Ryan calling it QUITS!

Yeah, he was forced to run an ad in the paper afterwards saying that his places were open to all. That is because they were not before. Trump claimed the ads were a financial imposition he should not have to pay.

The case, including all allegations, was dismissed. He went on complying with the same discrimination laws as everybody else. Lefties get confused about this, so I keep it handy in my signature. Case dismissed!
 
I quote it often, so it is nice to have it handy. There are a lot of lefties here who like to use that case as evidence that Trump is a racist, even though it was dismissed.
That's not what your sig says. Unless you choose to ignore that unfortunate 'in consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility' segment.

And anyone who is familiar with the case can destroy you in a debate on the topic. You might want to do some research. Like what demands were required of the racist trumps before the COMPLAINT was 'dismissed'.
 
It wasn’t dismissed, the Trump’s settled:

The Trumps took essentially the first settlement offer the federal government provided, Kranish says; the Trumps did not, in fact, have to admit guilt in settling the suit.
"[The settlement] required the Trumps to place ads in newspapers saying that they welcomed black applicants," Kranish says. "It said that the Trumps would familiarize themselves with the Fair Housing Act, which prohibited discrimination. So it also specifically said they don't admit wrongdoing, but they did have to take several measures that the Trumps had fought for two years not to take."
https://www.npr.org/2016/09/29/4959...ed-by-decades-old-housing-discrimination-case

I guess I should have read more of the thread before posting.

Amateurs. They don't realize that they're in the big leagues here.
 
The case, including all allegations, was dismissed. He went on complying with the same discrimination laws as everybody else. Lefties get confused about this, so I keep it handy in my signature. Case dismissed!
Now all you have to do is to Google 'consent decree'.
 
The case, including all allegations, was dismissed. He went on complying with the same discrimination laws as everybody else. Lefties get confused about this, so I keep it handy in my signature. Case dismissed!

all you dismissed was honesty
 
Hard to believe it was only a few years ago that Weinermobile boy Ryan was considered the heir apparent of the Republican Party, a future GOP presidential nominee.

What an ignominious to end a career, having accomplished so little even with all the levers of power in his hands.

I always said that it was the Biden-Ryan VP debate in 2012 that sunk Boy Ryan's career. He was the presumptive favorite because he was assumed to be a genius - his opportunity to shine and shred Biden. But the old war horse Biden sliced and diced Wienermobile Boy to shreds, and made him look like a frat boy chump
YXkvlqY.jpg
 
That's not what your sig says. Unless you choose to ignore that unfortunate 'in consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility' segment.

And anyone who is familiar with the case can destroy you in a debate on the topic. You might want to do some research. Like what demands were required of the racist trumps before the COMPLAINT was 'dismissed'.

I am more familiar with the case than you are, I have done all the research. Like my sig says, the case was dismissed. The conditions were that he follow the same fair housing rules as everybody else. Only a bigot can think that following the same fair housing rules as everybody else was something special. You asked why my sig has the consent decree, now you know.

There is a special thread on this forum for people to post evidence of Trump racism, feel free to post any evidence you have over there: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?80126-Trump-is-not-a-racist

I'd love to debate you, see you there!
 
so you don't care why?

and you don't know ?


gee you looked deep into that one huh

I have researched all of it, and am familiar with all the details and documents. I know why it was dismissed, and I know that lefties will continue to quote propaganda articles about the case like moths fly into the flame. I know that you won't actually read the thread that I linked for you, and I know that you will only be able to quote more propaganda in the future.
 
I have researched all of it, and am familiar with all the details and documents. I know why it was dismissed, and I know that lefties will continue to quote propaganda articles about the case like moths fly into the flame. I know that you won't actually read the thread that I linked for you, and I know that you will only be able to quote more propaganda in the future.

so you know but you wont tell
 
I am more familiar with the case than you are, I have done all the research. Like my sig says, the case was dismissed. The conditions were that he follow the same fair housing rules as everybody else. Only a bigot can think that following the same fair housing rules as everybody else was something special. You asked why my sig has the consent decree, now you know.

There is a special thread on this forum for people to post evidence of Trump racism, feel free to post any evidence you have over there: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?80126-Trump-is-not-a-racist

I'd love to debate you, see you there!

The facts have been presented and you choose to ignore them. No helping stupid or dishonest. No point in doing it again, apparently too tough for you to follow.
 
The facts have been presented and you choose to ignore them. No helping stupid or dishonest. No point in doing it again, apparently too tough for you to follow.

Sorry pal, the case was dismissed. This fact cannot be disputed. The case had its day in court and was dismissed. You cannot un-dismiss this case.
 
Back
Top