A great first step to ending Abortion!

[gfm7175]

Stop.

This isn't about protecting the sanctity of life for you people.

This is about proliferating your rotten genetics by forcing women to birth your slime children.

Stop.

You seem to have your mind completely made up, as you keep repeating the same two mantras over and over again even though I have answered them (which answers you ignore)...

Any continued discourse with you is, unfortunately, a waste of my time.

 

[LV426]

People might wonder why God is so evil and hasn't provided them with the cure to cancer... God could easily reply "I did, but you aborted him/her"...

Then why doesn't God just create a new person to do that?

These are the questions you face when you base your entire outlook on a book of adapted Stone Age Fables commissioned by a barely-literate English King from Scotland in 1611.

 

[Mason Melchizedek]

‘Thank you, Gov. DeWine We should be protecting life, from the beginning, to the end....
Be the voice for those who have none....

Fuck off DeWine,you know damn well it's unconstitutional!
5 minutes after he signed ,ACLU filed suit!

 

[LV426]

You seem to have your mind completely made up, as you keep repeating the same two mantras over and over again even though I have answered them (which answers you ignore)...

Any continued discourse with you is, unfortunately, a waste of my time.

You've lied and said you care about the sanctity of life, but that's insincere and you know it's insincere.

The reality is that you have an entitlement complex and that complex makes you think that you are owed something by women.

You aren't entitled to anything, not even your opinion.

Entitlements are earned, and you haven't earned shit.

 

[LV426]

You seem to have your mind completely made up, as you keep repeating the same two mantras over and over again even though I have answered them (which answers you ignore)...

Any continued discourse with you is, unfortunately, a waste of my time.

"I care about the children and the sanctity of life"

Yet you oppose...

Free school lunches
S-CHIP
Welfare programs for kids
Gun control
Abolishing the death penalty

You don't believe in the sanctity of life. You're just a fraud.

 

[gfm7175]

The murdering of unborn children IS my business... It is immoral.


Argument By Repetition Fallacy. I have addressed this claim of yours MULTIPLE times... A woman (in the general sense) is not being forced to give birth. She WILLINGLY had sex with a man, and sex can result in pregnancy. It is HER WILLING CHOICE which leads her to potential pregnancy; she is not at any point forced to give birth. Do try to address my counterargument this time...


Psychoquackery.

So rape is a willing choice?

Interesting you think that.

Did I say "interesting"? I meant expected.

And you'll come back and say "well only a 3% of abortions are because of that"...and I'll say to that; "well, how do you know the reason a woman gets an abortion?" You will have no answer for that.

Read the bolded part... You still aren't willing to be genuine in this discussion...

 

[LV426]

Read the bolded part... You still aren't willing to be genuine in this discussion...

So you're anti-abortion stance has some serious holes in it then, if you're now making allowances for yourself.

So you don't really believe in the sanctity of life, you just believe that all women are sluts who can't keep their legs together and children are the requisite punishment for that.

That's fucked up. You are disturbed.

 

[LV426]

Read the bolded part... You still aren't willing to be genuine in this discussion...

So you believe in the sanctity of life and oppose abortion and on this you are unbending...except when a woman's bodily autonomy is violated, then it's ok with you that the victim extinguishes that conception.

So you are rather bendy on your beliefs and principles, it seems.

 

[gfm7175]

You've lied and said you care about the sanctity of life, but that's insincere and you know it's insincere.

The reality is that you have an entitlement complex and that complex makes you think that you are owed something by women.

You aren't entitled to anything, not even your opinion.

Entitlements are earned, and you haven't earned shit.

I feel sorry for you. You see quite angry all the time, and are quite venomous towards people who you view as your 'enemies'... That book from 1611 (it existed WELL before that, btw) has numerous good tips about how one should be slow to anger (and etc.) ... Maybe you could learn a thing or two from reading it??

 

[gfm7175]

So you believe in the sanctity of life and oppose abortion and on this you are unbending...except when a woman's bodily autonomy is violated, then it's ok with you that the victim extinguishes that conception.

So you are rather bendy on your beliefs and principles, it seems.

You don't know my position on that... You are once again, assuming...

 

[LV426]

I feel sorry for you. You see quite angry all the time, and are quite venomous towards people who you view as your 'enemies'

You have open contempt for women and a compulsion to control them because of a lack of control in your own life.

Everything you believe is a crock of shit.

 

[LV426]

That book from 1611 (it existed WELL before that, btw

No, it didn't.

Prior to the King James Bible, there was just a collection of various fables, adapted over time, mostly in Latin.

The King James version in 1611 is the one all modern Christians use, and that version was commissioned by the English King James from Scotland.

So your entire world view is informed solely by a book of fables commissioned and adapted by English nobility just 408 years ago.

How the fuck can anyone take you seriously?

 

[LV426]

has numerous good tips about how one should be slow to anger (and etc.

You're such an angry person that you want to make a stranger's medical life your business.

 

[LV426]

Maybe you could learn a thing or two from reading it??

No thanks. I stopped reading fables when I was a kid.

 

[LV426]

You don't know my position on that... You are once again, assuming...

Problem is your position keeps changing depending on how your argument is faring.

You used to say all life is sanctified...then you walked that back by making exceptions in the case of victimization, which really undermines your principle belief.

You're all over the place because you're not being honest about your true motivation.

 

[gfm7175]

"I care about the children and the sanctity of life"

Yet you oppose...

#1Free school lunches
#2S-CHIP
#3Welfare programs for kids
#4Gun control
$5Abolishing the death penalty

You don't believe in the sanctity of life. You're just a fraud.

#1 - First off, they are not free. Somebody pays for them and puts the time into making them. Nothing in this life is "free"... Secondly, if one can't afford to FEED their kid, let alone anything else for their kid, then they probably shouldn't have a kid. With that said, I'm fine with this sort of thing being supported through charity, rather than compulsion.

#2 - I'm fine with the idea itself, but not with the federal government's involvement with it. I would also rather it be more of a charitable thing, rather than through compulsion.

#3 - I'm fine with the idea itself, but not on a federal level. I would even likely oppose it on a state level, as I would instead support this sort of thing being implemented through charity rather than compulsion.

#4 - This violates the 2nd Amendment, so I do not support it. It also violates my inherent right to self-defense. People take lives from other people, not guns, not knives, not any object...

#5 - I only support the death penalty in quite extreme cases, where there is no chance of remorse from the person for whatever reason. I want the life to be saved, and I want the conscience of that person to be "fixed", but if that person is deemed a major threat to other people's lives beyond the point of repair, then it is better for that threat to be alleviated.

 

[LV426]

#1 - First off, they are not free.

They are for the kids.

So you don't give a shit about kids once they're born, only in the womb. That's weird. So you want to protect just fetuses...but why just fetuses?

Simple; because you predominant fear is if you do conceive, that the woman will abort your shitty offspring that you worked so fucking hard to make.

 

[LV426]

#2 - I'm fine with the idea itself, but not with the federal government's involvement with it. I would also rather it be more of a charitable thing, rather than through compulsion.

So you don't support it. You only support fetuses, not children. That's weird.

Now why would you only protect the sanctity of life for fetuses? Well, obviously because you think you are entitled to a child.

 

[LV426]

#3 - I'm fine with the idea itself, but not on a federal level. I would even likely oppose it on a state level, as I would instead support this sort of thing being implemented through charity rather than compulsion

"I am OK with it, but I oppose it."

So you oppose it.

So I'm accurate again.

 

[LV426]

#4 - This violates the 2nd Amendment, so I do not support it. It also violates my inherent right to self-defense. People take lives from other people, not guns, not knives, not any object...

Right, you care more about your hobby than the sanctity of life.

So again, LV is accurate...