Life After the Memo

Русский агент;2211120 said:
Did anyone explain the Fourth Amendment at Auburn, Brad? You were pre-law there, weren't you? Does the exclusionary rule ring any bells?
Click to expand...

In your imagination, how was the 4th violated here?

No, I was not pre-law at Auburn.

If someone’s rights were violated collecting the info that would be a good reason the truth MIGHT be barred from a criminal trial... that’s not the case here!
 
Where does the dossier question the veracity of the memo?

Still no answer to that.
 
Brad said:
How was anyone’s 4th Amendment rights violated?
Click to expand...

That you continue to ask is a clear indication that your precipitous exit from the sphere of criminal law was a damned good thing, Brad.

Did you even last 6 months before you supposedly "found another job that paid better"?
 
Jarod said:
Does it say anything in the steel document was untrue? Does it even question the veracity of the allegations in the steel document? Who cares where the information came from if it’s the truth!
Click to expand...

who cares where the info came from? The FISA judge is supposed to judge the credibility of the dossier based on the sources not the credibility of the agent!

Are you sure your a lawyer?
 
tsuke said:
actually the memos say that the Steele document was the glue holding everything together.
Click to expand...

And that is where we get back to the "alleged," the memo is the creation of Nunes, twight light Uber trips to the White House Nunes, it is his interpretation on what he sees, not the Committee's, solely Nunes's, he reviewed thousands of classified documents and authored his view of what the documents say, in other words,"alleged"

Siting the memos, as "the memo say" is only conjuncture at best
 
archives said:
And that is where we get back to the "alleged," the memo is the creation of Nunes, twight light Uber trips to the White House Nunes, it is his interpretation on what he sees, not the Committee's, solely Nunes's, he reviewed thousands of classified documents and authored his view of what the documents say, in other words,"alleged"

Siting the memos, as "the memo say" is only conjuncture at best
Click to expand...

yes its an allegation by the memo. The russian collusion thing is an allegation by democrats. Allegations that are serious enough get investigated.

I did mention some other verified facts as well that point to suspicious FBI activity. I definetly think it warrants an investigation at the very least.
 
Русский агент;2211140 said:
That you continue to ask is a clear indication that your precipitous exit from the sphere of criminal law was a damned good thing, Brad.

Did you even last 6 months before you supposedly "found another job that paid better"?
Click to expand...

So you got nothing? I was over three years at the SA’s office.
 
anchovies said:
And that is where we get back to the "alleged," the memo is the creation of Nunes, twight light Uber trips to the White House Nunes, it is his interpretation on what he sees, not the Committee's, solely Nunes's, he reviewed thousands of classified documents and authored his view of what the documents say, in other words,"alleged" Siting the memos, as "the memo say" is only conjuncture at best
Click to expand...

How do you know, anchovies?
 
tsuke said:
who cares where the info came from? The FISA judge is supposed to judge the credibility of the dossier based on the sources not the credibility of the agent!

Are you sure your a lawyer?
Click to expand...

False, the judge is not directed to judge the evidence based on the source alone...?!?

What makes you believe the judge based it on the creditable of the agent?

Maybe the judge based her decision on the original source.. pre Steele.
 
Brad said:
False, the judge is not directed to judge the evidence based on the source alone...?!? What makes you believe the judge based it on the creditable of the agent? Maybe the judge based her decision on the original source.. pre Steele.
Click to expand...

"Her" decision, Brad?
 
It's clear now that Trump is running scared. If there was nothing of substance to find, he could let the Mueller investigation go ahead and find nothing. Instead, he and his helpers have launched a campaign of character assassination and innuendo, alleging conspiracy in the FBI, the Justice Department, the opposition party and the former administration.

All this frantic activity is at Trump's behest. What is he afraid of? Not even he is dumb enough to waste all this effort on nothing. It may not be Russia collusion, but it's sure as hell something.
 
tsuke said:
yes its an allegation by the memo. The russian collusion thing is an allegation by democrats. Allegations that are serious enough get investigated.

I did mention some other verified facts as well that point to suspicious FBI activity. I definetly think it warrants an investigation at the very least.
Click to expand...

Ah, no, the Russian investigation, which by the way was started by the Trump Administrarion and is being conducted by a life long Republican, no Democrats there, is based on facts, we know Russia did orchestrate an espionage effort to undermine our election. Nunes's memo is based on Nunes

That same Russian investigation in less than a year has gotten three inditements and two guilty pleas of top campaign officials, Numes's memo has just planted unsubstantiated innuendos, which was its purpose

And what you pointed to were inneundos generated upon at best circumstantial evidence echoed and erroneously assumed connected in the right wing media

Huge difference
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top