Kavanaugh should step down.

That was before everyone found out that he's a drunken, rapey lush.

The fact that he can't seem to go a few minutes without a drink should question his capacity for doing his job. Since he was clearly drunk at the hearing, are we to believe he wasn't drinking when he was hearing cases as a federal judge? So he's "qualified", but that comes without the knowledge of his alcoholism.

LMAO... so he has a long record of doing a great job on the bench, but you are going to pretend he is a raging alcoholic based on no evidence?

Also... not one of the women has accused him of rape. Not one.
 
LMAO... so he has a long record of doing a great job on the bench

But that is clouded now because of his alcoholism.

So how are we to determine if he did a good job since he has an addiction that would cloud his capacity to do his job? Why should an alcoholic sit on SCOTUS?


Also... not one of the women has accused him of rape. Not one.

That we know of yet...by his own admission, Brett would get blackout drunk. So isn't it possible he might have raped someone and doesn't remember it because he's a drunk?
 
LMAO... so he has a long record of doing a great job on the bench, but you are going to pretend he is a raging alcoholic based on no evidence?

Also... not one of the women has accused him of rape. Not one.

You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.

What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.
 
Yes. If he tried to rape her, he should be disqualified on those grounds. Even if he didn't, though, he effectively disqualified himself by showing that he lacks the temperament, gravitas, and capacity for political impartiality needed for the role. As soon as he started ranting and raving about the revenge of the Clintons, etc., it became clear he was not qualified for anything more than leading a daily Two Minutes Hate on Fox News.
but yet,

he's going to be a Supreme Court Justice
Isnt this a great country

where to quote a hero of yours, "Elections have consequences"

You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.

What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.

thanks for the suggestion, troll

but we'll wait, another few days is fine with us, we have nothing to do
:rofl2:
 
Hello Stretch,



That's glossing.

There is more to it than that.

Before this the fake mews drunken rape thing was the deal breaker. We've all already known that the Dems marched goosestep to "we won't vote in favor of this guy no matter what." Old news.
 
but yet,

he's going to be a Supreme Court Justice

I assume so. The only thing standing between him and a job he's glaringly unqualified for are a handful of faux-moderate Republicans like Susan Collins who traditionally vote any way the Republican leadership orders them to vote on any issue where their votes are needed, after enough hemming and hawing to try to bolster their image of independence.

Isnt this a great country

Yes. There's the chance to vote terrible people like Collins out of office if they install Kavanaugh on the bench. That's a great thing. Elections have consequences.
 
Before this the fake mews drunken rape thing was the deal breaker. We've all already known that the Dems marched goosestep to "we won't vote in favor of this guy no matter what." Old news.

Several Democrats voted for Gorsuch.

He didn't face any delays.

So there goes that shitty talking point...
 
But that is clouded now because of his alcoholism.

So how are we to determine if he did a good job since he has an addiction that would cloud his capacity to do his job? Why should an alcoholic sit on SCOTUS?




That we know of yet...by his own admission, Brett would get blackout drunk. So isn't it possible he might have raped someone and doesn't remember it because he's a drunk?

No moron, it is not. You are pretending that he is an alcoholic. Period. Saying he got blackout drunk as a teen, doesn't equate to him being an alcoholic today. Or at any time in the past 30 years. He has an astounding record on the bench. Even die hard liberal attorneys state that simple fact that you overlook in your faux rage.
 
You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.

What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.

You know why he has no allegations? Because he was appointed by a Dem. These accusations against Kavanaugh are unsubstantiated and no facts support the accusers at this point.
 
Hello Stretch,

Before this the fake mews drunken rape thing was the deal breaker. We've all already known that the Dems marched goosestep to "we won't vote in favor of this guy no matter what." Old news.

If our partisanship was not so polarized our government would work better.
 
No moron, it is not.

He said before that he frequently binge drank...his friends also say he was a binge drinker. One of them even said he was a "blackout" drunk.

How can he simultaneously be a binge drinker, but not an alcoholic? How can he simultaneously claim he never touched Ford while admitting he gets "blackout drunk" and goes binge-drinking?

We know his binge drinking was persistent through his HS and college years. Alcoholism isn't something that you can cure magically.


Saying he got blackout drunk as a teen, doesn't equate to him being an alcoholic today.

Sure it does, particularly when he gives conflicting testimony on his drinking habits. How often does he drink? What time of day does he start drinking? Can he provide any proof that he's sought counseling or treatment for his raging alcoholism?

You wouldn't want a drunk Uber driver, so why would you want a drunk SCOTUS justice?
 
You know why he has no allegations? Because he was appointed by a Dem.

Democrats don't nominate serial abusers and alcoholics.

Also, Gorsuch wasn't delayed at all. So the talking point that Democrats are doing this political obstruction is load of malarkey.


These accusations against Kavanaugh are unsubstantiated and no facts support the accusers at this point.

So what would substantiate them? An investigation not limited in its scope.
 
He said before that he frequently binge drank...his friends also say he was a binge drinker. One of them even said he was a "blackout" drunk.

How can he simultaneously be a binge drinker, but not an alcoholic? How can he simultaneously claim he never touched Ford while admitting he gets "blackout drunk" and goes binge-drinking?

We know his binge drinking was persistent through his HS and college years. Alcoholism isn't something that you can cure magically.




Sure it does, particularly when he gives conflicting testimony on his drinking habits. How often does he drink? What time of day does he start drinking? Can he provide any proof that he's sought counseling or treatment for his raging alcoholism?

You wouldn't want a drunk Uber driver, so why would you want a drunk SCOTUS justice?

Again you moron, binge drinking while in high school and college is fairly common. It does not equate to alcoholism. Care to cite any examples of his doing so in the past 20 years?
 
Democrats don't nominate serial abusers and alcoholics.

Also, Gorsuch wasn't delayed at all. So the talking point that Democrats are doing this political obstruction is load of malarkey.




So what would substantiate them? An investigation not limited in its scope.

Bullshit. Gorsuch was replacing a conservative judge. So they let it go. They are digging in against Kavanaugh because he is replacing Kennedy... a swing vote.

Again... you are blatantly LYING in stating that Kavanaugh is an alcoholic and a serial abuser. None of which you have any evidence of. This is absolutely a political hit job by the Dems. Only an idiot would think otherwise.
 
Hello Wolverine,



... by displaying poor character.

Not at all showing he has a pair! Dems have no idea what that means, we are talking about a man whose had his family threatened by poisonous evil demonrats, had his reputation and character assassinated!
 
You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.

What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.

You mad bro? You and your poisonous ilk in the Democrat party are evil, cheating, lying, snakes who worship at the alter of planned baby killing so spare me any talk about this being about anything but delay!
 
Back
Top