Trump is acting even more guilty than Nixon

[archives]

You’re missing the point.

If Mullet broadly interprets the statutes to snare Trump in a failed attempt at soliciting campaign dirt, he risks ensnaring Hillary and the Dossier right along with it. Keep in mind Hillary/DNC had an actual quid pro quo with the Russians.

Trump offered nothing and got nothing. It’s risky business on Mullet’s part lol.

It’s a moot point anyway because the courts would probably throw it out. Which means the whole affair is another media contrived Nothing Burger.

No, as I noted, there is no record of any member of Hillary's inner circle ever meeting with Russians for the sole purpose of getting Russian aid in the election. The same can not be said for the Trump campaign, and the fact they then spun numerous lies about the meeting makes it even more suspicious

And no one knows what was offered and what was taken, all we do know now is that it never was about adoptions as those present told us earlier

 

[archives]

Please.

You can keep your doctor. Benghazi happened because of a video. No new taxes. Etc etc etc etc etc.

All your etc.s you can muster wouldn't even come close to the Olympian rate record for lies and fabrications Trump has uttered, no where near the same ballpark, I'd even wager he has in two years lied more times to the American people than all the documented lies told by all Presidents in the history of the United States

Lying is a designed part of his schtick, his goal is to muddle what is actually true and what isn't so that he can define truth in his own terms

 

[Darth Omar]

No, as I noted, there is no record of any member of Hillary's inner circle ever meeting with Russians for the sole purpose of getting Russian aid in the election. The same can not be said for the Trump campaign, and the fact they then spun numerous lies about the meeting makes it even more suspicious

And no one knows what was offered and what was taken, all we do know now is that it never was about adoptions as those present told us earlier

There’s no record of Hillary’s inner circle meeting Russians and there’s no record Junior offered anything for dirt nor received any lol.

Let’s stick with facts: the fact is money changed hands in order for Hillary to procure dirt on Trump from Russians. It’s a fact. And you seriously think even many Never Trumpers are going to sit still while Mullet tries to broadly interpret statutes to nail Trump while ignores the Democrats Russian collusion right under his nose.

Tone deaf much?

 

[Getin the ring]

No, as I noted, there is no record of any member of Hillary's inner circle ever meeting with Russians for the sole purpose of getting Russian aid in the election.

you are braindead ^^^ aren't you, I thought they were kidding

 

[LV426]

There’s no record of Hillary’s inner circle meeting Russians and there’s no record Junior offered anything for dirt nor received any lol.

Well, hold on a second. Uday didn't have to offer anything in return in order to commit a crime by soliciting Russian assistance.

His crimes include lying to Congress and the Special Counsel about the June Trump Tower meeting.

Whether he got anything from that meeting is moot because simply setting it up with the intent to get stolen documents on his father's opponent, combined with lying to Congress about the purpose of it, is what makes him guilty.

 

[Truth Detector]

Today, 09:46 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 09:47 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 09:49 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 09:50 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.

Today, 09:46 AM snowflake jimmymccready, in an effort to remain ignorant and a moron ignored a member because he is a whiny little pussy on steroids and NO one cared.

 

[LV426]

et’s stick with facts: the fact is money changed hands in order for Hillary to procure dirt on Trump from Russians.

??? These are the last, fevered attempts by Lord Dampnut's cult followers to try and absolve him of guilt for approving a meeting his son and campaign manager had with Russians in order to get stolen, illegally acquired info on his opponent.

Then Trump lied about knowing about the meeting, then lied about what the meeting was about.

Now he's saying his people did meet with Russians, and did so to get dirt on Clinton.

So back when he said "no one had any contact in Russia".

 

[Truth Detector]

??? These are the last, fevered attempts by Lord Dampnut's cult followers to try and absolve him of guilt for approving a meeting his son and campaign manager had with Russians in order to get stolen, illegally acquired info on his opponent.

Then Trump lied about knowing about the meeting, then lied about what the meeting was about.

Now he's saying his people did meet with Russians, and did so to get dirt on Clinton.

So back when he said "no one had any contact in Russia".

 

[Getin the ring]

Well, hold on a second. Uday didn't have to offer anything in return in order to commit a crime by soliciting Russian assistance.

His crimes include lying to Congress and the Special Counsel about the June Trump Tower meeting.

Whether he got anything from that meeting is moot because simply setting it up with the intent to get stolen documents on his father's opponent, combined with lying to Congress about the purpose of it, is what makes him guilty.

Hillary and the DNC paying a foriegn national for dirt, lies mainly on a political opponent to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on that opponent, this is documented by the way, doesn't bother you? But the drivle you posted on intent but no results does?

I think we understand why your side loses so much now, simply amazing

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Today, 09:46 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 09:47 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 09:49 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 09:50 AM
Truth Detector
Verified User

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.

(Same here)

 

[Getin the ring]

(Same here)

9 years old?

Am I close

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Today, 12:16 PM
Getin the sty
Verified Loser

This message is hidden because this cretin is on your ignore list.

 

[anatta]

This coming from the people who clutched their pearls and fell onto their fainting couch in shock and disgust over Obama saying "knife to a gunfight"-- oh perish the thought..

whataboutism

Oh he definitely wanted to fire Mueller -- but his lawyers whom he later fired urged him not to...and before you called the NYT, fake news -- ask yourself what is Trump's fixation with always wanting to go sit down with the NYT?

wanting to fire Mueller is not even close to obstructionism.
He's a New Yorker, he read the NYTimes all of his life
( back before the NYTimes abandoned journalism for "advocacy journalism" = fake news)

Make your mind up? Is conspiracy a crime this week or was that last week?

a meeting is not a conspiracy. There has to be coordination for a corrupt goal. Trump team walked out.

There is enough evidence to warrant an investigation by a republican prosecutor, sanctioned by Trump's own Deputy AG and being investigated by Trump's FBI --- but according to Trump supporters, all of these people are under the control of Obama who also of course, the dumbest, weakest, in over his head, corrupt, criminal, terrorist kenyan, know-nothing president in the history of ever -- except he is also powerful and diabolically brilliant enough to make republicans investigate themselves and not him

partisanship is not germane, unless you think the fact Comey is a registered Republican has any meaning ( it does not)

 

[Darth Omar]

whataboutism

wanting to fire Mueller is not even close to obstructionism.
He's a New Yorker, he read the NYTimes all of his life
( back before the NYTimes abandoned journalism for "advocacy journalism" = fake news)

a meeting is not a conspiracy. There has to be coordination for a corrupt goal. Trump team walked out.

partisanship is not germane, unless you think the fact Comey is a registered Republican has any meaning ( it does not)

Comey was warning Democrats to not veer too far to the left a few weeks ago lol.

Some republican.

 

[jimmymccready]

The fact is that this is silliest statement of the day: "If Mullet broadly interprets the statutes to snare Trump in a failed attempt at soliciting campaign dirt, he risks ensnaring Hillary and the Dossier right along with it." The Clintonites never met with the Russians.

It's the cover up, stupid, that will drop Trump in his tracks; it's his lies.

 

[Nordberg]

How do you know its not without being privy to the details, methods and evidences? Talk about a pot calling a kettle black.

Mueller is a highly respected FBi official. He is well known for being honest and meticulous. On the other side is Donald Trump.

 

[Darth Omar]

??? These are the last, fevered attempts by Lord Dampnut's cult followers to try and absolve him of guilt for approving a meeting his son and campaign manager had with Russians in order to get stolen, illegally acquired info on his opponent.

Then Trump lied about knowing about the meeting, then lied about what the meeting was about.

Now he's saying his people did meet with Russians, and did so to get dirt on Clinton.

So back when he said "no one had any contact in Russia".

Dude, Trump has been saying Junior met the Russians to get campaign dirt for over a year now.

He. Did. Not. Get. Any.

Trump even told Macron about it when they visited. Trump’s contention that it’s not illegal, will stand, unless Mullet wants to roll the dice on it by bringing a charge.

And the only reason Mullet would do that would be if he’s desperate—because the statute has never been applied that way.

Which spells crap shoot in front of a judge or jury. Making crap shoot indictments aren’t the way federal prosecutors have gotten a 90% conviction rate.

 

[rhym3pays]

whataboutism

So hyperbole is only offensive if the black uses it? got it

Here is what you still don't address --- If I say about my supporters, I can do anything I want, including murder -- I am saying my supporters are cult like and have no independent set of values other than supporting me.. that is not a compliment

wanting to fire Mueller is not even close to obstructionism.
He's a New Yorker, he read the NYTimes all of his life
( back before the NYTimes abandoned journalism for "advocacy journalism" = fake news)

Spare me the "he's a New Yorker" BS -- trump craves to be accepted by the so-called NY elites, always has, always will...no one forces him to keep giving exclusives to the NYT -- he demonizes them for your edification, he personally is indebted the media because without them, he wouldn't be president.

and I didn't say wanting to fire Mueller is obstructionism, firing him would be -- wanting to fire him would speak to criminal intent -- just like the Lester Holt interview spoke to his intent of firing Comey because of the Russia investigation.

a meeting is not a conspiracy. There has to be coordination for a corrupt goal. Trump team walked out.

A meeting in which the stated objective was to seek dirt on Hillary from the Russian government, not some guy you know who is from Russia, but the RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT. A meeting that has been lied about multiple times -- as with Nixon, it isn't the crime, its the cover-up.

And not getting anything out the meeting doesn't exonerate you -- that is like me going in to rob a bank, guns drawn, screaming give me the money!! ... and finding out they were out of money, so I leave --- I am still getting arrested...but law and order only matters if it is someone that isn't Trump, because who will be left to hold rallies and tell you how slimey Mexicans are??

partisanship is not germane, unless you think the fact Comey is a registered Republican has any meaning ( it does not)

This is what they call "flailing" -- since you avoid to justify the idiocy of thinking all of this is an Obama coordinated conspiracy via republicans to take down Trump -- that is feckless if that is your argument

By the way, why do you care what crime Trump or his associates may have committed? You already support him getting away with murder

 

[TTQ64]

I don't think the other Republicans have the gravitos to bring Trump in line. I predict Muller will present damning evidence, the Republicans will pretend it is nothing, change the definition of words, and we will get 4 more years of Trump.

You win the internet today!

 

[mak2]

Thanks, does that mean I get the parking spot by the main entrance?

You win the internet today!