Life After the Memo

Tranquillizers in Equines said:
It's clear now that Trump is running scared. If there was nothing of substance to find, he could let the Mueller investigation go ahead and find nothing. Instead, he and his helpers have launched a campaign of character assassination and innuendo, alleging conspiracy in the FBI, the Justice Department, the opposition party and the former administration. All this frantic activity is at Trump's behest. What is he afraid of? Not even he is dumb enough to waste all this effort on nothing. It may not be Russia collusion, but it's sure as hell something.
Click to expand...

Follow the evidence.
 
anchovies said:
Ah, no, the Russian investigation, which by the way was started by the Trump Administrarion and is being conducted by a life long Republican, no Democrats there, is based on facts, we know Russia did orchestrate an espionage effort to undermine our election. Nunes's memo is based on Nunes That same Russian investigation in less than a year has gotten three inditements and two guilty pleas of top campaign officials, Numes's memo has just planted unsubstantiated innuendos, which was its purpose And what you pointed to were inneundos generated upon at best circumstantial evidence echoed and erroneously assumed connected in the right wing media Huge difference
Click to expand...

Top campaign officials?

Hilarious.

It's cute that you think Republicans can't be opposed to Trump, anchovies.
 
Русский агент;2211203 said:
Top campaign officials?

Hilarious.

It's cute that you think Republicans can't be opposed to Trump, anchovies.
Click to expand...

Oh, I guess campaign manager, assistant campaign manager, and National Security Advisor are gophers, next
 
Русский агент;2211174 said:
Before you allegedly "left voluntarily" or before you were called on the carpet and placed on restricted duties due to a "misunderstanding"?
Click to expand...

Sorry, I had a perfect record. You are confusing me with someone else.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
It's clear now that Trump is running scared. If there was nothing of substance to find, he could let the Mueller investigation go ahead and find nothing. Instead, he and his helpers have launched a campaign of character assassination and innuendo, alleging conspiracy in the FBI, the Justice Department, the opposition party and the former administration.

All this frantic activity is at Trump's behest. What is he afraid of? Not even he is dumb enough to waste all this effort on nothing. It may not be Russia collusion, but it's sure as hell something.
Click to expand...

Yup
 
tsuke said:
the podo guy was mentioned in passing once and then not again till after trump won.
Click to expand...

BBIJm1o.img


Even at best reading the FBI never mentioned that the funders were the Clinton campiagn and the DNC just politcal opponents.
Click to expand...

Exactly who would you think political opposition to a republican would be .. and what makes you think opposition research wouldn't be investigated by the courts?

Also again the FBI did not verify the credibility the sources. They just said steele was credible so they were.
Click to expand...

What you ask is the normal processes of identification and investigation that FISA was setup to do.

I have a question .. why not wait until the investigation has been completed?

I have another question .. what about this, and who do you think approved it?

Americans Wanted More Privacy Protections. Congress Gave Them Fewer.
You don’t have to be a criminal or a terrorist to be affected by Congress’ Section 702 surveillance expansion.
January 26, 2018

Last week, Congress passed a bill to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act for six years. Section 702 is the surveillance law that authorizes the government to target foreigners located abroad to collect foreign intelligence information. However, we know that the government also sweeps up substantial quantities of Americans’ communications under Section 702. Despite the public’s calls for additional privacy protections, Congress passed the bill and called it a reform while hoping that no one would notice that it actually increases privacy risks. And you don’t have to be a criminal or a terrorist to be caught up in the government’s web. The law now authorizes several ways for the government to collect and use an average American’s communications.

One of the major misconceptions about Section 702 surveillance is the breadth of its purposes. The government always focuses on the authority’s uses for combatting national security threats like terrorism and espionage. However, the definition of foreign intelligence information that may be collected includes anything that is relevant to U.S. foreign affairs, which means that foreign journalists, activists, scientists, doctors, lawyers, and businesspeople could be targeted. Even when the government is targeting a person abroad as part of its counterterrorism efforts, the target is not necessarily a “bad guy.” The targets need only have information that is relevant to the government’s foreign intelligence objective. There are plenty of non-nefarious reasons a person, such as a journalist covering the civil war in Syria or a human rights activist working to resettle refugees, might have that kind of information.

Any American who is in touch with one of the more than 106,000 targets—regardless of whether the target is a “bad guy” or the communication relates to national security or foreign affairs—will have their emails and phone calls with that target swept up. The bill does nothing to limit this “incidental” collection of Americans’ communications. It may even increase this collection because it codifies, and may even expand, “abouts” collection, which allows the government to collect communications that are “about” a target, such as where they contain the target’s email or phone number in the contents of a communication, even when the target isn’t a party to the communication. The FISA Court has twice forced the government to stop this form of collection, most recently last spring, because the level of incidental collection of Americans’ communications, including wholly domestic communications, raised significant constitutional concerns. The government had systematically and persistently violated court-imposed rules to address those concerns.

more
https://slate.com/technology/2018/0...of-the-fisa-is-an-expansion-not-a-reform.html

Now that Trump has been caught in it, suddenly FISA is evil, and a KNOWN Russian operative is a saint.
 
Русский агент;2211222 said:
Prove it, Brad.

BTW, if the FISA warrant was granted based on unconstitutional grounds/official misrepresentation, what is the likely legal status of any evidence it may have produced?
Click to expand...

You have some evidence that the warrant was granted based on unconstitutional grounds or official misrepresentation? You should call the media!
 
Русский агент;2211225 said:
Easy for you to claim, knowing that I can't reveal the truth, Brad.

I happen to know that you had "a perfect record" - of being sorry. :D

BTW, what's your Avvo rating right now?
Click to expand...
The only reason you can’t reveal the truth is because you don’t have the truth.
 
Brad said:
You have some evidence that the warrant was granted based on unconstitutional grounds or official misrepresentation? You should call the media!
Click to expand...

The media already suspects it, Brad.

More to the point, so do member of Congress and other officials, and they are in the process of determine the facts.
 
Русский агент;2211256 said:
So you say, Brad. Many JPP posters who are only familiar with you though your history here may suspect what I know to be true.
Click to expand...

im sure brad is a child molester but can we not doxx him?
 
Русский агент;2211252 said:
The media already suspects it, Brad.

More to the point, so do member of Congress and other officials, and they are in the process of determine the facts.
Click to expand...

SO, you admit so far its just unfounded suspicion?
 
Русский агент;2211256 said:
So you say, Brad. Many JPP posters who are only familiar with you though your history here may suspect what I know to be true.
Click to expand...

What do you know to be true? Nothing I suspect. Share! Go ahead...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top