DigitalDave
Sexy Beast!
Wow another lib tactic attack the source!
Another shit face tactic who lost an argument, act like the internet is full of truth and any source counts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow another lib tactic attack the source!
Another shit face tactic who lost an argument, act like the internet is full of truth and any source counts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Look, I get that you can't deal in reality, but I lost nothing, you have presented nothing to support your premise that I am wrong about who she is, or actually what she is.
how did he do that, we know she did
We all know she didn't remember the exact date but she did name the people who were there: Kavanaugh, Ford, P.J. Smyth and one who's name she didn't remember.
From Kavanaugh's calendar: On July 1, he scribbled, “Go to Timmy’s for skis w/Judge, Tom, P.J., Bernie, Squi.”
His own calendar proves that there was a gathering with the people Ford names. It's not conclusive evidence but it shows she didn't make up stories about these people getting together at someone's house to drink.
Good catch.![]()
The culture is changing. You won't be able to make excuses for assault or attempted rape as natural teen aged boy behavior.2
When a girl is locked in a room, pinned down, groped and a boy is trying to remove her clothing that's attempted rape. My God.. you should know that. What on earth were you taught ?
This post is when you know they are defeated USFREEDOM911
Lookie here! USFREEDUMBFUCK has a dicksucking water carrier.
Carrying water for one of the dumbest motherfuckers on the forum places you in rare air, turdlicker.
Or that your both dumb assholes who don’t give a damn for serious arguments. I’ve been on these boards for over 12 years, you don’t think I know how this works? Don’t be a sniveling little ass lick.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He’s a complete fucking moron and you’re carrying his water.![]()
[translation]
![]()
[/translation]
![]()
Still waiting for you to have some substance to your statement before a serious debate can happen. You can claim she lied about her accusations against Kavanaugh but you can’t prove that. You can claim she was paid by Democrats but evidence shows she has been seeking therapy for years. The timing of all of this becoming public IS political, the accusation itself wasn’t. Unfortunately, your tribal mentality blocks you from reason. You are more concerned about Kavanaugh, than you are about a women who was potentially raped by him. You’ve drawn conclusions without actually thinking about it, because you gotta protect your tribe. Then that conclusion you drew lead you down another path, fear. Just like your friend turd munch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lmao, I know flat-earthers who argue better than you. You have not once displayed evidence that you are not a biased observer to the entire situation and have rather provided evidence that you are exactly the person I described as a biased idiot who can’t use his critical thinking skills to actually come to a reasonable conclusion. You immediately went into attack mode on the accuser and went into your tribal defense mode to try and draw a conclusion before one can be made. Take your own advice numbnuts, when you go into attack mode, you lost. You did that by the second word in your thread title.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You know nothing because you weren't there.
You also seriously believe Kavanaugh is pure as the driven snow.![]()
I see Kavanaugh as telling what is true to him because he probably drank to excess that night and doesn’t recall the memory. I think that is why it is important to establish his drinking habits, that said, he will be appointed to the court. Most Republicans only care about lies when they pertain to a Democrat.
And you can claim that she told the truth, about her accusations; but you can't prove it.
It appears that you’ve drawn conclusions without actually thinking about it, because you gotta protect your fellow liberals and the DNC.
<see what I did there>
Hang on snowflake; he said he wasn't at this make believe party. Three others that were named by Ford stated the same thing. Why do you liberals keep lying and pretending that it even occurred when the people named clearly say no such thing happened....with them at least?
You do realize that the only one who had facts to back his claim up was Kavanaugh, right? Ford had NOTHING and the people she claims were there basically stated she is lying about that. If she is lying about them, and cannot remember even the most basic details like who drove her to and from the event, isn't it probable that she is lying about everything?
It isn't important to establish anything. Going back 36 years to determine one's drinking habits in college or high school were is moronic and evidence of the desperation the unethical and repugnant depths Democrats are willing to stoop.
When Obama admitted to cocaine use and drinking a six pack before class, I never saw ONE liberal suggest that this was a disqualifying thing for him to be President.