You mean the theory that is being espoused today that could be replaced tomorrow when new "facts" are said to have been discovered?
A Civil Discussion: Evolution, Science, Theology, Atheism, Climate
- Thread starter Stretch
- Start date
You mean the theory that is being espoused today that could be replaced tomorrow when new "facts" are said to have been discovered?
Until you can provide the actual picture of my very grandfather you say I evolved from 20,000 generations ago, you have no proof.
Same logic applies to biblical scripture. Nothing to interpret if you know it a bucket of hogwash.
Frankly I agree that it was not metaphor, it was written by dumbasses who intended that shit to be taken
Strictly and literally. The audience could tie a shoe lace while chewing gum. And you fucktards worship that crapola.
Frankly I agree that it was not metaphor, it was written by dumbasses who intended that shit to be taken
Strictly and literally. The audience could tie a shoe lace while chewing gum. And you fucktards worship that crapola.
here is your whole family. https://www.google.com/search?q=mon...2YleXaAhVtdt8KHYi0BH8QsAQIKA&biw=1280&bih=615 You keep repeating that stupid meme like it is meaningful. It is not.
Yes. Professional science denier.
Then what you're claiming as facts really aren't fact. By definition, facts are indisputable. If, at a later date, you say the information you have replaces what you previously called facts, then what you had wasn't fact but merely a claim. When it happens again, the same thing applies.
What you're saying is that facts really aren't facts because they can be determined to be wrong but we'll call them facts anyway.
You keep being unable to provide the type proof I need to believe what you support. Until you can, what you claim isn't anything but what you want to believe.
I don't have any black people in my family. There is no way that's my family's pictures.
Thats why my post is full of question marks, pinhead.....I'm ready to be schooled on what information you can give me.....I didn't express any opinion on the origin
of the universe.....I say nothing on the topic because I don't know ...I asked questions and you seem to think you have all the answers....
All I know about the big bang is what some scientists say and it doesn't satisfy me....they don't explain it how it happened, they just claim it did....
Did nothing explode and became the universe ?....Are they claiming that everything in the universe just always was and exploded ? Eternal matter ?
How did all the matter involved in the this 'big bang' come to be.....
Give it to me in layman terms....you're so smart it shouldn't be any problem for you....
Last edited:
Right. I'm no expert on the subject. The point I was making was that despite having similar rates of mutation, species that are already well adapted will see fewer of the mutations supplant the population. Like some reptiles and sharks, their evolution has reached perfection and no mutation could provide an improvement that could best the current configuration. As a non expert, this is just my understanding of how evolution works and I understand that I have some gaps in my knowledge
Sorry, the big bang theory can't be put in layman's terms. It's irreducibly complex!
LOL
Nothing is too complex to explain. There are countless big bang explanations out there. You are hilarious. What you are is a religious science fan. You love science but only have a cursory knowledge of the subject because you deem it too complex to understand and you simply parrot whatever the high preists tell you.
Sorry, the big bang theory can't be put in layman's terms. It's irreducibly complex!
Oh wow, I just caught the Behe reference. LOL
the fact that universe is expanding implies a big bang
cosmic background radiation
"Precise measurements of the CMB are critical to cosmology, since any proposed model of the universe must explain this radiation. The CMB has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.72548±0.00057 K.[4] The spectral radiance dEν/dν peaks at 160.23 GHz, in the microwave range of frequencies, corresponding to a photon energy of about 6.626 × 10−4 eV. Alternatively, if spectral radiance is defined as dEλ/dλ, then the peak wavelength is 1.063 mm (282 GHz, 1.168 x 10−3 eV photons). The glow is very nearly uniform in all directions, but the tiny residual variations show a very specific pattern, the same as that expected of a fairly uniformly distributed hot gas that has expanded to the current size of the universe. In particular, the spectral radiance at different angles of observation in the sky contains small anisotropies, or irregularities, which vary with the size of the region examined. They have been measured in detail, and match what would be expected if small thermal variations, generated by quantum fluctuations of matter in a very tiny space, had expanded to the size of the observable universe we see today."
Of course why would anyone who thinks a sky daddy conjured it up, making the earth before light, separating lightness and darkness lol, and light and dark defines what a day is instead of rotation of the spherical earth around the sun, etc and the heaven was a dome and he stuck the sun and moon on it like stickers .....bahahaha, care about cosmology?
cosmic background radiation
"Precise measurements of the CMB are critical to cosmology, since any proposed model of the universe must explain this radiation. The CMB has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.72548±0.00057 K.[4] The spectral radiance dEν/dν peaks at 160.23 GHz, in the microwave range of frequencies, corresponding to a photon energy of about 6.626 × 10−4 eV. Alternatively, if spectral radiance is defined as dEλ/dλ, then the peak wavelength is 1.063 mm (282 GHz, 1.168 x 10−3 eV photons). The glow is very nearly uniform in all directions, but the tiny residual variations show a very specific pattern, the same as that expected of a fairly uniformly distributed hot gas that has expanded to the current size of the universe. In particular, the spectral radiance at different angles of observation in the sky contains small anisotropies, or irregularities, which vary with the size of the region examined. They have been measured in detail, and match what would be expected if small thermal variations, generated by quantum fluctuations of matter in a very tiny space, had expanded to the size of the observable universe we see today."
Of course why would anyone who thinks a sky daddy conjured it up, making the earth before light, separating lightness and darkness lol, and light and dark defines what a day is instead of rotation of the spherical earth around the sun, etc and the heaven was a dome and he stuck the sun and moon on it like stickers .....bahahaha, care about cosmology?
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Darth,
OK, so you're not going to comment on the fact that humans think they are so advanced yet other species have more free time than humans.
How convenient for your argument that you, a human, has decided what the parameters of being advanced are.
Can you stun a fish using sound you create with only your own voice?
No. You would need to use tools. Ah, but there are animals which not only use tools, they communicate, and store messages for for other animals.
OK, so you're not going to comment on the fact that humans think they are so advanced yet other species have more free time than humans.
How convenient for your argument that you, a human, has decided what the parameters of being advanced are.
Can you stun a fish using sound you create with only your own voice?
No. You would need to use tools. Ah, but there are animals which not only use tools, they communicate, and store messages for for other animals.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Micawber,
No, that's ridiculous. There are plenty of people who deny evolution and are also able to have very civil discussions. Such stereotyping lowers your argument and raises theirs.
Everybody: You have to respect the other side.
Americans: We have to remember that ultimately we are all on the same side. Stop treating other Americans as some kind of enemy. Remember: United we stand, divided we fall.
Cheap shot digs on the other side hurt America.
Contributing to polarization hurts America.
When you polarize, you are doing Putin's dirty work.
No, that's ridiculous. There are plenty of people who deny evolution and are also able to have very civil discussions. Such stereotyping lowers your argument and raises theirs.
Everybody: You have to respect the other side.
Americans: We have to remember that ultimately we are all on the same side. Stop treating other Americans as some kind of enemy. Remember: United we stand, divided we fall.
Cheap shot digs on the other side hurt America.
Contributing to polarization hurts America.
When you polarize, you are doing Putin's dirty work.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Yes well I think it's pretty obvious to anyone who knows anything about The Discovery Institutes History what their agenda is. It certainly isn't advancing science.