They have. Isn't that hypocrisy?
Not to them. Again, as you said, their mindset is the ends justify the means.
They have. Isn't that hypocrisy?
There was total understanding.
You tried to pretend that race and gender didn't play as much of a role as it did.
In fact, the number of blacks voting skyrocketed when a black was the nominee for the Democrats. When a black wasn't that nominee, those numbers went back to levels they had been before the black nominee was on the ballot.
If one understood that I wasn't claiming race and gender didn't have a big role, why say I was?
Yes, when blacks had the first opportunity ever to vote for a black candidate for president, it boosted turnout a bit.

But where whites and blacks differ is that black voters have shown, again and again, a capacity for the majority of them to vote for someone not of their own race. That kind of color-blindness seems to be beyond the reach of the white majority, which ALWAYS votes for the white man.
You said the effect of identity politics involved was negative, didn't you?
Is that so? How many Black people have been viable candidates for POTUS?
Yes. Have you honestly looked at black voter turnout by year? The pattern leading up to and through the Obama years wasn't one of black apathy until a black guy ran, and then a sudden spike. It was a pattern of fairly steady increases in black turnout in 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012. Facts matter:A bit?![]()
Then why the dishonesty? If one understood that I wasn't claiming race and gender didn't have a big role, why say I was? Very weird stuff.
What makes you think that? Be specific, please.
Yes, when blacks had the first opportunity ever to vote for a black candidate for president, it boosted turnout a bit. I'm not denying that. On the flip side, I expect that if whites ever faced a presidential election where they DIDN'T have the ability to vote for a white, their turnout numbers would fall. But where whites and blacks differ is that black voters have shown, again and again, a capacity for the majority of them to vote for someone not of their own race. That kind of color-blindness seems to be beyond the reach of the white majority, which ALWAYS votes for the white man.
The dishonesty came from you claiming that race and gender didn't play a big role when, in fact, they did.
Who do you imagine made that claim? If you're thinking it was me, go back and reread. I obviously made the exact opposite argument.
It's depressing how often debates on sites like this come down to elderly right-wingers trying to counter arguments that only appeared in their own addled minds. Dementia is a hell of a thing!
You made it.
I didn't. Go back and reread. If you post the material you misread as such a claim, I can explain to you how you went wrong.
MAGA caps are a great way to know who the opioid users are and should be used as a tool to get the opioid epidemic under control
...you did make such a statement and now lie about it.
MAGA caps are a great way to know who the opioid users are and should be used as a tool to get the opioid epidemic under control
You should be shot on sight.
I got harassed wearing a Michigan State hat while on the University of Michigan campus. Apparently they were upset they lost the game.
I wonder if they will ban Michigan State apparel on the University of Michigan campus. Obviously wearing a Michigan State hat on the University of Michigan campus agitates some people and is a trigger for problems.
You were in no danger. Wear a Michigan hat to an Ohio State game and see how that works out. I know people who are long term ticket holders and they will not return to Ohio State games.
But that is not what a Make America Hate Hat stands for. A MAGA hat is more like wearing a fuck you hat. It is more like a Swastika than a politiocal statement. Trump ran on confrontation. His hat is a symbol for that.
Yes. Have you honestly looked at black voter turnout by year? The pattern leading up to and through the Obama years wasn't one of black apathy until a black guy ran, and then a sudden spike. It was a pattern of fairly steady increases in black turnout in 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012. Now, did the fact Obama's black help to keep that longer-term trend going? Probably. But as you can see from the graph, the rise in 2008 and 2012 was no greater than the rise in 2000 and 2004.