Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion

The fabricated, non-existent right of homosexuals to be protected from having to hear any opinion they don't like, hNy1hNjE1LTAwMDAtMDAwue[G]

Closet homosexual processing his nature and coping in the deep south ^^^^^ Just come out already. Then you can support what you should. ^^^^
 
I answered it already you stupid cunt.

No one deserves special treatment yet you believe faggots and a long list of minorities deserve protected class status. BTW, that's special treatment.

I'm far smarter than to expect a business to serve a product they don't carry. You, on the other hand, believe if they don't carry it, they should because you believe it's owed to you.

I'm not the one that thought a black BOY was qualified because of skin color. You did.

When is that lying POS going to buy the Volt he promised to buy?

Liberal counterpoints always amount to one of two off-topic smears: "You're mean" or "You're stupid." Thanks for demonstrating. Hint: Adult conversations involve something other than triggered lashing out (like actual counterpoints). You'll get there eventually.

GetAttachmentThumbnail
 
Closet homosexual processing his nature and coping in the deep south ^^^^^ Just come out already. Then you can support what you should. ^^^^

I'm sure that, among liberals, this simple-minded "questioning psychotically intolerant homosexual fascism must make you gay" posturing counts as some devastating refutation of the facts, but I'll wait for you to learn how to debate. ;)
 
This is common knowledge stuff, and it's off-topic. Spend ten seconds on Google.

Let me translate that:

I cannot provide even one word attributed to Jesus that condemns homosexuality...

...without opening a can of worms I don't want to open.

Grow a spine, Arminius.

If you are going to argue the position you are taking...argue it.
 
When the raghead bitch that wants to be able to wear her Muslim uniform was elected, didn't she agree to abide by the rules about head coverings?

You need to get a life of your own, and stop worrying about what women wear on their heads, pussy boy!

Stewing in your own shit about such trivial matters is dangerous to your own health and well being!
 
Let me translate that:

I cannot provide even one word attributed to Jesus that condemns homosexuality...

...without opening a can of worms I don't want to open.

Grow a spine, Arminius.

If you are going to argue the position you are taking...argue it.

Let me translate that: I avoided the topic by posing a phony irrelevant test, and then responded to the failure of my diversionary baiting by accusing others of avoiding the topic. Nice try, there, brainiac. :laugh:
 
The "I know you are but what am I" defense makes its triumphant return from the Kindergarten playground. :D

YOU are the one who wrote: "Repeating this phony posturing doesn't make it any less lame."

But that is exactly what you are doing.

I'm merely helping you understand what adult discussions are about.
 
Let me translate that: I avoided the topic by posing a phony irrelevant test, and then responded to the failure of my diversionary baiting by accusing others of avoiding the topic. Nice try, there, brainiac. :laugh:

YOU are the one claiming these "Christians" were having their "Christianity" violated by printing up some invitations for a gay wedding.

I am saying that Christianity is full of shit regarding the homosexual question. Jesus NEVER SAID A SINGLE WORD ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY...NEVER UTTERED A WORD CONDEMNING IT.

I realize that is an inconvenient fact for you to deal with...and you want to pretend it is off topic.

It isn't!

Hey, we're having fun though, right, Arminius? (Or at least I am.);)
 
Let me translate that:

I cannot provide even one word attributed to Jesus that condemns homosexuality...

...without opening a can of worms I don't want to open.

Grow a spine, Arminius.

If you are going to argue the position you are taking...argue it.

Grow a set of balls and stop hiding behind the ignore feature, coward.

If you're going to defend your position, do it allowing those you fear to get a say.
 
YOU are the one claiming these "Christians" were having their "Christianity" violated by printing up some invitations for a gay wedding.

I am saying that Christianity is full of shit regarding the homosexual question. Jesus NEVER SAID A SINGLE WORD ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY...NEVER UTTERED A WORD CONDEMNING IT.

I realize that is an inconvenient fact for you to deal with...and you want to pretend it is off topic.

It isn't!

Hey, we're having fun though, right, Arminius? (Or at least I am.);)

Jesus SAID "A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE UNITED WITH HIS WIFE" Where did he condone homosexual marriage by including a man and his husband or a woman and her wife?

I know that someone living in the negative doesn't understand how or why Jesus spoke in the positive.
 
YOU are the one claiming these "Christians" were having their "Christianity" violated by printing up some invitations for a gay wedding.

If I claimed that Muslims' religious rights were being violated in this way, would you respond with this same diversion of demanding proof that the Koran expressly condemns homosexuals, or just discuss the violation of one's religious beliefs (otherwise known as staying on topic)?

No matter how much you kick, scream, and demand that your BS diversionary test be legitimized, it will still be irrelevant.

toddler-tantrum2-500x270.jpg


I am saying that Christianity is full of shit regarding the homosexual question. Jesus NEVER SAID A SINGLE WORD ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY...NEVER UTTERED A WORD CONDEMNING IT.

Cue the introduction of Old Testament quotes and other things that disprove your irrelevant point. But it's still irrelevant to what's being discussed. Comprehend it.
 
You need to get a life of your own, and stop worrying about what women wear on their heads, pussy boy!

Stewing in your own shit about such trivial matters is dangerous to your own health and well being!

You need to get a life and quit worrying about whether a Christian business owner serves a bunch of 2nd class faggots.

You continuing to suck dicks may give you AIDS but that wouldn't be such a bad thing.
 
If I claimed that Muslims' religious rights were being violated in this way, would you respond with this same diversion of demanding proof that the Koran expressly condemns homosexuals, or just discuss the violation of one's religious beliefs (otherwise known as staying on topic)?

I am staying on topic, Arminius...and I am dealing with what has been already written. If you want to dabble with hypotheticals...do it with someone else.



No matter how much you kick, scream, and demand that your BS diversionary test be legitimized, it will still be irrelevant.

It is not even remotely irrelevant. But it is a hard one for you to deal with...which is why you are avoiding it like the plague...and bringing up hypotheticals about what I would do if blah, blah, Muslim, blah.

Cue the introduction of Old Testament quotes and other things that disprove your irrelevant point. But it's still irrelevant to what's being discussed. Comprehend it.

Oh...so Jesus spoke in the Old Testament?

Not in any of my Bibles. Which one do you use?
 
I am staying on topic, Arminius [except for the part where you are introducing an arbitrary test to qualify the legitimacy of someone's religious beliefs, rather than simply addressing the question of whether or not it is okay to violate them at gunpoint, sure]

...and I am dealing with what has been already written. If you want to dabble with hypotheticals...do it with someone else. [It's not about written vs. hypothetical. What is written proves you wrong. It's about comprehending the teachings vs. not comprehending them, not that any of this is relevant].

But it is a hard one for you to deal with...which is why you are avoiding it like the plague...and bringing up hypotheticals about what I would do if blah, blah, Muslim, blah [wrong again, Islam was brought up to enable your hypocritical and narrow mind to see an example of someone derailing a discussion on the violation of religious beliefs that you AREN'T bigoted against. Comprehend it yet?]

Oh...so Jesus spoke in the Old Testament? [Of course not. God, you're dense].

Which one do you use? [I am Agnostic]

Try again. ;)
 
If objecting to discrimination and persecution makes someone a pussy, and the left's entire existence revolves around hyperventilating over imaginary discrimination and persecution, does that not make liberals far bigger pussies than anyone.

GetAttachmentThumbnail

:lolup::rofl2:

You aren’t objecting to discrimination, you ignorant fuck, you’re advocating it. Imaginary? Are you now saying this incident did not occur?

Jesus, how can someone be as willfully ignorant as you?
 
Except when you are a liberal or a Muslim. Refuse to make a MAGA shirt? Zero consequences. Refuse to perform music in a city that voted for Trump? Zero consequences. A Muslim refuses to do his job and drive a beer truck? He gets to sue. Can't have it both ways. Either imaginary rights trump actual ones (what liberals assert only for Christians) or everyone has equal rights.

Try again, without the petty, self-contradicting smears. :)

GetAttachmentThumbnail

Your massive ignorance of anti-discrimination and civil rights laws is astounding.

Did mommy skip those topics in homeschool?
 
You need to get a life and quit worrying about whether a Christian business owner serves a bunch of 2nd class faggots.

You continuing to suck dicks may give you AIDS but that wouldn't be such a bad thing.

You are one weak little mentally stressed human being! Aren't you pussy boy? LOL!
 
:lolup::rofl2:

You aren’t objecting to discrimination, you ignorant fuck, you’re advocating it. Imaginary? Are you now saying this incident did not occur?

Jesus, how can someone be as willfully ignorant as you?

Screeching more autistic insults while repeating your already-debunked argument kind of speaks for itself here. LOL

And it's hilarious that the guy who can't comprehend plain English is the one who lashes out at others' intelligence at every turn. No, genius, I am not saying the discrimination I am citing is imaginary. Take a middle school English class and comprehend basic sentence structure.

:laugh:

I'll spell it out slowly for you (let me know if you need crayons): Liberals constantly pretend to be victims. It is at the center of everything they do. Fake racial victimhood, fake feminist victimhood, fake gender victimhood, etc. Obviously, that's what I meant by imaginary discrimination.

Try to keep up.
 
Back
Top