Congress should impeach Bob Barr
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
reagansghost
eternal
100% agree, he's a lying fuck just like his boss
Darth Omar
Russian asset
I thought trying to remove people while they were doing a criminal investigation was a big no-no lol.
Bob Barr is not the AG you incoherent dunce. The name is William Barr idiot.
It is clear that you are a FAKE attorney and merely one of the many liberal hack dullards on the forum that believe that you can fabricate your own version of reality.
FACTS:
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Barr: applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
They can't keep up with their own lies and false narratives. Jarod thinks he is Bob.
evince
Truthmatters
Impeachment is a trial idiot not a removal
Bob Barr Bob Barr Bob Barr Bob Barr Bob Barr Bob Barr Bob Barr!!!
He didn't lie to congress; I haven't seen a single shred of evidence to support this moronic claim any more than I have seen any evidence Trump committed any crimes.
What do you think will happen to YOUR party of the Jackass when they go down all these rabbit holes and keep coming up empty?
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Do you want to try that again Brad?
Nothing worse than a pretend lawyer who can't express himself
Darth Omar
Russian asset
They can't keep up with their own lies and false narratives. Jarod thinks he is Bob.
They’re absolutely shameless about it lol.
Superfreak
Verified User
What did he lie about counselor?
Also, why are you too stupid to get his name correct?
Also, why do you continue to running away from your claim? Where is the quote from the report that shows 'plenty of collusion'?
You thought wrong
Superfreak
Verified User
what did he lie about?
You keep saying that, but provide no evidence. Just like a liberal lemming.
where is the evidence barr lied? didn't the democrats have multiple opportunities to ask him questions under oath?
Note with interest AG Barr’s 4/10 Senate testimony. “Q: Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion? A: I don’t know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion.”
Now it appears that Mueller objected in his 3/27 letter.
"On April 9, Rep. Charlie Crist, D-Fla., asked Barr if he knew the basis of reports that members of the special counsel's team were “frustrated” by his decision to release a four-page summary of the Mueller report, rather than the summaries the special counsel had prepared for that purpose. Barr responded, “No, I don’t.”
That was false. In a letter that became public only this week, we now know that Mueller wrote the attorney general on March 27, two days after Barr’s four-page summary, to ask that he release the executive summaries that Mueller’s team had already prepared for the public, and to complain that the letter from Barr failed to capture the “context, nature, and substance” of his work and conclusions and had caused “public confusion about critical aspects” of the investigation. And yet Barr’s answer to a simple question from a member of Congress was to act as if Mueller had never communicated these serious objections."
They did ask him questions under oath. And he lied.
Note with interest AG Barr’s 4/10 Senate testimony. “Q: Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion? A: I don’t know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion.”
Now it appears that Mueller objected in his 3/27 letter.
"On April 9, Rep. Charlie Crist, D-Fla., asked Barr if he knew the basis of reports that members of the special counsel's team were “frustrated” by his decision to release a four-page summary of the Mueller report, rather than the summaries the special counsel had prepared for that purpose. Barr responded, “No, I don’t.”
That was false. In a letter that became public only this week, we now know that Mueller wrote the attorney general on March 27, two days after Barr’s four-page summary, to ask that he release the executive summaries that Mueller’s team had already prepared for the public, and to complain that the letter from Barr failed to capture the “context, nature, and substance” of his work and conclusions and had caused “public confusion about critical aspects” of the investigation. And yet Barr’s answer to a simple question from a member of Congress was to act as if Mueller had never communicated these serious objections."
Superfreak
Verified User
Garud is simply running another of his parrot threads. He parrots what his masters demand of him, then runs away when asked to back up his claims.
"No obstruction, no collusion".
Turn out, lots of obstruction and lots of collusion.