Rump caves on Syria!

Truth Detector said:
They will always be active sad sack. But their attempted take over of Iraq and large portions of Syria thanks to Obama have been destroyed.



You aren't intelligent enough to comprehend that because of Obama, we got ISIS. STFU, seriously.
Click to expand...

ISIS came out of Camp Bucca prison Iraq in 2004 and gained speed in Fallujah when Maliki discriminated against the Sunni city..

You are not only stupid, you're rude.
 
I support bringing our troops home, eventually, but once in a situation like we created in Syria, it must be done carefully and correctly. You don't just leave like Rump said he was going to do last month. The guy is a fool and we lose international respect when he behaves like this. It looks to me, now, like he is trying to do it correctly. I just wish we did not have to go through the threat to abandon our allies in the field to get here. Why does Rump do such awful things, only to capitulate.

He started with his Muslim ban, defending his claim that he would Ban All Muslims from entering the nation, and ending with a ban on a few Countries. (What I pointed out was the only thing he could do from the start).

He loses any dignity by refusing the study a situation before he makes some insane claim first.
 
Truth Detector said:
Thank you OBAMA!!!
Click to expand...

YOU fucks took the shit cork out of the bottle of bees remember diarrhea brain


remember us telling you going after Sadam would unleash a life long mess in the Middle east ?



turns out we were right and your assholes LIED us into this resulting condition



eat shit
 
US in southern Syria would coordinate with US existing presence in Iraq - but the only real reason to do it would be to suppress ISIS in a counter-terrorism role.
Better to just get out of Syria, but at least they will be out of the fighting going on in the north
 
anatta said:
US in southern Syria would coordinate with US existing presence in Iraq - but the only real reason to do it would be to suppress ISIS in a counter-terrorism role.
Better to just get out of Syria, but at least they will be out of the fighting going on in the north
Click to expand...

and now we know what Putin wants
 
The republican party conspired to lie us to war in Iraq.


the left was warning that it would destabilize the entire middle east


Sadam was a lump of shit

But he was a cork in the bottle of a crumbling middle east

FEAR of Sadam held the nutters in the middle east at bay


but Cheney wanted that OIL revenue


So your evil fucking party LIED us into the war


and the RESULT????


the bottle of bees had the shit cork taken out of it



every dead person in the middle east is BLOOD ion the hands of the republican party



you are evil


You are dying


and its a good thing the republican party will soon be dead
 
I am glad we are giving a consistent message to the world, I am glad they at least can count on stability of our word.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/26/opinion/an-iraq-war-won-t-destabilize-the-mideast.html



An Iraq War Won't Destabilize the Mideast
By REUEL MARC GERECHTNOV. 26, 2002

Arguments against a war in Iraq often revolve around the belief that an American invasion would destabilize the Middle East. According to this critique, the region is a powder keg of instability that a war, with all its inevitable unintended consequences, could well ignite. The Arab street would rise, radical Islamist recruiters would benefit from yet another grievance and Iraq's fractious citizens -- Arab Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds -- would possibly crack their country apart. Those cracks would spread throughout the region.
But a war with Iraq might not shake up the Middle East much at all. Most regimes in the area are too stable, strong and clever. For example, President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt appears to be vastly more adept than was Mohammed Reza Pahlevi, the shah of Iran. The shah allowed the clerical establishment considerable independence -- and Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini used the mosques and religious schools to build his network of revolutionary mullahs. Mr. Mubarak, by contrast, has thoroughly co-opted his religious hierarchy. The Egyptian people may riot over bread subsidies. They hit the streets in great numbers to mourn the passing of a beloved singer. They have not once set Egypt ablaze over the travails of the Palestinians or the bellicose actions of the United States. And Egypt, with its densely urban, youthful and homogeneous population, is perhaps the most likely state in the Middle East to succumb to a popular dissatisfaction rising from the streets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top