If everyone is a descendant of Adam & Eve

reagansghost said:
doesn't that mean all humans are inbreeds?

sick fuckin religion, let's be honest
Click to expand...

You are a sick fuckin individual.
If this is what you believe are you fucking your mama you sick fuck. No wonder you don’t leave the house. You have no life other than fuckin your mama and this forum. Pitiful
 
reagansghost said:
doesn't that mean all humans are inbreeds?

sick fuckin religion, let's be honest
Click to expand...

But here you are....asking the question. Thus you exist....and guess what?..... you incestuously share up to 50% DNA with your own mother. The answer is within the pages of the Holy Scriptures. Its a simple matter of applying "science". Its simply a matter of ignorant Social Mores' v. Science You are upset because your neighbors find incest deplorable today as per the established societal norms? Ever ask yourself just where those NORMS came from....why is incest so looked down upon today? The laws found in the pages of the Holy Scriptures.

In the beginning with the First male and female, i.e., Adam and Eve there was no practical scientific reason that prohibited offspring sharing the same DNA from marrying. Look at the facts of science today. When any child is born that child is born with close to 50% DNA markers from each parent....combine the 2 and it makes a unique personal DNA signature. Those are facts of Science.....every child is born sharing DNA from their immediate ancestors.

In the record found in the Holy Scriptures.....Eve shared 100% DNA with Adam, Eve was created directly from Adams body, specifically the scriptures detail that EVE was created from a rib bone of Adam (Genesis 2:21-22).

This scriptural truth can't be accepted by many....yet it is a matter of record. Why did it not matter that Adam and Eve shared the exact same DNA signature....and later in the historical chronological record of scriptures we find INCEST forbidden?

The scientific reality is the fact that TODAY....incest is forbidden for a reason when it was accepted as NORMAL in the early record of the Holy Scriptures. There are genetic reasons that can occur when 2 close relatives marry today. When the 1st male and female mated or procreated as was the command from God (go forth and multiply)…..there were no diseases that mutate the human DNA, no genetic diseases, the human body was brand new with no previous ancestral history that could have been corrupted by any kind of disease or deformity.

Look at the record found in scripture. Man lived hundreds of years instead of decades in the beginning. Adam was 130 years old and still bearing children with Eve, "Adam lived 130 years, and begot a son, in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth. After he begat Seth, the days of Adams were 800 years; and HE HAD SONS AND DAUGHTERS." -- Genesis 5:3-4

Its true that Cain and Able were Adam and Eve's first children….but the scriptures are clear Adam and Eve had at least a total of 3 more sons and 2 daughters.....these the scriptures mention, but that does not limit that number from being even more because its not mentioned, there could have been dozens more over a period of 800 years....how many generations is that?

Its obvious.....God, nor Adam and Eve seen a problem with offspring marriage. There were no diseases as per the recorded length of life spans. That span has gone from over 800 to a record found in scripture to be around 70 - 80 years Ps. 90:10 Using deductive logic and science....its easy to determine that this constantly decreasing life span was caused by disruption of the perfect DNA signature with each proceeding generation diseases caused DNA corruption and mutation (an interruption of the perfect strain of DNA....making each generation lack something that the previous generations had). To the point that we as human beings are born dying of radiation poisoning.....after about 30 years the human body begins to decay with age.

But...over time one can record where that attitude changed to the point where God declared that no marriage was acceptable for relatives closer than 2nd cousins. After the generations of Adam.....it was the acceptable norm for Abraham to marry his 1/2 sister. -- Genesis 20:1-12. Looking further along the chronological record.....such as during the time of Moses...the LAW forbid cousins to marry (Lev. 18:6-18).

Why? After generations of life.....with the life span growing shorter and shorter with each generational gap....the human DNA strain had become subject to corruption by the many diseases that mankind had encountered along that chronological historical timeline.
 
Last edited:
reagansghost said:
doesn't that mean all humans are inbreeds?

sick fuckin religion, let's be honest
Click to expand...

So the very first mutation that branched from the common ancestor instantly had its own inbreeding cycle? If you believe in evolution, the mutants would have slowly introduced their adaptations by becoming the most prolific achievers among the population and spread their adaptations in a manner completely opposite to your silly notion. learn some science, you retard
 
tinfoil said:
So the very first mutation that branched from the common ancestor instantly had its own inbreeding cycle? If you believe in evolution, the mutants would have slowly introduced their adaptations by becoming the most prolific achievers among the population and spread their adaptations in a manner completely opposite to your silly notion. learn some science, you retard
Click to expand...

Science tells us that MUTATION does not ad to a healthy DNA string.....it takes away from that which is perfect and makes it less perfect....i.e., DEFORMED. Mutation does not EVOLVE it decays. But....MUTATION makes for a good SCI FI read. But don't ask a water head baby to read it.
 
Ralph said:
Science tells us that MUTATION does not ad to a healthy DNA string.....it takes away from that which is perfect and makes it less perfect....i.e., DEFORMED. Mutation does not EVOLVE it decays. But....MUTATION makes for a good SCI FI read. But don't ask a water head baby to read it.
Click to expand...

Science says nothing of the sort. Mutation is what allows infectious organisms, as one example, to develop resistance to antibiotics. Not so good from your POV, but excellent for the organisms' survival.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Science says nothing of the sort. Mutation is what allows infectious organisms, as one example, to develop resistance to antibiotics. Not so good from your POV, but excellent for the organisms' survival.
Click to expand...

No….healthy DNA and or RNA is what allows germs to adapt, DNA just like in mankind that lies dormant until it is required to act, to adapt to a changing environment.

If nature(God) did not build this ability into the original lifeform, this ability to adapt....mankind would have gone extinct the first time he encountered that simple virus....just like that simple virus would have become extinct if it did not pre-possess that ability to adapt to an environment that would have otherwise made extinct that simple lifeform. Its called "MIRCO-EVOLUTION....i.e., horizonal evolution" the ability to adapt and overcome. There is no such thing as "MACRO evolution..i.e. vertical evolution" where something has the ability to change into a completely different life form. That virus.....is still the same virus, it just became RESISTANT to the poison that was killing it.

Nothing.....not even a simple lifeform like a plant based virus or an animal based bacterium has the ability to change into a completely different lifeform. Just as the scriptures declare and Louis Pasteur proved in experiment. Life can only be procreated by the same pre-exiting lifeform. Its the reason that life can never be manufactured in the lab.....only God can create from NOTHING.

God created nature and the physical laws that govern its existence....Just like Pasteur proved, life can only reproduce after its own kind (Genesis 1:11-12, 21, 24-25)
 
Last edited:
Ralph said:
No….healthy DNA and or RNA is what allows germs to adapt, DNA just like in mankind that lies dormant until it is required to act, to adapt to a changing environment. If nature(God) did not build this ability into the original lifeform, this ability to adapt....mankind would have gone extinct the first time he encountered that simple virus....just like that simple virus would have become extinct if it did not pre-possess that ability to adapt to an environment that would have otherwise made extinct that simple lifeform. Its called "MIRCO-EVOLUTION....i.e., horizonal evolution" the ability to adapt and overcome. There is no such thing as "MACRO evolution..i.e. vertical evolution" where something has the ability to change into a completely different life form. That virus.....is still the same virus, it just became RESISTANT to the poison that was killing it.
Click to expand...

Got a link to the religious nonsense website you copied this from? You are absolutely incorrect about your so-called "macro evolution," btw.

"Before the widespread use of DNA data, hippos had been thought to be closely related to pigs, but DNA data show that whales are closely related to hippos. "
(Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090318153803.htm)

I'm pretty sure that most of us will agree that hippos and whales look nothing alike. This referenced article states that it was formerly believes that hippos were more closely related genetically to pigs. The DNA evidence, however, refutes this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top