Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
because only right wing senate seats were up shit balls
lying sack of rat shit
Failbot, you do realize how dumb you sound right now?
because only right wing senate seats were up shit balls
lying sack of rat shit
because only right wing senate seats were up shit balls
lying sack of rat shit
1. Didn't vote for trump
2. Wouldn't vote for trum
. Not a tsunami a typical mid term
4. we are a representative republic not a direct democracy.
. Why did you not take the senate if your numbers were so high?
Don't believe it.
See above.
Not at all. Largest margin of victory in a midterm in more than 40 years.
This distinction is meant to lend yourself some credibility as you continue to make bullshit points and denials that no one believes are genuine or sincere.
Because of what Senate seats were up for election that particular cycle.
Democrats were defending 10 seats in states Trump won in 2016.
Conservatives won only 4 of those states.
That's 40%, which is an F.
And Conservatives lost two Senate seats, one of which was in a state Trump won in 2016 (Arizona).
The Senate popular vote for Democrats was even larger than the margin in the House.
Democrats received 16,000,000 more votes in the Senate, in the agggregate, than Conservatives.
2018 Senate Popular Vote
Republicans: 33,930,718
Democrats: 49,505,719
+15,575,001
2018 House Popular Vote
Republicans: 50,961,737
Democrats: 60,697,669
+9,735,932
Don't care
You should care because your sincerity is all that supports your points now.
So if you cannot convince me of the sincerity of your beliefs, how can you convince me your beliefs have validity?
If I'm not convinced by your attempt to be genuine, what does that say for the rest of your argument?
What I find suspicious is that you say you don't support Trump (now), yet you're defending all the principles and policy behind what Trump and the GOP have done.
So am I to just believe that it's a coincidence that you're non-partisan, yet you find yourself in constant and static agreement with just one exclusive side of the political spectrum?
You can't fool me. I see right through it.
About half the seats as 2010 and loss in the senate. you sure about that?
See me caring about your dumbass beliefs?
You should care because your sincerity is all that supports your points now.
So if you cannot convince me of the sincerity of your beliefs, how can you convince me your beliefs have validity?
If I'm not convinced by your attempt to be genuine, what does that say for the rest of your argument?
What I find suspicious is that you say you don't support Trump (now), yet you're defending all the principles and policy behind what Trump and the GOP have done.
So am I to just believe that it's a coincidence that you're non-partisan, yet you find yourself in constant and static agreement with just one exclusive side of the political spectrum?
You can't fool me. I see right through it.
Popular vote means nothing
I support some of what trump has done, I disagree with a ton more.
So this is that insincerity and dis-ingenuousness that makes it hard for me to believe you when you say you don't support Trump.
You know, of course, that the Congressional map in 2010 is different from the gerrymandered maps of 2018. You leave that out because you're inherently disingenuous.
You know, of course, that the Senate map in 2018 was heavily weighted to the GOP, with Democrats defending 10 seats in states Trump won, but Trump only got Conservatives in 4 of them after losing a seat in a state he did win (AZ). You leave that out because you're inherently disingenuous
And half the seats? About? Huh? Not counting the seat in North Carolina that Conservatives won through Election Fraud, Democrats gained 41 seats in the House, and netted out to 40. Conservatives gained 63 seats in 2010.
40/63 = 64%
Is 64% = 50%? Only in Conservatardia where Conservatives have to lie and exaggerate so they don't have to admit their beliefs are unpopular, that they're seeing themselves up for an electoral wipe-out in 2020, and that following that wipe-out, will be largely ignored in the national conversation.
It's important to your argument to establish insincerity as sincerity because you've tied everything to the veracity of your beliefs. So if those beliefs are just phony nonsense, then what does that do to your overall credibility? See, in order for your re-brand to work, I have to buy your sincerity. Well, I am not buying it. I think you're just a poseur who is looking to feel better about being a poseur by trying to convince people your sincere beliefs are genuine when we all know they're not.
BULL-FUCKING-SHIT.
Is there anything you support trump on?
Keep telling yourself that as Conservatives were wiped out at all levels of government.
10 seats in states Trump won...you only flipped 4, and you only netted out 3 because you lost Arizona.
3/10 = 30%
30% = F
Look dumbass, I don't give a FUCK what you think I support... I said "about half"
Nope.
64% is closer to 2/3 than 1/2, isn't it?
Time to move the goalposts!
This is exactly what I'm talking about when I speak to your insincerity. You exaggerate, obfuscate, and flat out lie about the perception, that way you can buy yourself some credibility in your argument; credibility that simply doesn't exist along the facts.
You're a fraud. A poseur. I see right through it, and I refuse to accommodate it.
I will ask you again, since you and I are being "sincere" and all that.
Name one thing you support trump on.
Would you like to wager? a grand to a charity of your choice if you win, a grand to fisher house from you if I win. deal?
you keep saying "you" making you look like an idiot. I am not a republican. I didn't vote for trump.