solid proof of evolution

you are right......it already has one......

Or 2 or 3. Look. I went to Catholic schools and was fed the same shit you were. I asked questions when they were laying thick layers of bible crap on my kid brain. They had no answers, just like you don't. They said just believe it and accept what we tell you. I was super religious and slowly pulled away. then I resented that they used fear to try and move me.That hell stuff had me laughing after awhile. They talked about the horrors and the fire and pain . When they said, the fires of hell shed no light, I laughed out loud, because it was obvious crap . Where did they come up with that? Someone went and came back and told them? I saw it was a cruel and outrageous attempt to terrify kids. I saw the game. It was always a game . It is a business that is just about money and power.
 
This pedagogical dogma is dangerously mad . Some of these JPP members ought to be chipped.
 
Are you one of those that takes the Bible as literally fact.....those of us with a brain realize that primitive people used mythological concepts to explain

what they couldn't understand with their limited knowledge or pass on story's that were handed down for hundreds of years before they tried to put them into written words......

Don't write mythology as unimportant....;)

https://www.thoughtco.com/myth-and-e...reation-111788

That's not something restricted to primitive people. Some of you are STILL clinging to mythology to explain what you don't understand. Filling in the gaps of things we yet don't have an answer for as "God did it" can't get any more primitive. At least our early ancestors had an excuse...no Google. ;)
 
Or 2 or 3. Look. I went to Catholic schools and was fed the same shit you were. I asked questions when they were laying thick layers of bible crap on my kid brain. They had no answers, just like you don't. They said just believe it and accept what we tell you. I was super religious and slowly pulled away. then I resented that they used fear to try and move me.That hell stuff had me laughing after awhile. They talked about the horrors and the fire and pain . When they said, the fires of hell shed no light, I laughed out loud, because it was obvious crap . Where did they come up with that? Someone went and came back and told them? I saw it was a cruel and outrageous attempt to terrify kids. I saw the game. It was always a game . It is a business that is just about money and power.


The Bible stories are important because they are teaching narrative... but they should not be taken as science or history. The message that is repeated over and over again is redemption.

The fundamentalists drive a lot of people away from faith.
 
It's certainly fine to think God created the universe.

But it's not really fine to ridicule those who think the universe came into being scientifically, when you believe in a being that just always was.

The universe isn’t somehow ‘less scientific’ if God created it lol.

Granted, the creative event itself would lie beyond science but the rest of the universe would be amenable to science. In fact, a universe that is the product of an infinite mind would be MORE ‘scientific’ because all the physical laws and constants would ultimately be based in rationality.

And what do we find?

Patterns, mathematical symmetry in the laws and constants. All the planets, asteroids and comets obey Newtonian physics which causes them to be as predictable as any Swiss watch.

All of the physical constants are fined tuned to such an extent that if any of them varied a tiny a bit I wouldn’t be sitting here typing this.

Biology is infused with rationality and it is more scientific on account of it. DNA functions exactly like computer code—except that ours is primitive by comparison. All cellular structures and events proceed in strict accordance with a *rational* code contained in the DNA molecule.

I would argue the universe is MORE scientific if it the product of an infinite mind.
 
Scientists tell us that mutations are the driving force behind evolution. It is also a scientific fact that mutations destroy genetic information. You are also faced with the problem of where that information came from in the first place. DNA is a language. Every scientific observation ever made confirms that language comes only from intelligent minds. So where did the language of DNA come from? I guess you believe it just evolved on it's own. Tell me. What do you think would happen if you made random changes in your PC's operating system? Would it run better? LOL! Fools!
Good lord you don’t have the first clue what you’re talking about. DNA is not a language like a computer language. It’s a self replicating molecule that provides instructions to other molecules the sequence by which amino acids are assembled into proteins. Mutations do not destroy DNA, what nonsense, mutations are changes in the base pairings of a sequence of DNA that proscribe how a specific set of proteins are constructed.
 
Or 2 or 3. Look. I went to Catholic schools and was fed the same shit you were. I asked questions when they were laying thick layers of bible crap on my kid brain. They had no answers, just like you don't. They said just believe it and accept what we tell you. I was super religious and slowly pulled away. then I resented that they used fear to try and move me.That hell stuff had me laughing after awhile. They talked about the horrors and the fire and pain . When they said, the fires of hell shed no light, I laughed out loud, because it was obvious crap . Where did they come up with that? Someone went and came back and told them? I saw it was a cruel and outrageous attempt to terrify kids. I saw the game. It was always a game . It is a business that is just about money and power.

why do you stupid fucks have to evangelize on the internet.......keep your idiotic religions to yourself.......nobody need to hear about your mythologies..........
 
By what? And how was that created? you are back to the ridiculous first cause . Making up a creature that made it all, solves nothing. Still have to find who or what made that one. And the one before that. Sorry, your answer makes no sense.
That’s not how you handle a pseudoscientist Nord. Much of science is counterintuitive and doesn’t make sense. In this case you need to only request that he provide you empirical evidence of a creator that you can independently verify. Then walk away knowing that it’s highly unlikely that your request will be honored.
 
Neither does yours. In fact, science says it's impossible. You cannot have an infinite regression of causes. There MUST be an uncaused cause that started the ball rolling. And a spiritual Being is not subject to the laws of the universe. So God does not require a creator. He has always existed.
Well fine but that isn’t science.
 
Do you have any idea what a blow it is to science to believe in an infinite regression of causes? There had to be an uncaused first cause. The law of cause and effect demands it.
No blow at all. It’s simply not science. Easy to accept as not science, dismiss as nonsense and to walk away from to go do real science.
 
You know what backs evolution? Everything. Absolutely every single thing science finds, backs it. The way science works, if you find something that contradicts the theory, you throw out the theory. Then you revamp it or discard it. So bring one fact against it rightys. that is all you need.

Everybody believes that evolution is an evidence-based explanation for the lifeforms that currently exist today. Nobody still believes in creationism and Adam and Eve just like nobody still believes that the Earth is flat or that early man walked with dinosaurs. Only uneducated idiots still believe that.

iu
 
Last edited:
Everybody believes in evolution these days. Nobody still believes in creationism and Adam and Eve just like nobody still believes that the Earth is flat or that early man walked with dinosaurs. Only uneducated idiots still believe that.

Agree, with one exception. We don't "believe in" evolution because evolution is not a religion or other belief system with no basis in reality. I'd rather say "we accept as reality" that evolution is an evidence-based explanation for the lifeforms that currently exist.
 
Well fine but that isn’t science.

I'd say it's not fine and isn't science. Because it's also illogical. The same fool Ugly truth who claims infinite causes can't exists carves out a big fat exception that god is infinite. The fact that he or anyone can't wrap their noggen around
the concept of infinite doesn't prove anything. Infinite eliminates any issue as to a first cause, just as does a complete chain. As to mutations destroying dna, I don't know what he is thnking
except maybe about free radicals and cancers. How he thinks this disproves evolution is anyone's guess. This ugly truth guy is obviously a lunatic turbo fundie archetype.
 
Back
Top