If this is not collusion, what is?

[Jarod]

How do you define collusion?

Because I think what is described in the Stone indictment is text book collusion.


https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-indictment-roger-stone

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Some people will just never see it no matter what. Best to just let them keep tilting at windmills.

 

[Jarod]

I see the Trump apologists are avoiding this..

To be expected. They would just rather just type "no collusion" and run.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

If this is not collusion, what is?

nothing is.....we've been telling you that for years.........

 

[Jarod]

nothing is.....we've been telling you that for years.........

Collusion does not exist? Why is it a word?

 

[dukkha]

I see the Trump apologists are avoiding this..

To be expected. They would just rather just type "no collusion" and run.

make your case for collusion.

Stone did not contact WIKI -so that's out and the info he gave to the "Trump campaign" was public knowledge

 

[cancel2 2022]

I see the Trump apologists are avoiding this..

To be expected. They would just rather just type "no collusion" and run.

You've proved to be a fool so many times in the past, nobody bothers with you anymore.

 

[Jarod]

You've proved to be a fool so many times in the past, nobody bothers with you anymore.

So what is collusion?

 

[Micawber]

Patriotism. MAGA. Murica.

 

[Jarod]

Patriotism. MAGA. Murica.

If I got a response this is what I expected.

Now they are denying collusion even exists in the world at all...

 

[PostmodernProphet]

the word exists to define something which is not a crime......

 

[Jarod]

the word exists to define something which is not a crime......

Did someone on this thread say it was a crime?

As a real lawyer, I can tell you that while there is not a particular crime, it can often add up to a particular crime... it is a part of all conspiracies.

 

[Enlightened One]

How do you define collusion?

Because I think what is described in the Stone indictment is text book collusion.


https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-indictment-roger-stone

Was he indicted for collusion?

 

[Jarod]

Was he indicted for collusion?

no, but collusion was illustrated in the complaint. As you can see. He colluded, but was charged with crimes that such collusion was a part of.

 

[Enlightened One]

make your case for collusion.

Stone did not contact WIKI -so that's out and the info he gave to the "Trump campaign" was public knowledge

I see Jarod is avoiding this.

 

[Jarod]

Rumppers keep saying, "No Collusion", but as you can see if you read the indictment, there was collusion.

 

[Enlightened One]

no, but collusion was illustrated in the complaint. As you can see. He colluded, but was charged with crimes that such collusion was a part of.

Did they even use the word collude?

 

[Jarod]

I see Jarod is avoiding this.

Avoiding it? I am right here...

He (is alledged to have) colluded with wiki and with members of the campaign to get stolen emails distributed to the public.

Are you stupid enough to deny this?

 

[Jarod]

Did they even use the word collude?

no

 

[Jarod]

I dont know why, based on the facts in the indictment, he was not charged with conspiracy to distribute stolen documents.