News that liberals probably won't like

That's not what Fact Check said, is it?

Obama exaggerated when defending his administration’s approval of a $535 million loan guarantee to Solyndra, a now-defunct solar company.

Obama referred to Solyndra’s loan at an Oct. 6 press conference as “a loan guarantee program that predates me.” That’s not accurate. Solyndra’s loan guarantee came under another program created by the president’s 2009 stimulus for companies developing “commercially available technologies.”

The president also deemed the loan guarantee program “successful”.


https://www.factcheck.org/2011/10/obamas-solyndra-problem/

No one believes what factcheck.org has to say, because they have been refuted so many times mostly by you Republicans. And it runs both ways, as they have proved Donald Trump out to be a liar and a thief many times, and you Republicans had a shit fit about them. So what do you do, believe what they say only when it plays into one of your bat-shit-crazy narratives? Hypocrite much? Why you maggot you!

If we listened to everything factcheck.org had to say, you, me, and everyone else would have had Donald Trump jerked out of office, tarred and feathered him, and thrown him in the piss pool about 2 years ago!
 
No one believes what factcheck.org has to say, because they have been refuted so many times.

List these alleged refutations. I'll understand if you won't.

And it runs both ways, as they have proved Donald Trump out to be a liar and a thief many times, and you Republicans had a shit fit about them. So what do you do, believe what they say only when it plays into one of your bat-shit-crazy narratives.

Unintentionally ironic.

You don't see the contradiction in your "argument?"
 
List these alleged refutations. I'll understand if you won't.



Unintentionally ironic.

You don't see the contradiction in your "argument?"

The argument is coming from Factcheck.org itself as they put out their very own refutes to their own factchecks.

So the organization does not even agree with themselves dude!

It's not about what you or I think!

If you could just get over yourself, you would have more credentials, integrity, and influence here in this forum!
 
The argument is coming from Factcheck.org itself as they put out their very own refutes to their own factchecks. So the organization does not even agree with themselves dude! It's not about what you or I think!


Is that so?

I understand why you won't corroborate your claim that Fact Check is unreliable, of course.
 
Is that so?

I understand why you won't corroborate your claim that Fact Check is unreliable, of course.

I actually agree with Factcheck.org 99% of the time.

I was merely pointing out that you Republicans don't believe even 1% of what factcheck.org has to say, because 99% of their factchecking is factchecking Donald Trump's lies.
 
you're saying its bad.

You've misunderstood. I don't believe it's bad. What I'm saying is we have a limited budget of oil to "spend." Right now, we've decided to burn it up, and it sell it at a low price to others. In theory, we could instead buy other countries' low-priced oil today, and keep ours in reserve for when supplies are tighter and prices are higher.

If you think of it as "energy independence," which makes us more "independent," long term:

(1) Exporting a lot of our limited resource now, or
(2) Holding it in reserve for later, when we really need it, and it's a seller's market.
 
Judge orders Justice and State departments to reopen email inquiry

hillary-clinton-beach-dress.jpg


A U.S. judge ordered the Justice and State departments Thursday to reopen an inquiry into whether Hillary Clinton used a private email server while secretary of state to deliberately evade public records laws, and to answer whether the agencies acted in bad faith by not telling a court for months that they had asked in mid-2014 for missing emails to be returned.

In a narrow but sharply worded 10-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth wrote that despite the claimed presumption of transparency, "faced with one of the gravest modern offenses to government openness, the Obama administration's State and Justice departments fell far short" of the law's requirements.

Lamberth wrote he took no pleasure in "questioning the intentions of the nation's most august" Cabinet departments, but said it was necessary when their response "smacks of outrageous misconduct."

Between July 2014 and March 2015, the State Department said in court filings that its document searches were adequate and did not mention unsearched records as it, proposed to settle the case. The agencies later acknowledged that additional searches would be needed, without disclosing that it had received 30,000 emails returned by Clinton.

At best, Lamberth said the government's actions reflect "negligence born of incompetence," adding, "At worst, career employees in the State and Justice departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this court."



https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-hillary-clinton-emails-justice-state-department-20181206-story.html
 
giphy.gif



America turned into a net oil exporter last week, breaking 75 years of continued dependence on foreign oil and marking a pivotal moment toward what President Trump has branded "energy independence."

The shift to net exports is the dramatic result of an unprecedented boom in American oil production, with thousands of wells pumping from the Permian region of Texas and New Mexico to the Bakken in North Dakota to the Marcellus in Pennsylvania.

U.S. crude shipments reached a record 3.2 million barrels last week.

The shale revolution has transformed oil wildcatters into billionaires and the U.S. into the world’s largest petroleum producer, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia.

The power of OPEC has been diminished, undercutting one of the major geopolitical forces of the last half century. The cartel and its allies are meeting in Vienna this week, trying to make a tough choice to cut output and support prices, risking the loss of more market share to the U.S.

“We are becoming the dominant energy power in the world,” said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research.

"Trump is making America great again," said Joe McMonigle, an oil analyst at Hedgeye Risk Management LLC and a former senior official at the U.S. Energy Department. "First president in modern time to get America to be energy independent."

Oil historians that have compiled annual data using statistics from the American Petroleum Institute showing the country had been a net oil importer since 1949, when DEMOCRAT Harry Truman was in the White House.





https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-06/u-s-becomes-a-net-oil-exporter-for-the-first-time-in-75-years

9edbd629-67e6-4a0f-9422-6fd6af6f0d10-large16x9_KUTVOffensiveClubJam022717.JPG
 
You've misunderstood. I don't believe it's bad. What I'm saying is we have a limited budget of oil to "spend." Right now, we've decided to burn it up, and it sell it at a low price to others. In theory, we could instead buy other countries' low-priced oil today, and keep ours in reserve for when supplies are tighter and prices are higher.

If you think of it as "energy independence," which makes us more "independent," long term:

(1) Exporting a lot of our limited resource now, or
(2) Holding it in reserve for later, when we really need it, and it's a seller's market.

which makes us more independant right now? you're all caught up on time. tomorrow never comes.
 
which makes us more independant right now? you're all caught up on time. tomorrow never comes.

It'll be interesting to see if DEMOCRATS run on restricting oil sales through government regulation, which risks raising prices to American consumers.
 
What a liar you are, Zappacrite. The irony is that you posted your own comments in the first thread in the series.

I suppose "hailing Obama" is not the same as "thanking Obama," right?

Now, dance!

Dance to my tune.

I don't see a single post from "Legion".

"Legion Troll" is a totally different poster.

Link to some comments from "Legion", prove me wrong.

For the record, I doubt you can.
 
Jobs not mobs

3357258_0.jpg



The U.S. labor market that is the hottest in decades.

The national unemployment rate held steady last month at 3.7 percent, a 50-year-low, figures released by the U.S. Labor Department showed Friday.

Wages are also up 3.1 percent nationally in the 12 months to November, Friday’s report shows, though that masks much faster growth in bigger cities, especially those with tech-heavy labor pools.

Four of the top 10 counties with the biggest wage gains in the second quarter of 2018 were in the greater San Francisco Bay Area, recent data from the U.S. labor department shows.

And across the country many labor markets are so tight it is pinching companies’ growth, according to anecdotal data released by the Federal Reserve last week. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, for instance, reported that “labor availability was widely seen as the biggest obstacle to short-term growth.”

Scarce labor pushes up wages, and “wage gains are likely to continue rising through 2019,” said Andrew Chamberlain, chief economist at online job site Glassdoor.



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy-jobs/red-hot-u-s-jobs-market-drives-some-to-seek-cooler-options-idUSKBN1O70NC
 
As far as I'm concerned, yes, different name = different poster. You can't cite even a single post where Legion "hails" Obama.

Laughable, Zappacrite.

If a JPP member violates Rule 12B and gets banned under that login, using your logic, they should be able to log in under one of their alt accounts with no repercussion.

Let's ask Billy if that's the case, shall we?
 
Laughable, Zappacrite.

If a JPP member violates Rule 12B and gets banned under that login, using your logic, they should be able to log in under one of their alt accounts with no repercussion.

Let's ask Billy if that's the case, shall we?

Good point. Since - according to Zappacrite - I'm a different person if I log in as Legion.

Legion Troll and I are not the same person. :rofl2:
 
Laughable, Zappacrite.

If a JPP member violates Rule 12B and gets banned under that login, using your logic, they should be able to log in under one of their alt accounts with no repercussion.

Let's ask Billy if that's the case, shall we?

Except we aren't talking about a banned poster.

We are talking about TWO DIFFERENT POSTERS, NEITHER of which has been banned and each entitled to post on the JPP forums.

But I applaud your attempt at diversion, it proves just how desperate you've become.
 
Back
Top