If everyone is a descendant of Adam & Eve

[Ralph]

Got a link to the religious nonsense website you copied this from? You are absolutely incorrect about your so-called "macro evolution," btw.

"Before the widespread use of DNA data, hippos had been thought to be closely related to pigs, but DNA data show that whales are closely related to hippos. "
(Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090318153803.htm)

I'm pretty sure that most of us will agree that hippos and whales look nothing alike. This referenced article states that it was formerly believes that hippos were more closely related genetically to pigs. The DNA evidence, however, refutes this.

So Darwinian Evolution has now became a LAW of SCIENCE a FACT and not a theory void of the required evidence to make it a fact of science instead of speculation, a hypothesis, a theory? Simply link this new evidence where you have evidence of one life form changing into a completely different life form.....viral, bacterial, plant or animal. Go for it.....show me that link of SCIENCE that proves that marco/vertical evolution is a fact of science. You will not because you cannot......its a philosophy of the mind not a physical law of reality.

And "has been thought"......is a scientific term and not a philosophical term? Really? Thought exists in the mind...…Example: I can think that a bullfrog has wings and does not bump its ass every time it jumps....but that thought void of objective evidence and experimentation within the limits of the Scientific Method..does not make my thought a fact, its just a thought that exists only in one place, between my ears.

In fact.....why don't you present one link that does not include the subjective philosophical terms, "has been thought", "appears", "Suggests", "points to"....etc., ? You have just presented "pseudo science" and pretended it was APPLIED SCIENCE.

That link that proves life can only pro-create from existing life? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Pasteur

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

So Darwinian Evolution has now became a LAW of SCIENCE a FACT and not a theory void of the required evidence to make it a fact of science instead of speculation, a hypothesis, a theory? Simply link this new evidence where you have evidence of one life form changing into a completely different life form.....viral, bacterial, plant or animal. Go for it.....show me that link of SCIENCE that proves that marco/vertical evolution is a fact of science. You will not because you cannot......its a philosophy of the mind not a physical law of reality.

And "has been thought"......is a scientific term and not a philosophical term? Really? Thought exists in the mind...…

In fact.....why don't you present one link that does not include the subjective philosophical terms, "has been thought", "appears", "Suggests", "points to"....etc., ?

You already have a link. Here's another: https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evograms_03

The science and the scientific research devoted to current and past species, genetics, and evolution is a complex yet infinitely fascinating realm. It's much more satisfying than "Sky Daddy did it."

 

[Ralph]

You already have a link. Here's another: https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evograms_03

The science and the scientific research devoted to current and past species, genetics, and evolution is a complex yet infinitely fascinating realm. It's much more satisfying than "Sky Daddy did it."

So…..you double downed on "IT IS THOUGHT" and presented some artists THOUGHT of what MIGHT HAVE happened. LMAO Not an actual photo....but a DRAWING created in someone's mind is supposed to be OBJECTIVE evidence of "it is thought"? As I said.....you cannot present evidence proving Darwinian Evolution (Marco/vertical/upwards) is a fact of science.....because there is no such evidence that exists. If it did there would be a LAW of EVOLUTION....not a THEORY (thought based....as you just demonstrated) of Evolution where thoughts are generated as evidence (as you also demonstrated when you presented DRAWINGS (art) not photos attempting to present it as objective evidence. Just where is art generated?



PSEUDO SCIENCE: an activity "resembling" science but using FACRICATIONS of the mind.

ART: a product of human creativity (imagination).

And if you are going to accept that type of modern art as evidence......why do you refuse to accept historical cave art where Dino's and men existed beside each other as EVIDENCE?

https://worldnewsdailyreport.com/pr...umans-hunting-dinosaurs-discovered-in-kuwait/

NOW run away to the web again....find some more THOUGHTS that are not your own. Just a 'thought' of my own. If man evolved from primates...….why are primates still existing on earth today, are they the ones too stupid to EVOLVE that ride the short bus?