Trump news conference performance 'nothing short of treasonous'

ThatOwlWoman said:
Interesting how you call the media "screeching monkeys" -- it is Trump's fellow politicians and government cohorts saying "treason;" the media is merely reporting that. But you and your ilk blame the media every time the Great Orange Asshat sticks his tiny foot in his big mouth.

Please continue on your Twittler Apology Tour. It's almost as disgusting as your messiah.
Click to expand...

:thisisgettinggood:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Interesting how you call the media "screeching monkeys" -- it is Trump's fellow politicians and government cohorts saying "treason;" the media is merely reporting that. But you and your ilk blame the media every time the Great Orange Asshat sticks his tiny foot in his big mouth.

Please continue on your Twittler Apology Tour. It's almost as disgusting as your messiah.
Click to expand...

I do call the media screeching monkeys. Brennen is quoted in the OP and he fits right in the them.

They really out did themselves on this one—and that’s saying something
 
#102 IS a lie......that was merely the first in this thread.......you will deny them all because you are a worthless lib'rul...........just like the ones pretending they've never used the word collusion.....
 
christiefan915 said:
That's crazy. Which Democrats want war? I assume you mean those Dems in Congress.
Click to expand...
Dems are beating the drums of crippling Putin..what happens when a state is pushed into the brink of economic collapse along with having the 2nd most powerful military in the world?

Putin is a realist, but events can spiral out of control quickly + even if this avoided Putin is forced into Xi's orbit.
How does this benefit the west?
 
anatta said:
Dems are beating the drums of crippling Putin..what happens when a state is pushed into the brink of economic collapse along with having the 2nd most powerful military in the world?

Putin is a realist, but events can spiral out of control quickly + even if this avoided Putin is forced into Xi's orbit.
How does this benefit the west?
Click to expand...

I understand it is in your best interest to think people can be made to accept Trump submissive acquiescence of Putin, by attempting to float the specter of an unholy alliance between Russia and China.

It is the exact same trick Red Scare mongers of the 1950s tried to trot out.

A modern alliance is not entered into lightly, and an alliance is based on a profound set of mutual shared values. The NATO alliance being a prime example, but not the only one. Any alliance is doomed to fail if it is not based on a deep and profound set of shared values.

There is no - and never has been - such a context for a Russia-China alliance. Any military cooperation between them is fairly superficial, and is likely to remain so. Although it is in their interest to have dumbasses in the United States and elsewhere around the world cringing in fear of a dreaded Russian-Chinese axis of power - it serves their interests to create that perception. It gives them leverage, especially over the uninformed, and over dumb asses.
 
Cypress said:
I understand it is in your best interest to think people can be made to accept Trump submissive acquiescence of Putin, by attempting to float the specter of an unholy alliance between Russia and China.

It is the exact same trick Red Scare mongers of the 1950s tried to trot out.

A modern alliance is not entered into lightly, and an alliance is based on a profound set of mutual shared values. The NATO alliance being a prime example, but not the only one. Any alliance is doomed to fail if it is not based on a deep and profound set of shared values.

There is no - and never has been - such a context for a Russia-China alliance. Any military cooperation between them is fairly superficial, and is likely to remain so. Although it is in their interest to have dumbasses in the United States and elsewhere around the world cringing in fear of a dreaded Russian-Chinese axis of power - it serves their interests to create that perception. It gives them leverage, especially over the uninformed, and over dumb asses.
Click to expand...
ridiculous.. Even Nixon understood the benefits of triangulation with his ping pong diplomacy with China

Russia and China in the 21st century. Moving towards cooperative behavior
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879366517300052
abstract:

Political and economic rapprochement is taking place between Russia and China in a number of fields: energy, arms production, trade in national currencies and strategic projects in transport and supporting infrastructure.
This development, fostered by Western policies and actions, including sanctions related to Ukraine, appears to be strengthening despite reservations related to uneasy precedents, contrasting visions and uncertain economic projections.

Chinese policies aiming at European markets via the revival of the Silk Road assist this development. The One Belt-One Road is projected as an alternative, or supplement, to the maritime routes made unsafe by contiguous countries' unrest, criminality and the assertive control of the seas by the United States.

While Russia, promoting friendly investment structures, moves eastwards to develop the Russian Far East bordering China, the latter expands westwards engaging in laborious negotiations with Central Asian countries and costly investments in infrastructure and logistics.

In each area, the article maintains that both countries, despite economic and political competition and fear of losing control, have interest in cooperation and discusses the areas where this is taking place, albeit slowly and with difficulty.

Whether economic cooperation can develop into a strategic alliance including defence is discussed in the light of joint military exercises, arms trade and plans to broaden the scope of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (of which India and Pakistan have recently become members), and the Common ASEAN Community.
 
Darth Omar said:
I do call the media screeching monkeys. Brennen is quoted in the OP and he fits right in the them.

They really out did themselves on this one—and that’s saying something
Click to expand...
lol.. Brennan the howler monkey

121215_howler_free.jpg
 
Cypress said:
I understand it is in your best interest to think people can be made to accept Trump submissive acquiescence of Putin, by attempting to float the specter of an unholy alliance between Russia and China.

It is the exact same trick Red Scare mongers of the 1950s tried to trot out.

A modern alliance is not entered into lightly, and an alliance is based on a profound set of mutual shared values. The NATO alliance being a prime example, but not the only one. Any alliance is doomed to fail if it is not based on a deep and profound set of shared values.

There is no - and never has been - such a context for a Russia-China alliance. Any military cooperation between them is fairly superficial, and is likely to remain so. Although it is in their interest to have dumbasses in the United States and elsewhere around the world cringing in fear of a dreaded Russian-Chinese axis of power - it serves their interests to create that perception. It gives them leverage, especially over the uninformed, and over dumb asses.
Click to expand...

:thisisgettinggood:
 
Flash said:
I have read a lot. Whites without a college degree does not equate to "uneducated." They generally have a higher than average income. The groups with the lowest levels of education are Hispanics and blacks who vote heavily Democratic. Based on the generalization about Trump voters that would make these two Democratic groups ignorant, but only for those who are judgmental, intolerant bigots. If the Democratic Hispanic and black voters were criticized for being uneducated and ignorant they would be called racist, but it is somehow acceptable to make the same stereotypical comments about Trump voters. They can't stand the thought of being defeated so their defensive reaction is to see themselves as superior to those who voted differently than they did.

I don't share any of the political views of Trump supporters, but I can easily understand how they would vote against those who view them as ignorant because they do not have a college degree, hicks, racists, deplorables, and all the other offensive descriptions of those that pretend they care about humanity but in reality are full of hate. This hatred contributed to the election of Trump because they felt they were being looked down on by intolerant elitists who think they are better than their fellow humans.
Click to expand...

You didn't read shit.
The counties that carried Trump have endemic opiod abuse.
That is a fact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top