Put families on the street or raise taxes on the rich.

Again a right wng useful idiot speaks out of his ass since that is were his brain is at.



You do know that there were several levels of tax rates a the time, right? Do you even have a fucking clue as to how much income you needed to hit that 90% rate (and the top rate was 73%, not 90. It did hit 90 during the war). I believe it was a rate designed for one man, and that was John Rockefeller.
So, in order to be rich, one had to fork over all of his income to big daddy government.







My father was a iron worker in a steel mill, and I would love to have heard you talk about the poor quality of steel he produced. What you do, in your usual state of asinine ignorance is ignore the Chinese flooding the market with cheqap steel that destroyed the American competition. And why was it that brought about the build up of the Chinese economy?
And yet the US still can't make a seamless pipe.
 
Of course, tax cuts have never delivered on their promises.

Sure they have. Lower taxes=increased revenue because of increased activity. See what happens when EVERYONE gets to keep more of their own money? Oh, but I forgot. You and the rest of the delusional Left think it's the "government's" money.
 

Funny, every other industrialised society on the planet has single-payer health insurance and I haven't heard that any are going broke. In fact, most of them spend less on healthcare on a per capita basis and have better outcomes.

Then you would probably be happier working there and should move. :good4u:
 
Especially when they get it wrong. The Laffer Curve wasn't a prominent topic of discussion until late in Reagan's second term. Reagan cut some taxes but he raised others. The Left will never forgive him for cutting the top marginal rate but he had no choice but to do so given the circumstances at the time. None of the leftist fuckwits complaining about Reagan know why he had to cut that rate and that tells me none of them have ever owned or operated a small business in this country otherwise they would know why the top marginal rate is so important when it comes to S-Corps.

Trickle down is a RW myth. OTOH, trickle up is basic economics. The economy is driven by consumer spending. Give the poor more money, and they spend it. Give the middle class more money and they'll spend much of it and save the rest. Give the rich more money and they've already got so much that they don't know what to do with the extra.
 
Again, I ask you. When did increasing taxes ever help anyone? I can give plenty of examples where tax CUTS have helped the economy. Even one of your Democrat hero's did it. Can you guess who? And it resulted in a booming ecconomy and increased revenue for the government.
Typically, what happens after a tax cut is a few years of reduced revenue, then the normal annual increase resumes, but at a slower rate than before the tax cut. Then wankers like you start jumping up and down screaming that the tax cut resulted in increased revenue, even though it may take more years before revenue recovers to where it was before the tax cut.
 
1) The democrats have shown no qualms about wanting to spend significantly more money than we already are on new programs like free college for everybody and universal healthcare. The suggestion by you that they want to raise taxes to reduce debt is not supported by a single thing. They want that money to buy votes and make people more dependent on them. If they were worried about debt, they would support Trump's tariffs as they broaden the tax base.

2) Governments do not operate like household budgets. There is no indication that the US government has any trouble moving treasuries even at lower than current interest rates. There have been multiple articles and studies published should you so desire to explore them that explore multiple variations of this theme. In addition, debt is how the US expands the money supply. Without it, the dollar becomes destabilized which would then tidal wave throughout the global economy. Government debt is a good thing.

Universal healthcare or single payer health insurance would require increased taxes, but it would also eliminate health insurance premiums, so probably a net gain for most. It would also relieve businesses of the burden of providing health insurance for their employees. So good for business.
And single payer is the gold standard worldwide. Only the U.S. is so backward as not to have it.
 
This might be to[sic] complicated for you but I'll try ,your tax level has to be at the same level as your spending, now if you want me to explain that in simpler terms , come back and I'll bring it down the[sic] a third grade level. Which may still be to[sic] complicated for you people. Nice question.

Just a suggestion, but if you're going to criticise the intelligence and education of others, it might be better if your grammar and sentence structure (spaces and commas) were at least at a third-grade level.
 
Then you would probably be happier working there and should move. :good4u:

Also, why are people from Canada flocking to America for life-saving medical care? I could never get a liberal to admit that it even happens, let alone give an answer why anyone from a socialist utopia would even want to.
 
Just a suggestion, but if you're going to criticise the intelligence and education of others, it might be better if your grammar and sentence structure (spaces and commas) were at least at a third-grade level.

Just a suggestion, but it would be nice if you would at least attempt to refute an argument instead of resorting to infantile Grammar Nazi tactics.
 
Also, why are people from Canada flocking to America for life-saving medical care? I could never get a liberal to admit that it even happens, let alone give an answer why anyone from a socialist utopia would even want to.

It happens. But you wouldn't be interested in the details on why a few very wealthy Canadians go to the US.

More important, if you like what you have then stay with it! Universal health care for all the people has been proven to cause hair to grow on the palms of your hands.

https://nordic.businessinsider.com/the-16-countries-with-the-worlds-best-healthcare-systems-2017-1/

People in Luxembourg have to shave their palms every day now!
 
It happens. But you wouldn't be interested in the details on why a few very wealthy Canadians go to the US.

More important, if you like what you have then stay with it! Universal health care for all the people has been proven to cause hair to grow on the palms of your hands.

https://nordic.businessinsider.com/the-16-countries-with-the-worlds-best-healthcare-systems-2017-1/

People in Luxembourg have to shave their palms every day now!

A few? In 2014 over 50,000 Canadiens came here for healthcare. They did so because the treatment they required was not covered in Canada. Idiot.
 
Quora has it at 52,000. Here's a quote from Quora:

Roger Kinnard
Roger Kinnard, I am A neurologist
Answered Aug 9, 2017
About 52,000 Canadians left their country for medical care as Canada had a medical care system that ranked 10th out of the 11 medical care systems in the developed world. (As one Canadian said in this article, being better than the US is a low standard!) https://www.usnews.com/news/best...

To be fair, I have helped a few Canadians with very unusual medical problems seek assistance in the US at one of the top university hospitals. The Canadians who came to the US came with financial assistance from the Canadian medical system.

More than a million Americans left the country seeking medical treatment, and that included a number of my own patients. More than one million Americans will leave the US for medical care this year Unlike the Canadians with whom I had contact, the Americans left to get medical care that was affordable and did not get any help from their insurance company or the federal government.

We should have a good discussion on the topic, but like I said, if you like what you already have then stick with it.

https://www.quora.com/How-many-Americans-travel-to-Canada-for-healthcare-and-vice-versa
 
A few? In 2014 over 50,000 Canadiens came here for healthcare. They did so because the treatment they required was not covered in Canada. Idiot.

Are you interested in a decent discussion on Canada's health care system? See my post above in which I've quoted Quora.
 
Also, why are people from Canada flocking to America for life-saving medical care? I could never get a liberal to admit that it even happens, let alone give an answer why anyone from a socialist utopia would even want to.
"Flocking" is hardly accurate. But Canada simply doesn't have the population density to support large specialised providers. We do.
 
Just a suggestion, but it would be nice if you would at least attempt to refute an argument instead of resorting to infantile Grammar Nazi tactics.
I wasn’t trying to refute your argument. I was just trying to help you present your argument more effectively.
 
Also, why are people from Canada flocking to America for life-saving medical care? I could never get a liberal to admit that it even happens, let alone give an answer why anyone from a socialist utopia would even want to.

Maybe because it isn't happening. I live near Windsor Canada and Detroiters buy their drugs in Canada and save a ton of money. They also get medical care at far reduced prices. Canada was way ahead of the US in eye surgery and hernia surgery for decades.
I said it before, over a million Americans go abroad for surgery. It is called medical tourism and has been going on for decades. It is a huge industry. https://medicaltourismassociation.com/en/index.html
 

Yes they are. That is how revenue is produced. Back in Ikes time, the top rate was 90 percent and corporations ponied in 30 percent of the revenue collected. We have been slashing both those rates since that time. In Ikes time we built our highway system, now we cannot maintain it.
Our corporate profits are at all-time highs while their tax rates have plummeted and their evasion has been industrialized.
The wealthy have had the same treatment. Slashing tax rates and estate taxes have been going on making them wealthier than they have ever been. That is where the money went. Our wealth gap is worse than it was during the Gilded Age. It is doing legitimate harm to the country.
 
I am specifically talking about people keeping more of their money and spending/saving it how they, and not the government see fit. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say the Federal Government is responsible for cradle to grave socialism or providing for anyone's needs. That is up to the individual, not the government.
What a nut, two simple points there is no socialism in this country and definitely not any Communism, that just right wing talk for I'm as stupid as hell and I want everyone to know it. You are a fricken joke. You know nothing about socialism or communism. and that makes it easy for you to say stupid things when you literally have no clue what your talking about. It's that funny little clown car that runs around center ring, totally full of stupid.
 
Back
Top