Are you saying the Commerce Clause wan't put into the Constitution until 1942?
are you saying the case I linked to did not increase the power of the Commerce Clause via court precedent?
Are you saying the Commerce Clause wan't put into the Constitution until 1942?
are you saying the case I linked to did not increase the power of the Commerce Clause via court precedent?
If YOU believe their claims ... then what's your issue with legalizing it?
That's an unsubstantiated contradiction, a dismissal, not a refutation.
If your assertion were true you'd be able to cite one factual error, and correct it.
We both know you won't.
The remainder of your spew is self-righteous ignorance, premised on falsehoods.
Did I say I believe their claims?
I haven’t taken a position one way or the other with regards to legalizing pot
I am merely shredding bogus arguments.
If people would just be honest and claim they just wanna get high, I could respect their position. But as such they hide behind bogus claims of medicinal properties.
Sure it increased it but it didn't put it in the Constitution. It's been there since 1787.
If you read the why from those supporting prohibition being done as an amendment rather than a law passed by Congress, you may understand, although put in as an amendment, it didn't have to be done that way. If you understood the difference in the process of amending/repealing an amendment vs. that of a law passed by Congress, it would go a long way in helping you see why, although not necessary, the push was for an amendment.
If people would just be honest and claim they just wanna get high, I could respect their position. But as such they hide behind bogus claims of medicinal properties.
yes, the why is without, they would of had to go to each of the 50 states and passed legislation at the state level. That would of been very long and time consuming. (and probably impossible)
And now? interstate commerce includes activity that is neither cross state lines, nor commerce. And you support that Orwellian bullshit because you truly are an asshole
Medical applications is how they got the foot in the door, so to speak.
It's been legalized for recreational use, so any "pretense" is gone.
The fact that you think one can control the dose of inhaling marijuana more than what is in Marinol is steeped in ignorance. I stand by my statement
Just admit all ya wanna do is get high. I won’t judge you
Medical applications is how they got the foot in the door, so to speak.
It's been legalized for recreational use, so any "pretense" is gone.
I expected a stupid answer and got one.
The asshole and liar is you, son. You say it isn't about you which makes you a liar. That you lie about it makes you an asshole.
As I accurately pointed out, the entire medical marijuana thing was a scam to move toward legalization
As I accurately pointed out, the entire medical marijuana thing was a scam to move toward legalization
Did I say I believe their claims?
I haven’t taken a position one way or the other with regards to legalizing pot
I am merely shredding bogus arguments.
If people would just be honest and claim they just wanna get high, I could respect their position. But as such they hide behind bogus claims of medicinal properties.
Interesting how YOU show up right after being referenced in a post to someone else.
Everyone can conclude from your statements that you have no problem with people driving drunk.
If you think smoking pot is a right, YOU amend the Constitution.
I believe he is an equal opportunity poster, both sides believe he is an idiot.
blablabla. liar and a pussy. if only there was a god. power brokers such as yourself would certainly find a special place in hell
here's proof that you either have zero clue about the constitution or just don't give a fuck about it.