I would think so,with Homeland Security an such .. they aren't casual about passports
You know things like that when you actually travel.......!
I would think so,with Homeland Security an such .. they aren't casual about passports
You know things like that when you actually travel.......!
Mueller's evidence puts Cohen in Prague in late summer of 2016.
Passport means nothing.
He will be indicted for lying to the FBI and Congress.
Mueller's evidence puts Cohen in Prague in late summer of 2016.
Passport means nothing.
He will be indicted for lying to the FBI and Congress.
Does anyone including me and the prosecutors give a shit what garbage you provide, Fumb Duck?
The evidence is clear, Cohen was not in any Schengen Area nation in August or September of 2016 when the Steele dossier claims the Prague meeting occurred. You're done.
Mueller's evidence puts Cohen in Prague in late summer of 2016.
Passport means nothing.
He will be indicted for lying to the FBI and Congress.
Site such evidence?
Shengen countries require a passport stamp in the original country you enter, in Cohen’s case, Germany, after that, no stamp is required. You may request one but a stamp is not required after initial stamp.The evidence is clear, Cohen was not in any Schengen Area nation in August or September of 2016 when the Steele dossier claims the Prague meeting occurred. You're done.
Shengen countries require a passport stamp in the original country you enter, in Cohen’s case, Germany, after that, no stamp is required. You may request one but a stamp is not required after initial stamp.
[FONT="]A Squire Patton Boggs spokesman said Monday that since Cohen was “never an employee or partner of our firm, and since neither our firm nor any of our clients are involved in the government’s investigation, there is nothing to add to what is already stated” by prosecutors in a [/FONT]brief last week[FONT="].I think its interesting that Squires Patton Boggs dropped Michael Cohen from their international law firm which in fact legally lobbies for foreign concerns.
[FONT="]A Squire Patton Boggs spokesman said Monday that since Cohen was “never an employee or partner of our firm, and since neither our firm nor any of our clients are involved in the government’s investigation, there is nothing to add to what is already stated” by prosecutors in a [/FONT][/COLOR][URL="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4437375-Cohen-Memo.html"]brief last week[/URL][FONT="].
[/FONT]https://www.law.com/newyorklawjourn...-in-seized-materials/?slreturn=20180316150148
Shengen countries require a passport stamp in the original country you enter, in Cohen’s case, Germany, after that, no stamp is required. You may request one but a stamp is not required after initial stamp.
I guess they need to get their story straight, it’s very interesting.That's weird.. Look at this.
On the same day as the raid, Squire announced that the partnership with Cohen had been called off. “The firm’s arrangement with Mr. Cohen reached its conclusion, mutually and in accordance with the terms of the agreement,” the firm said in a statement Monday. “We have been in contact with federal authorities regarding their execution of a warrant relating to Mr. Cohen. These activities do not relate to the firm and we are in full cooperation.”
Squire’s alliance with Cohen, lasting roughly a year, was first announced in April 2017. A press release by the firm said it would partner with Michael D. Cohen & Associates to “advance the interests” of its clients.
snip
A spokesman for the firm on Tuesday described the arrangement as a type of referral relationship between Cohen and Squire.
But what exactly Squire or Cohen gained from the “strategic alliance” in the end is unclear. Two attorneys who asked not to be named said the firm kept them in the dark about any client interests Cohen was advancing for the firm, and said they did not observe his work on any firm matter. Some inside Squire were also ”concerned” about him being at the firm office and having his connection, one source said.
https://www.law.com/newyorklawjourn...was-discrete-presence-at-squire-patton-boggs/
I guess they need to get their story straight, it’s very interesting.
If Cohen entered through Germany, no other stamp is required to travel from one Shengen country to another, you can post all the articles you wish, it doesn’t change the law, no passport stamp is required other than the country of entry which was Germany.Unfortunately for your argument Cohen provided his passport and it proves he was only in one Schengen country in 2016 which was Italy not Germany and it only lasted from July 9th to July 17th 2016, but the Steele dossier claims he had the Prague meeting in August or September of 2016:
Upon entering the Schengen Area, visitors get a rectangular stamp with the date, a country code, their port of entry, and a symbol showing how they entered — such as an airplane or a train. In Cohen’s passport, that mark appears on page 17, with a date of July 9. The mark is too faint to be fully legible. The exit stamp, similar but with rounded edges, is also light, but the letters “cino” are legible, indicating he flew out of Leonardo da Vinci–Fiumicino Airport in Rome. That stamp is dated July 17.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/anthonycor...ssport-heres?utm_term=.mde32oaGqB#.nwN5bG8LRW
In pursuit of this aim, COHEN had met secretly with several Russian Presidential Administration (PA) Legal Department officials in an EU country in August 2016.
COHEN had been accompanied to Prague by 3 colleagues and the timing of the visit was either in the last week of August or the first week of September.
https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17236660/michael-cohen-prague-trump-steele-dossier
If Cohen entered through Germany, no other stamp is required to travel from one Shengen country to another, you can post all the articles you wish, it doesn’t change the law, no passport stamp is required other than the country of entry which was Germany.
Mueller's evidence puts Cohen in Prague in late summer of 2016.
Passport means nothing.
He will be indicted for lying to the FBI and Congress.