Why do you allow the lies?

By logical extension, could you not also posit that Hillary couldn't get non-voters to vote for her cult of personality that they rejected it?

You're the one reminding everyone that Trump won.

Yeah...he won the Electoral College. And he didn't even win it by margins as large as Obama did.

So he lost the popular vote to a woman, and couldn't win the Electoral College by margins even close to a black guy.

That must eat him up inside. I love it.
 
"Why are so scared, poser?"

Take it easy, US. Calm down. You are fucking up your posts.

It's funny how Conservatives call others posers when Conservatives come on anonymous message boards and fill their character backstories with more qualifiers than a D&D game.
 
I know now that you're not.

You do?

How's that?

Are you saying that the fact that you do not - thanks to secret balloting - know how anyone voted (or whether they did or not) means that hundreds of millions of citizens aren't American?

You never had any inclination to study American government or logic, did you?
 
If I'd said that the Electoral College is universal suffrage, you'd have a point.

Here's what you said:

"You oppose universal suffrage?"

That was in the context of me saying this (which is what you quoted from my post):

"It [The Electoral College] gives unbalanced influence to people who frankly don't deserve it."

So then why did you pose a loaded question about universal suffrage in response to me saying the EC gives unearned influence to dregs, if you didn't think the Electoral College somehow represents universal suffrage?

I think the answer is obvious; you're not an American, thus, you're not familiar with our elections.

Putin will be displeased with you showing those cracks in your troll armor.
 
Ummm...if you couldn't get them to vote for your cult of personality (still can't believe you decided to make that your argument), then they reject it.

By logical extension, could you not also posit that since Hillary couldn't get non-voters to vote for her cult of personality that they rejected it?
 
I defy you to find a post where I said you hacked anyone's thread or account.

Give it up. I know you are use to fails...but this is way over the top.

Unless, of course, you are just doing it to amuse.

If so...it is working.

It's in the thread, poser, or did you just respond without bothering to read or comprehend.
 
It's funny how Conservatives call others posers when Conservatives come on anonymous message boards and fill their character backstories with more qualifiers than a D&D game.

Yup.

Ya gotta enjoy them. They actually do provide laughs.

I'm gonna miss USF if they force us to ignore each other. His many fails are works of art!
 
That's it, Frank, try to project your own fear on me.

So sad.

Not sad at all. I'm laughing.

And...it is not projection.

Hey, that's okay. I knew you would never make the pledge. And if you did, you would never have kept it.

You are a jerk...but you make up for it by having no ethics.
 
You do?How's tha

Well, for one, you have this weird habit of running away from debates once they get to the finer points and details.

Secondly, you employ tactics like these, which are spelled out in the various articles and reports about the tactics used by Russian troll farms. "Sea-lioning", the practice of asking disingenuous questions in an attempt to frustrate and fatigue the debate, are chief among those tactics.

It's pretty obvious that you're a troll at this point.


You never had any inclination to study American government or logic, did you?

You're the one who thought the Electoral College was somehow linked to Universal Suffrage, not me.
 
By logical extension, could you not also posit that since Hillary couldn't get non-voters to vote for her cult of personality that they rejected it?

Hillary's not President, Trump is. You're the one reminding everyone of that, remember? Secondly, you said yourself that people vote for the cult of personality, not the ideas. Of course, that's bullshit. Candidates run on ideas. But that also means if you are an American, which I doubt, you voted for Trump not because of his ideas (he had none), but simply because of his personality.

So what is it about his personality that attracts you so much? The fascist authoritarian tendences, right?
 
That's what I asked. It appears that you are as ignorant of punctuation as you are of logic.

A loaded question.

What does universal suffrage have to do with the electoral college, which is not suffrage by any means?

You stupidly though that suffrage was somehow a part of the EC. And you thought that because you're not from here, are you?
 
Not sad at all. I'm laughing.

And...it is not projection.

Hey, that's okay. I knew you would never make the pledge. And if you did, you would never have kept it.

You are a jerk...but you make up for it by having no ethics.

Sure your laughing, poser; but it's nervous laughter of being exposed.
 
Hillary's not President, Trump is. You're the one reminding everyone of that, remember?

Ironic.

Secondly, you said yourself that people vote for the cult of personality, not the ideas

I did?

So what is it about his personality that attracts you so much? The fascist authoritarian tendences, right?

I don't recall expressing any attraction for "his personality".

Are you feeling OK? Is there someone nearby who can call EMS for you if you exhibit any more symptoms of stroke?
 
That's it, poser.

Look to find an escape from being held accountable.

I knew you would chicken out. When I took the bet...I was laughing so hard I could barely type.

And you reacted exactly as I expected. Like a child caught with his hand in a cookie jar.
 
Back
Top