all millenials aren't bad.
I just threw that out there as trolling.
My beef is with the lunatic PC infested academia crowd. those are dangerous cretins
3 Reasons Why Gillette's 'Toxic Masculinity' Ad Is Incredibly Stupid And Degrading
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
I just threw that out there as trolling.
My beef is with the lunatic PC infested academia crowd. those are dangerous cretins
Narcissistic Personality Disorder is a psychological term, and it describes you perfectly here.
Well, that's because some "masculine" behavior is toxic. Like thinking women owe you something. Like how you think you're owed comfort for acting like a fucking asshole.
Why do you think you're owed that?
You don't have a masculinity problem.
You have a narcissistic personality disorder problem.
Just the ones that still live at home, leeching off their parents. No clue about the real world. Like LV.
no you dolt. the APA is now saying classical masculine traits are now a disorder
"Classical"
You mean your subjectivity.
"Classical" is a rhetorical device you're using as a replacement for saying you're just retconning standards. They're just goalposts you fully intend to move later on in this discussion.
"Classically" someone would have beat the living snot out of you ages ago. Classically, of course.
You just keep showing examples what the psychologist are talking about. You believe there should be a one size fits all behavior for men, it toxic, because all men aren’t alike, all men aren’t risk takers, all don’t keep failing and some men do get ground down. Requiring boys to act like every other boy is wrong. The same for girls. People are individuals, they should be allowed to be who they are and not fit into some societal mold.
Classically masculine men wore skirts and sandals.
Bet you think that's not masculine today.
Classically masculine men wore tights and powdered wigs.
But you don't think that's masculine today.
WTF are you talking about? you are rambling on with ad homs
and confusing personality disorders with innate character traits.
You post like someone who has read a psych book and thinks they have an understanding of human behavior.
Like a narcist would
ROFL
so period fashions of the 1700's are masculine or not?
Hint: they were just fashions
No way that idiot can read. All he is doing is regurgitating what his shrink tells him about himself........
No, I'm accurately describing you.
You just move the goalposts throughout this debate because you're on shaky ground and your toxic masculinity is preventing you from admitting you're a fucking idiot.
That's exactly what you're doing here.
LOL.
Like, literally, that is what you're doing.
Gaslighting is also toxic masculinity.
The art of poetry truly is gender neutral.
you are stretching so badly to make some inane pointless argument
You're the one who invoked "classically", and now that you realized the implications of doing so, suddenly you start shifting the goalposts.
Classically, masculine men were bisexual and would fuck each other.
Classically, masculine men used to wrestle in the nude.
But please, move those goalposts on what "classically masculine" means, because watching you ignore all of human history and choosing to focus on the last 50 or so years is a hoot!
Classically, masculine men used to put on dresses and pretend to be women. Some still do (Rudy Guiliani).