Here who's winning under Trump Tax Law

Nope just applying the same standard you want to hold everyone else to. Sorry if you can dish it out but not take it.

Can you cite some examples of anecdotes that I've posted in an attempt to bolster my arguments?

I'll understand if you can't, of course, Grumps.
 
Can you cite some examples of anecdotes that I've posted in an attempt to bolster my arguments?

I'll understand if you can't, of course, Grumps.

Not my responsibility it's yours. I am simplying applying your standard to you and it looks like you don't like it.
 
You made the claim, Grumps.





Unless you can cite examples of "anecdotes" I allegedly "expect others to accept," your claim is unproven, Grumps.

And because you cannot prove I'm wrong. Then everything you say is total bullshit. See sport there are two sides to every point. I have truth you have BS.

At one time I thought you were a reliable conservative but I now realize how wrong I was.
 
And because you cannot prove I'm wrong. Then everything you say is total bullshit.

No proof for your claim, Grumps?

I don't need to prove your claim is invalid, Grumps. You need to back it up.

I didn't think you could, and it looks like I was right.

At one time I thought you were a reliable conservative but I now realize how wrong I was.

If you think being a "reliable conservative" means having double standards, count me out, Grumps.

Want a tissue?
 
I don't know for a fact that your taxes are down, Counselor.

I will stipulate for the record that I believe that it is possible. Absent my examination of your personal financial documents, your claim is mere hearsay, as you knew when you posted it.

lol.......no child, my claim is not hearsay........it is a direct statement........if you now told someone that my taxes were lower, because I told you so, THEN it would be hearsay.........if I describe something that I myself observed, such as the numbers I scribe on my tax return, it is direct evidence......to be hearsay it must be second hand evidence........I can tell you that a court would use my statement was proof that my taxes were down in absence of any evidence to the contrary........
 
No proof for your claim, Grumps?

I don't need to prove your claim is invalid, Grumps. You need to back it up.

I didn't think you could, and it looks like I was right.



If you think being a "reliable conservative" means having double standards, count me out, Grumps.

Want a tissue?

Nice try sport but You are the one who demands others to prove what they say now the shoe is on the other foot I am demanding you do what you demand of others and now you are whining like a baby.

And here you are

VoQ1O04.jpg


Poor baby go cry to your mommy.
 
Nice try sport but You are the one who demands others to prove what they say now the shoe is on the other foot I am demanding you do what you demand of others and now you are whining like a baby.

Your butthurt must be immense, Grumps. You claimed I posted anecdotes and expect others to accept them. Where's your proof?

Then why do you do it?
Why do I do what, Grumps?
Expect others to accept your Anecdotes?
 
Your butthurt must be immense, Grumps. You claimed I posted anecdotes and expect others to accept them. Where's your proof?

Clearly fuck head you don't understand English. The burden isn't on me to prove shit. Your fellow posters on JPP have seen what I am referring to. Good by loser.
 
lol.......no child, my claim is not hearsay........it is a direct statement........if you now told someone that my taxes were lower, because I told you so, THEN it would be hearsay.........if I describe something that I myself observed, such as the numbers I scribe on my tax return, it is direct evidence......to be hearsay it must be second hand evidence........I can tell you that a court would use my statement was proof that my taxes were down in absence of any evidence to the contrary........

Witness testimony can be tested and assessed for reliability. Examples of approaches to testing and assessment include the use of questioning to identify possible gaps or inconsistencies, evidence of corroborating witnesses, documents, video and forensic evidence. Where a court lacks suitable means to test and assess testimony of a particular witness, such as the absence of forms of corroboration or substantiation, it may afford that testimony limited or no "weight" when making a decision on the facts.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
 
Clearly fuck head you don't understand English. The burden isn't on me to prove shit. Your fellow posters on JPP have seen what I am referring to. Good by loser.

Then why do you do it?
Why do I do what, Grumps?
Expect others to accept your Anecdotes?

I didn't think you could prove your claims, and I was right.

You don't know what anecdotal evidence is, do you, Grumps?
 
Aw how I love a good tap dance.
Clearly fuck head you don't understand English. The burden isn't on me to prove shit. Your fellow posters on JPP have seen what I am referring to. Good by loser.
Then why do you do it?
Why do I do what, Grumps?
Expect others to accept your Anecdotes?

Can't prove your claim, and can't stick to your stated intentions, either, can you, Grumps?

You don't know what the burden of proof is, do you?
 
Love seeing Conservatives turn on each other!

The mind boggles at the things you love.

A few years ago ,I meet someone who introduced me to BDSM. My first encounter, I thought it would be about how much pain, one could stand. But I soon learned the secret to BDSM. It's not about pain! But that fine line between pain, and a type of ecstasy I had never experienced! Sure there was pain, humiliation, submission, all of which I gladly with stood. To reach that ecstasy! For a year, I couldn't wait to heal from when encounter, so I could have another. During the beating one side of your brain wanted the beating to stop. The other side wanted it never to stop! It also taught one to trust your dominate completely to give you pain, but not to hurt you.

I'n not "turning" on anyone. Grumps says I post anecdotes and expect people to accept them, and denies that he has the responsibility to prove his claim. He is wrong.
 
Back
Top