Simple solutions to school shootings

It would be a different story if you ever had kids and they were gunned down in a mass shooting incident.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

No it wouldn’t.

Idiots like you calling for gun bans after these incidents is like calling for car bans after a drunk driver kills someone.

Stick to global warming. It is the only topic you have a modicum of intelligence on
 
It's not simple and your target is probably too broad for this to gain any traction.

The chance that this could be passed by Congress is virtually zero.

Your solution burdens/restricts the law abiding. If you actually want to do something, other than grandstand, i would suggest something more modest. The gvro mentioned in another thread is much more viable.
 
What is a Black Dad supposed to do when rioting, looting mobs of angry, 80 year old racist White men ... are trying to lynch him and his family? ... call the racist police?
 
No it wouldn’t.

Idiots like you calling for gun bans after these incidents is like calling for car bans after a drunk driver kills someone.

Stick to global warming. It is the only topic you have a modicum of intelligence on
Fuck off!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
First....the Fla. shooter did not have a modified AR15....it was a semi automatic rifle like hundreds of other semi autos made by numerous manufactures....most used for hunting....none are automatic and look as scary as an AR ....incidentally....
The AR in “AR-15” rifle stands for ArmaLite rifle.....the AR 15 just looks like an assault rifle...it don't work like a typical military assault weapon...

I agree that kits manufactured to modify any rifle to work like a military assault weapon should be illegal.....same goes for bump stocks...
If the law you want was in place this nut would not have able to simply buy the gun in a gun shop, true.....he actually had several 'mean looking' weapons, none were real assault weapons....

Quite simply, if the FBI and/or local police would have done the jobs, the murders would have happened in the first place and all this talk about changing gun laws wouldn't even be taking place....

He shot 150 rounds,killed 17 wound many others,was in the building a mere 6min.He had a weapon of war.
 

The only problem was it was banning AW look-alikes, along with real assault weapons.....as no real assault weapons could be legally saleable.....
a meaningless 'feel good' solution......

If the law was still in place the shooter couldn't have bought the murder weapon!
 
Two words: Black market

Here’s a novel idea: don’t pass any more laws for the criminals to break. But allow teachers to be armed. No, encourage them to be armed. Then put a sign in front of the school advertising the fact it is NOT A GUN FREE ZONE.

The deranged shooters will take the hint.

So all teachers need to carry semi automatic weapons is the right wing answer?
Sick motherfuckers come up with ideas like that.Part of the gun mentality of the right.
 
Was Wyatt Earp ' a friend of 2A ' ?

Before Arizona changed its gun laws, open carry was permitted except where prohibited by local ordnances . Guess what, you couldn't open carry (the only carry permitted at the time if you were a private citizen) in Tombstone.

Now there's an, interim, softened approach. Locals have the final say on who carries what on their patch.
 
Stick to global warming
.
b061bda4b10af8117168a596fa17d19c.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Okay, listen up NRA flunkies and republican/conservative wonks. To prevent shootings like what recently happened in Florida, you do the following:

1. Reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban. Had this been in place, Cruz would NOT have had an AR-15 in his possession.'

How do you know? Heroin is illegal yet people manage to get their hands on it. Prostitution is illegal yet people manage to fuck hookers.

2. Treat ALL weapons like an automobile. This means that they have to be licensed and registered, and the owner has to pass a written and physical competency test. This will severely cut down on the trafficking of illegal gun sales and greatly assist in the tracking of guns used in a crime.

Like you treat abortions, this places an undue burden on law abiding citizens because of the actions of a few. Your argument is rendered moot by the simple fact there are millions of these guns in circulation yet these incidence are relatively rare. You try to gin them up to further your political goals, but the facts are that relative to the number of guns in circulation these types of events while tragic are rare and banning guns will do nothing to make children safe from psychotics hell bent on destruction.

Got that?


Your OP is rendered irrelevant based on your faulty premise.

I am sorry that AR15s are scary looking for you. Nobody is forcing you to buy one. The sad fact remains that he could have caused as much destruction with other types of guns, that he chose an AR15 is irrelevant.
 
No one needs or should have a weapon of war.The second amendment doesn't mean anything goes!

that is nothing more than your opinion. it's about as foolish as the one I heard that those weapons can be owned as long as they are locked up in a state armory. that way if they are ever needed to fight the government, we can just check them out from the government.........

the 2nd Amendment is there to keep ALL government in check, so yes, weapons of war are most definitely needed.
 
So all teachers need to carry semi automatic weapons is the right wing answer?
Sick motherfuckers come up with ideas like that.Part of the gun mentality of the right.

we use guns to protect politicians, money, valuables, and government, but you don't want guns to protect our kids.........talk about being a sick motherfucker.
 
Back
Top