almost" 60 demmycunts in the house no one is interested in impeachment.......
How can we impeach if no crime has been committed? Illiterate Moron.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
As any other citizen, Trump is entitled to the presumption of innocence. It’s a bedrock principle of our system of justice.
Mullet screwed it up. His role as prosecutor *was strictly* an either/or proposition: either recommend an indictment or not. There’s no in between or kinda/sorta but not quite guilty. In not offering an up or down conclusion to his own investigation Mullet effectively left it to Barr and Rosenstein to finish his task.
And they did. Donald Trump is presumed innocent of both collusion and obstruction.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
Pelosi: Public Wants Impeachment Now Because They Don't Understand The Process
Posted By Tim Hains
On Date June 5, 2019
Speaker Nancy Pelosi appeared frustrated that so many people are calling for the House to impeach the president now without truly understanding how the process works. At her weekly press conference Wednesday morning, Pelosi said:
SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: What's important for people to know, first of all, I travel all the time in the country. Do you know that most people think impeachment means you're out of office? Did you ever get that feeling or are you just in the bubble here? They think if you get impeached, you're gone, and that is completely not true.
(VIDEO)
And I may have thought that myself 50 years ago. You get impeached and it is an indictment. An indictment. So when you're impeaching somebody, you want to make sure you have the strongest possible indictment because it is not the means to an end that people think. All you do, vote to impeach, bye bye birdie. It isn't that. It is an indictment, so you want to have the best possible indictment.
Going through the legal process in a way that shows accommodation, that we need to get the courts to rule in our favor because we've done it correctly and the rest.
video at https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...because_they_dont_understand_the_process.html
Posted By Tim Hains
On Date June 5, 2019
Speaker Nancy Pelosi appeared frustrated that so many people are calling for the House to impeach the president now without truly understanding how the process works. At her weekly press conference Wednesday morning, Pelosi said:
SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: What's important for people to know, first of all, I travel all the time in the country. Do you know that most people think impeachment means you're out of office? Did you ever get that feeling or are you just in the bubble here? They think if you get impeached, you're gone, and that is completely not true.
(VIDEO)
And I may have thought that myself 50 years ago. You get impeached and it is an indictment. An indictment. So when you're impeaching somebody, you want to make sure you have the strongest possible indictment because it is not the means to an end that people think. All you do, vote to impeach, bye bye birdie. It isn't that. It is an indictment, so you want to have the best possible indictment.
Going through the legal process in a way that shows accommodation, that we need to get the courts to rule in our favor because we've done it correctly and the rest.
video at https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...because_they_dont_understand_the_process.html
Darth Omar
Russian asset
I think Nancy is trying to say impeachment means a trial; and since they don’t have the goods it wouldn’t end well for democrats lol.
You defend criminality, not me.
You got a lot of things to work through still if you think a platform of defending criminals is one that will win in 2020.
You really need to get off your knees more so you can actually read what has happened.
One more time, illiterate moron.
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
What part of “would not” confuses you, illiterate dumbfuck?
Again? Wow. When are the DUNCE-O-CRAT going to GROW THE BALLS to PUT IT TO A VOTE? ( And guarantee Trump's re-election )
After the investigations conclude, we'll have a clearer picture.
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
Exactly what I said from the beginning and when Mueller didn't find evidence that confirmed Trump was guilty he stated such. He did not say Trump was innocent! Only that there wasn't evidence to support a charge. And must be presumed to be innocent.
That concept ELUDES the STALINIST LEFT, who also delude that PROSECUTORS CAN "EXONERATE" PEOPLE....
Prosecutors DO NOT "EXONERATE" ANYONE...EVER.
They either BRING CHARGES or RECOMMEND CHARGES..MUELLER DID NEITHER = "INNOCENT" in the United States of America, the STALINIST LEFT's BULLSHIT NOTWITHSTANDING...
Mueller is not the AG or a jury; how does that enter into our discussion? It wasn't Mueller's job to determine guilt or innocence.
True; another moronic claim made by the dishonest corrupt Comey.
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
I didn't say he wasn't only that Mueller did not find enough evidence to bring charges. Which means Trump must be presumed innocent. The only person who knows for sure is Trump.
It DID conclude. Mullet resigned. He's off to St. Kitts. He said, "I stand by my report." Go for it. You have no charge.
