Psycho-pathology of Trump Supporters

Hello Thing1,

Thing1 said:
Birtherism wasn't really that fringe, and the much larger effort was portraying Obama as something "other," which basically everyone on the right tried to do one way or another.

It's silly to try to pretend psychosis about Obama wasn't the same - or about Bush, or Clinton before him. There has rarely been some sort of "reasoned opposition." Even McConnell said early in Obama's tenure that the GOP's job was to obstruct.
Click to expand...

It was an easy transition.

Tea party........birthers........deep staters
 
HillbillyStyle said:
Dont you mean the FREE healthcare he promised everyone?, just to get thier vote because thats what they do best, lie and deceive. IT wasnt going to pass until he got his layers to tell the court it was a tax so they let them go ahead with it, then we were forced to pay for it by the IRS, yeah that sounds like freedom to me.

Sent from my SM-G955U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I wonder who's sock you are. Since you use Tapatalk, it's easy to bet you might be Teflon. I doubt a noob would know to turn the groans off on his account.
 
Dark Soul said:
More of whom?
Click to expand...

if I were talking to mophead, I would probably say that if the masses were not publicly educated and spiritually molested and without understanding; the people would be 100% conservative and worshippers of Jesus in spirit and truth. it is coming in the world to come. in other words: the reason there are more damned democratics/ leftists/ liberal/ "progressive" fools is directly, scientifically provable to be the result of us gov. "educational" "systems"/ hell training centers.
 
Cypress said:
For native speakers of the English language, we are able to discriminate between denotation and connotation. Those are real things in the English language.

I do not literally have to see someone use the word "n*gger" or hear them speak directly and explicitly about white supremacy to be able to judge if they are racists.

Every rightwing poster on here who has ever said "blacks vote for Democrats to get free stuff" is telegraphing their inner racist, without actually making any explicit references to "n*ggers" or using direct Neo-Nazi lexicon.
Click to expand...
OR
"blacks want free stuff -because that's what Dems offer".
You guys hear racism in everything - i'm not going to debate this point - but political disagreements are quite often escalated to "racism."

Ask BAC. I'm a "racist"because I support Trump. You guys wear it out, and you do it for crass politics in many cases
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello anatta,



A bizarre way to try to paint Republicans as the more mature group.

Republicans didn't all buy into climate change denial at first either. But then, after a nice blast of propaganda, they are almost 100% against saving the planet.

Birthers were a similar 'fringe' until the latest fad: "Deep Stater."

It is still perplexing how intelligent Republicans can buy into this baloney.

It seems to be required, as a way to still support the president, despite the swirling waters of doubt around him, sucking him down, down, down.

But that's the power of propaganda.
Click to expand...
dude when you get a clue about systematic corruption at both DoJ and the FBI under Obama get back to me.
You ought to pay better attention to the Mccabe grand jury an the firings at the FBI. It's just getting started
 
Rune said:
Bullshit!

McConnell and Boner both said that their only goal was to make Obama a one term President you fucking wild assed liar.

Shut the fuck up
Click to expand...
moron. how can you be this stupid and still be breathing?

ALL PARTISANS always want a ONE TERM POTUS BY THE OTHER PARTY/ Legislative obstructionism was what McConnell was all about.

See if you follow this - the difference is the threats of Impeachment started the night of Trump's election.
capiche' and that was an attempt of de-legitimization of the presidency, not his agenda .. idiot.
 
anatta said:
moron. how can you be this stupid and still be breathing?

ALL PARTISANS always want a ONE TERM POTUS BY THE OTHER PARTY/ Legislative obstructionism was what McConnell was all about.

See if you follow this - the difference is the threats of Impeachment started the night of Trump's election.
capiche' and that was an attempt of de-legitimization of the presidency, not his agenda .. idiot.
Click to expand...

Drunk much, Fag?
Go suck Trump's micro-penis.
What a bunch of failures.
Why can't you ever admit you are wrong?
 
anatta said:
dude when you get a clue about systematic corruption at both DoJ and the FBI under Obama get back to me.
You ought to pay better attention to the Mccabe grand jury an the firings at the FBI. It's just getting started
Click to expand...

You never stop your BULLSHIT.
INDICTMENTS /CONVICTIONS under Obama; zero.

Fucking lying sack of shut!
Sit down and shut up.
 
Last edited:
Rune said:
Drunk much, Fag?
Go suck Trump's micro-penis.
What a bunch of failures.
Why can't you ever admit you are wrong?
Click to expand...
I was wrong about the severity of the obstructionism, It was absolute and yielded no bi-partisan legislation I recall.
The Dems don't want payback though, they want Trump's blood - his head on a pike.
 
anatta said:
I was wrong about the severity of the obstructionism, It was absolute and yielded no bi-partisan legislation I recall.
The Dems don't want payback though, they want Trump's blood - his head on a pike.
Click to expand...

Kudos to you for that.
I didn't think you had any honor left and for that I apologize.
 
Rune said:
You never stop your BULLSHIT.
INDICTMENTS /CONVICTIONS under Obama; zero.

Fucking lying sack of shut!
Sit down and shut up.
Click to expand...
I said systematic corruption of the FBI and DOJ - meaning a corrupt partnership of leadership. Not indictments.
I was specifically referring to this text (which is criminal leaking an ongoing counter-intelligence investigation at minimum).

an April 10, 2017, text from Strzok to Page in Justice Department documents saying:
“I had literally just gone to find this phone to tell you I want to talk to you about media leak strategy with DOJ before you go.”
https://nypost.com/2018/09/10/gop-o...e-conspired-to-unleash-a-media-leak-strategy/
Click to expand...
It goes much deeper, but I'm not in the mood for dot connecting. Note the date of the text is after Trump's inauguration, and the Muller investigation.
They leaked to smear Trump with "Russian collusion" Steele dossier crap.
Do you get any of this yet?
 
anatta said:
I said systematic corruption of the FBI and DOJ - meaning a corrupt partnership of leadership. Not indictments.
I was specifically referring to this text (which is criminal leaking an ongoing counter-intelligence investigation at minimum).


It goes much deeper, but I'm not in the mood for dot connecting. Note the date of the text is after Trump's inauguration, and the Muller investigation.
They leaked to smear Trump with "Russian collusion" Steele dossier crap.
Do you get any of this yet?
Click to expand...

I get that leaking is the oldest trick in the dirty politics book.
You act like Strozk invented it.
It is a well used tool by the lying class
 
Dark Soul said:
More of whom?
Click to expand...

More liberals. Conservatives are a shrinking demographic in just about every demographic except rural whites, whit evangelical Protestants and the over 65 group. The first two demographics are shrinking and the later are dying off.

http://www.people-press.org/2018/03/20/1-trends-in-party-affiliation-among-demographic-groups/

In fact in urban and suburban areas it’s become a serious problem for conservative men as upwards of 70% of women there identify as or lean liberal and a very large percentage of those won’t date conservative men.

This explains why a lot of conservative men are angry towards women and are either incel or MGTOW. Women in general seem to be unsympathetic towards conservative men as a common sentiment of liberal women, which is upwards to 70% of them in this country, when told of the plight of conservative men. In fact when women are told of the plight of conservative men having high divorce rates and an inability to find and keep a female partner is commonly expressed as “Good! I hope they die off.”.

Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the fairer sex towards conservative men. It als explains why a lot of conservative men are so angry. They’re not getting any.
 
Last edited:
Mott the Hoople said:
More liberals. Conservatives are a shrinking demographic in just about every demographic except rural whites, whit evangelical Protestants and the over 65 group. The first two demographics are shrinking and the later are dying off.

http://www.people-press.org/2018/03/20/1-trends-in-party-affiliation-among-demographic-groups/

In fact in urban and suburban areas it’s become a serious problem for conservative men as upwards of 70% of women there identify as or lean liberal and a very large percentage of those won’t date conservative men.

This explains why a lot of conservative men are angry towards women and are either incel or MGTOW. Women in general seem to be unsympathetic towards conservative men as a common sentiment of liberal women, which is upwards to 70% of them in this country, when told of the plight of conservative men. In fact when women are told of the plight of conservative men having high divorce rates and an inability to find and keep a female partner is commonly expressed as “Good! I hope they die off.”.

Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the fairer sex towards conservative men. It als explains why a lot of conservative men are so angry. They’re not getting any.
Click to expand...

actually 100% of the changes you claim are small enough to be within the poll's margin of error.......I will admit to not getting enough sex, but that's because of my conservative wife, not lib'rul women.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top