No collusion!

Jarod said:
You don’t think he has it?
Click to expand...

You do????? You think Trump can edit it too????

giphy.gif
 
Nomad said:
That is not even close to what the report says.

The Russians employed a massive propaganda campaign to help convince dull-witted, weak-minded halfwits to vote for the Kremiln's preferred candidate, Donald Trump.

Just because Trump and Putin were clever enough to not leave a direct evidence trail connecting them, doesn't change that fact.

Congratulations on going with the guy Russia wanted in charge of America.

Do you ever wonder why they wanted him to win so badly?

No, of course you don't.

You couldn't care less as long as Trump beats the same drums you love the sound of.
Click to expand...

You poor mentally retarded moron:

The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Heff,



It will with the one in 2020. Republicans are usually more motivated to vote. They pretty much already turn out all the voters they can possibly muster. It's the Democrats who struggle to muster a strong turn-out.

That will change in 2020. Democrats now have a very powerful motivator to turn out to vote. I would not be surprised to see a record voter participation rate in 2020.

There is little the Republicans can do to increase voter participation. But the Democrats can and will turn out in much stronger numbers. Trump has provided them with the motivation to get out and vote.
Click to expand...

I believe everyone who voted for Trump in 2016 will vote for him again.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Only part of your statement is true -- the part about Clinton not gaming the EC and losing because of it. There is well-documented proof that the Russians did interfere in the election, including hacking into DNC computers, flooding social media with anti-Clinton memes, and so on. Yep, Trump won. That doesn't change the fact that multiple investigations are now taking place regarding his tax evasion, insurance fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, and so on.

Remember Al Capone and what they hung him with.
Click to expand...

Comey Tells Trump Russians Didn't Influence the Election

Is Comey lying?

https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/comey-fbi-russia-trump/2016/12/14/id/764008/
 
LV426 said:
Not at all.

Barr's the one saying this, but refusing to release the report.

So it's "take my word for it".

Why should anyone take Barr's word on anything?
Click to expand...

It's not just Barr's word. He's speaking about a 3 year special investigation. he's merely summarizing the results of that investigation.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Heff,



It will with the one in 2020. Republicans are usually more motivated to vote. They pretty much already turn out all the voters they can possibly muster. It's the Democrats who struggle to muster a strong turn-out.

That will change in 2020. Democrats now have a very powerful motivator to turn out to vote. I would not be surprised to see a record voter participation rate in 2020.

There is little the Republicans can do to increase voter participation. But the Democrats can and will turn out in much stronger numbers. Trump has provided them with the motivation to get out and vote.
Click to expand...

I think that is fair, but I also think this entire charade will syphon voters away from the Democrats.
 
LV426 said:
OR Barr is being dishonest, which has happened before (Iran Contra).

Why not just release the full report?
Click to expand...

An argument against it is it would allow House Democrats to cherry pick it in order to construct another conspiracy theory. Democrats aren’t acting in good faith: they want rid of Trump so bad that I’m convinced they’d sacrifice the next election to do it.

An argument in favor of releasing it is will be selectively leaked to the House Democrats and the media, anyway —kind of like what they did in order to construct the Russian conspiracy theory.

So let’s release EVERYTHING. Including all of the 302’s on Flynn, Stone and Papadopoulos and all the FISA stuff.

Let’s do this.
 
“The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
 
Nomad said:
Which dark, snake infested cavern up your ass did you pull the figure of $150,000 out of? You actually think that's all the Russian govt spent? You think it was just Facebook ads? You're even stupider than everyone has been giving you credit for, el-chumpo.

And just because nobody has travelled to whatever shithole you live in or bridge you dwell under to report personally to you the rationale they employed in casting their 2016 Presidential vote, and your weak-ass denial notwithstanding, it is a 100% certainty that the constant non-stop, Kremlin-driven, anti-Hillary drumbeat that persisted throughout the campaign season did IN FACT effect the choices made by a significant number of voters.

So, though you're obviously not man enough to own up it, your President was elected in large part with the aid, abetment and assistance of your comrades at The Kremlin.

Now go salute your hammer and sickle flag then suck on your crack pipe for awhile, comrade.
Click to expand...

The $150,000 number was reported in the news. You didn’t know that?

You are making assumptions you can’t back up with fact.

The claim is that these so called ads on Facebook impacted peoples votes. But I have seen no evidence it happened.

If you have some I would be happy to look at it.


#EXONERATED
 
Hello Heff,

Heff said:
I think that is fair, but I also think this entire charade will syphon voters away from the Democrats.
Click to expand...

Best of luck...

Another huge problem for Trump in 2020 is all the vulnerable Republican Senate seats. Trump is a powerful motivator for younger female and minority Democrats to challenge those seats held by the old white guys. Those campaigns are gonna heat up, and that is going to swell voter participation in 2020. My prediction is the majority of those additional voters are going to be voting against Trump. If he even lastas that long, and isn't taken down by financial crimes as Bannon said.
 
We don't believe the Democrats.
We don't believe the Republicans.
We don't believe the teachers.
We don't believe the Judge.
We didn't believe Bush.
We don't really believe Pelosi.
We don't believe Trump.
We don't believe Clinton.
We didn't believe Clinton.
We didn't believe Nixon.
We don't believe Mueller.
We don't believe the News.
We didn't believe anyone over 30 years old.
We don't believe anyone under 30 years old.
We don't believe the Koran.
We don't believe the Bible.
We don't believe the Wall.
We don't believe the Tax Laws.
We don't believe the Governor.
We don't believe the Church.
We don't believe our spouse.
We don't believe the Police.
We don't believe the Scientists.

If the toilets are flushing we believe the plumbers.

PS: I don't believe you!
 
Earl said:
Mueller has seen Mueller's report. If Barr had been inaccurate in his summary, Mueller would be screaming. The summary was accurate. No collusion and no proof of obstruction of justice.

Black really, really is black. It isn't white.
Click to expand...

Rosenstein has seen the report as well.

Why do leftists believe that Barr is inaccurate in his summary?

They really are unhinged

#EXONERATED
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
An argument against it is it would allow House Democrats to cherry pick it in order to construct another conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

But if it exonerates Trump, like you all claim it does based solely on Barr's summary, then they wouldn't be able to do this.

How would they cherry pick from a report we're promised by you all exonerates Trump?
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
An argument in favor of releasing it is will be selectively leaked to the House Democrats and the media, anyway —kind of like what they did in order to construct the Russian conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

So there's this report that you claim exonerates Trump based solely on Barr's summary, but you can't release it because Democrats will seize on parts of it that would undermine Barr's summary.

So that means Barr is being less than truthful, and you know it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top