South Africa on edge of anarchy as president demands white farmers’ land is SEIZED

Havana Moon said:
I just get so tired of PC bullshit merchants spouting kumbaya bollox. Watermark has lived in an Mississippi swamp all his life and now lives in DC. He turned into a metrosexual, and thinks being a hipster is so cool.
Click to expand...

Like when have I ever not been a globalisation extremist? That's like the only consistent thing in my ideology I've held my entire life, I've always supported mass immigration.
 
Do the whites in Zambia have issues like this? You know, supporting Ian Smith and eternal white supremacist rule over Zimbabwe was not the only way to avoid Mugabe. Maybe if Ian Smith had just held democratic elections, instead of digging his heels in with white supremacy and stubbornly hoping to beat the Africans into submission. Then Zimbabwe would probably be a growing nation today. It was ian Smith who established an environment where someone had to be violent as hell to survive. Maybe he should've continued on the part of working towards majority rule?

Or maybe we should of held on even tighter right? Then maybe we actually would have had mayocide in Zimbabwe a few years back, instead of just land seizure.

Similarly, it was the resentful white South Africans who decided to abandon the United party, with its goal of working towards majority rule, and embrace the white power nationalist party in 1948, which quickly moved to throw all the blacks, coloureds, and Indians off of the rolls. They just couldn't accept anything but everything. Now they have lost everything.

They are lucky as hell that a figure like Mandela rose to the top of that pit of their own doing, rather than a Mugabe. But the resentment of people cannot be held at bay for all time.

Yes, let's invade south Africa and establish a second apartheid. Just as white power is waning and the power of Africans is beginning to wax. The whites are under no threat of genocide now, but pull that shit a second time and I'm not going to blame the blacks one bit when it happens.
 
Watermark said:
Do the whites in Zambia have issues like this? You know, supporting Ian Smith and eternal white supremacist rule over Zimbabwe was not the only way to avoid Mugabe. Maybe if Ian Smith had just held democratic elections, instead of digging his heels in with white supremacy and stubbornly hoping to beat the Africans into submission. Then Zimbabwe would probably be a growing nation today. It was ian Smith who established an environment where someone had to be violent as hell to survive. Maybe he should've continued on the part of working towards majority rule?

Or maybe we should of held on even tighter right? Then maybe we actually would have had mayocide in Zimbabwe a few years back, instead of just land seizure.

Similarly, it was the resentful white South Africans who decided to abandon the United party, with its goal of working towards majority rule, and embrace the white power nationalist party in 1948, which quickly moved to throw all the blacks, coloureds, and Indians off of the rolls. They just couldn't accept anything but everything. Now they have lost everything.

They are lucky as hell that a figure like Mandela rose to the top of that pit of their own doing, rather than a Mugabe. But the resentment of people cannot be held at bay for all time.

Yes, let's invade south Africa and establish a second apartheid. Just as white power is waning and the power of Africans is beginning to wax. The whites are under no threat of genocide now, but pull that shit a second time and I'm not going to blame the blacks one bit when it happens.
Click to expand...

:hand::hand::hand:
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Those are not mutually exclusive, both can be argued. The Confederacy was quite christian as was american slavery and christianity was leveraged to preach subservience to the master. Papal Bulls of the 1500s called for enslavement of the natives and ethnic cleansing of North America. You can claim whatever you like, the record is what it is. Sloganeering won't alter that.
Click to expand...

So you have no problem with the Africans that are being sold as slaves, in Libya; because it's just a Black on Black thing!! :palm:
 
Sailor said:
The topic was about South Africa. Doing exactly the same racist actions you are accusing others of doing. Makes no sense.
Click to expand...

The stupidity of 3 individuals, on this thread, just increased my Ignore list.

They added nothing to the conversation, except for insults and divisiveness.
 
Watermark said:
Do the whites in Zambia have issues like this? You know, supporting Ian Smith and eternal white supremacist rule over Zimbabwe was not the only way to avoid Mugabe. Maybe if Ian Smith had just held democratic elections, instead of digging his heels in with white supremacy and stubbornly hoping to beat the Africans into submission. Then Zimbabwe would probably be a growing nation today. It was ian Smith who established an environment where someone had to be violent as hell to survive. Maybe he should've continued on the part of working towards majority rule?

Or maybe we should of held on even tighter right? Then maybe we actually would have had mayocide in Zimbabwe a few years back, instead of just land seizure.

Similarly, it was the resentful white South Africans who decided to abandon the United party, with its goal of working towards majority rule, and embrace the white power nationalist party in 1948, which quickly moved to throw all the blacks, coloureds, and Indians off of the rolls. They just couldn't accept anything but everything. Now they have lost everything.

They are lucky as hell that a figure like Mandela rose to the top of that pit of their own doing, rather than a Mugabe. But the resentment of people cannot be held at bay for all time.

Yes, let's invade south Africa and establish a second apartheid. Just as white power is waning and the power of Africans is beginning to wax. The whites are under no threat of genocide now, but pull that shit a second time and I'm not going to blame the blacks one bit when it happens.
Click to expand...

There are over 4 milion whites in South Africa, whereas there are only around 40,000 in Zambia. Carry on spouting specious bollox so that you can be thanked by Black as Crap and Guano.

South Africa is being run by a bunch of thugs called the ANC. The Rainbow Coalition, if it every really existed, has broken down and the feared march to Marxist hell seems unstoppable. How long before Ramaphosa becomes the new Chavez and turns SA into an African version of Venezuela?

https://www.biznews.com/undictated/2018/01/10/anc-gridlock-2019-rainbow-coalition
 
maggot;
South Africa on edge of anarchy as president demands white farmers’ land is SEIZED
Don't these arseholes ever learn?
Click to expand...

Here he is , folks- the Brit maggot who falls over himself in support of Izraeli fascists SEIZING land from indigenous Palestinian farmers.

Brits are infamous for their hypocrisy. This diversionary maggot is a glaring example.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Wow, if that's what I'd argued you would have so disagreed here.
Click to expand...

No I would not have. I like discussing things with you Fentoine. Obviously we have our differences in opinion. I just want to state for the record that I have seen the worst of humanity and some of the best. From my own personal experience there are many more good people than bad.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you have no problem with the Africans that are being sold as slaves, in Libya; because it's just a Black on Black thing!! :palm:
Click to expand...

But about what was said that you were attempting to respond to here:

Those are not mutually exclusive, both can be argued. The Confederacy was quite christian as was american slavery and christianity was leveraged to preach subservience to the master. Papal Bulls of the 1500s called for enslavement of the natives and ethnic cleansing of North America. You can claim whatever you like, the record is what it is. Sloganeering won't alter that.
 
Sailor said:
No I would not have. I like discussing things with you Fentoine. Obviously we have our differences in opinion. I just want to state for the record that I have seen the worst of humanity and some of the best. From my own personal experience there are many more good people than bad.
Click to expand...

Yeah, me too, glad we got that cleared up, didn't know there was a question around that.
 
Sailor said:
Of course I do. Otherwise the term white and black and making the distinction would not be a part of it.
Click to expand...

White and black isn't the whole story.

Try oppressors and victims of that oppression. Color them however you chose but truth is still revealed. That's real hard for right-wingers.

The tables have turned and the victims of that demonic oppression now seek the stake in their own land that the oppressors took away.

Conservatives can't seem to figure that out .. but it won't matter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top