Trump is acting even more guilty than Nixon

rhym3pays said:
This coming from the people who clutched their pearls and fell onto their fainting couch in shock and disgust over Obama saying "knife to a gunfight"-- oh perish the thought..



Oh he definitely wanted to fire Mueller -- but his lawyers whom he later fired urged him not to...and before you called the NYT, fake news -- ask yourself what is Trump's fixation with always wanting to go sit down with the NYT?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html


Make your mind up? Is conspiracy a crime this week or was that last week?

There is enough evidence to warrant an investigation by a republican prosecutor, sanctioned by Trump's own Deputy AG and being investigated by Trump's FBI --- but according to Trump supporters, all of these people are under the control of Obama who also of course, the dumbest, weakest, in over his head, corrupt, criminal, terrorist kenyan, know-nothing president in the history of ever -- except he is also powerful and diabolically brilliant enough to make republicans investigate themselves and not him
Click to expand...

Oh my....we have a double winner today.

This post is EVERYTHING!

STANDING OVATION! :clap::snoop:
 
Last edited:
mak2 said:
Thanks, does that mean I get the parking spot by the main entrance?
Click to expand...

LOL well.........you have share with rhym3pays........his post was fire as well.

But you both can keep sticking it to these racist idiots who take up too much oxygen for real human beings.
 
Getin the ring said:
But the drivle you posted on intent but no results does?
Click to expand...

4/26/16: Mifsud tells Papadopoulos that Russians have email dirt
4/27: Papadopoulos tells Trump colleague
5/11: Trump aide Scavino tweets Russia has 20K stolen HRC emails
6/8: Manafort, Kushner, Jr meet w/Russians at Trump Tower
7/25: Wikileaks releases 20K stolen Dem emails

Napolitano was on Fox News just this morning saying that if Trump knew about this meeting and knew it was the Russian government, that it amounts to conspiracy.
 
Darth Omar said:
Dude, Trump has been saying Junior met the Russians to get campaign dirt for over a year now.
Click to expand...

When did he say that? Post the quote.

He said before that there was no meeting.

Then he said there was a meeting, but it was about adoption.

Now he's saying there was a meeting and it was to get dirt on Clinton.

So he lied about the meeting even happening, then he lied about the reason for the meeting. He only said this past weekend that it was to get dirt on Clinton.

Dude...do you not pay attention to anything he says?
 
Darth Omar said:
He. Did. Not. Get. Any.
Click to expand...

Whether he got any dirt or not doesn't change the fact that his people met with them to get the illegally acquired e-mails.

Then he lied about it. His son lied about it to Congress and the Special Counsel. Hope Hicks lied about it to Congress and the Special Counsel. They've all lied about it. And you are pushing their lies, which makes you complicit in them.
 
Darth Omar said:
Trump even told Macron about it when they visited. Trump’s contention that it’s not illegal, will stand, unless Mullet wants to roll the dice on it by bringing a charge.
Click to expand...

"No one in my campaign has had any contact with Russia"

That's a lie, right?
 
Darth Omar said:
Trump’s contention that it’s not illegal, will stand, unless Mullet wants to roll the dice on it by bringing a charge
Click to expand...

1. Trump first denied any contact with Russia
2. Trump then said the meeting with Russia was about adoption
3. NOW, Trump is saying the meeting with Russia was about getting dirt on Clinton, which isn't illegal, except that it is when you solicit illegally-obtained material from foreign governments

So Trump has shifted the goalposts several times on this.

REMEMBER, TRUMP SAID THAT NO ONE IN HIS CAMPAIGN HAD ANY CONTACT WITH RUSSIA

Hope Hicks and Uday also lied to Congress about that Trump Tower meeting. They're going to go to jail for at least perjury, and likely conspiracy since they knew about the meeting, and its true intent.
 
LV426 said:
When did he say that? Post the quote.

He said before that there was no meeting.

Then he said there was a meeting, but it was about adoption.

Now he's saying there was a meeting and it was to get dirt on Clinton.

So he lied about the meeting even happening, then he lied about the reason for the meeting. He only said this past weekend that it was to get dirt on Clinton.

Dude...do you not pay attention to anything he says?
Click to expand...

I was paying attention last July. Where were you?
________________

President Trump again defended his son Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian attorney last year during the campaign, saying in a news conference with French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday that "zero" improprieties occurred in a meeting that "most people would have taken."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ump-defends-sons-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/
 
Darth Omar said:
I was paying attention last July. Where were you?
________________
President Trump again defended his son Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian attorney last year during the campaign, saying in a news conference with French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday that "zero" improprieties occurred in a meeting that "most people would have taken."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ump-defends-sons-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/
Click to expand...

Here's the problem: Trump said "no one had any contact with Russia."
 
Darth Omar said:
I was paying attention last July. Where were you?
________________

President Trump again defended his son Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian attorney last year during the campaign, saying in a news conference with French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday that "zero" improprieties occurred in a meeting that "most people would have taken."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ump-defends-sons-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/
Click to expand...

We know exactly what the pathological liar said.
 
LV426 said:
And wasn't that back when the Trump explanation for the meeting was that it was about "adoption"?

It wasn't until Trump tweeted this past weekend that he said the meeting was about getting dirt on Clinton.
Click to expand...

That's correct.
 
Darth Omar said:
I was paying attention last July. Where were you?
________________

President Trump again defended his son Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian attorney last year during the campaign, saying in a news conference with French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday that "zero" improprieties occurred in a meeting that "most people would have taken."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ump-defends-sons-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/
Click to expand...

Here's the other problem: Trump said the meeting was about "adoptions".


So here's the evolution for the explanation of meeting with Russia:


  • Trump first he said no one in his campaign had any contact with Russia.
  • Then he said that they did, but it was about "adoption"
  • Then he said it was "very brief"
  • Then he said it was a meeting "anyone would have taken"
  • Then he said it was to get dirt on Clinton
  • Then he said he got nothing out of it

So you come a loooooooooooooooooooooong way around that mountain to go from "no contact with Russia" to "contact with Russia, meeting taken to get dirt on opponent, but not illegal".

Well, it is illegal to lie to Congress, which is what Hope Hicks and Uday Trump both did.

It's also illegal to lie to the Special Counsel, which is what Hope Hicks and Uday Trump both did.
 
LV426 said:
Here's the other problem: Trump said the meeting was about "adoptions".


So here's the evolution for the explanation of meeting with Russia:


  • Trump first he said no one in his campaign had any contact with Russia.
  • Then he said that they did, but it was about "adoption"
  • Then he said it was "very brief"
  • Then he said it was a meeting "anyone would have taken"
  • Then he said it was to get dirt on Clinton
  • Then he said he got nothing out of it

So you come a loooooooooooooooooooooong way around that mountain to go from "no contact with Russia" to "contact with Russia, meeting taken to get dirt on opponent, but not illegal".

Well, it is illegal to lie to Congress, which is what Hope Hicks and Uday Trump both did.

It's also illegal to lie to the Special Counsel, which is what Hope Hicks and Uday Trump both did.
Click to expand...

Why would Trump have said ‘anyone would have took the meeting’ if Junior was told it was about adoption?

Clearly, Trump knew, a year ago, that Junior *thought* it was going to be about dirt on Hillary.
 
Darth Omar said:
Why would Trump have said ‘anyone would have took the meeting’ if Junior was told it was about adoption?
Click to expand...

Because his game to say purposefully stupid things that his cultish followers will then try to explain away after.

Also, it was never about adoptions. That was a lie. Uday lied about that to Congress. He's going to jail for that.


Darth Omar said:
Clearly, Drumpf knew, a year ago, that Junior *thought* it was going to be about dirt on Hillary.
Click to expand...

Great!

So then:

WHY DID HE LIE AND SAY NO ONE IN HIS CAMPAIGN HAD ANY CONTACT WITH RUSSIA?

And

WHY DID HE DRAFT A STATEMENT FOR HIS SON SAYING THE MEETING WAS ABOUT ADOPTION?
 
LV426 said:
Because his game to say purposefully stupid things that his cultish followers will then try to explain away after.

Also, it was never about adoptions. That was a lie. Uday lied about that to Congress. He's going to jail for that.




Great!

So then:

WHY DID HE LIE AND SAY NO ONE IN HIS CAMPAIGN HAD ANY CONTACT WITH RUSSIA?

And

WHY DID HE DRAFT A STATEMENT FOR HIS SON SAYING THE MEETING WAS ABOUT ADOPTION?
Click to expand...

Okay lol.

What do you think the meeting was about? And what evidence do you have to back your conspiracy theory?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top