Trump Administration moves to end legal marijuana.

[Bigdog]

Then why not let kids use it? You know if it is so “harmless”

Did you let your kids smoke your weed with you? Their friends?

It’s harmless family fun right?

Why not treat MJ the same as Alcohol and tobacco?

There is no rational reason to NOT treat it the same way.

 

[CFM]

This is silly. I never said sunburns were not in any way dangerous, I said that they are not the same thing as sitting in a pool of gasoline and setting yourself on fire. This doesn't "prove" anything, it is a non-sequitur.

Nothing silly about it. I showed where they can be just as dangerous.

Are you saying 2nd and 3rd degree burns from a sunburn aren't as severe as 2nd and 3rd degrees burns from a gasoline fire? That's either what you have to say or your original statement is inaccurate.

 

[CFM]

"Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia currently have laws broadly legalizing marijuana in some form. Seven states and the District of Columbia have adopted the most expansive laws legalizing marijuana for recreational use."

Washington D.C. needs to change the Federal law and butt out of the States' business on this one. It's time.

Oh, another one that thinks a law is stupid based on personal preference rather than a valid argument.

 

[CFM]

We have dui laws, so yeah, treat it like any under the influence offense.

You mean slap them on the wrist like drunk drivers when they permanently injure or kill someone?


Not really, CFM, no drugs, legals or prescribed, no other impairment...lack of sleep, illness, no alcohol, no texting, it all falls under personal responsibility.

Until the court system starts treating actions by those doing such things the same way they treat someone harming or killing another person in other manners, the talk of personal responsibility is nothing more than words.

 

[Bigdog]

Oh, another one that thinks a law is stupid based on personal preference rather than a valid argument.

I posted the States' preferences, fool.

I don't want to waste taxpayer money arresting and imprisoning pot smokers. With prison costs at 50k per year, it's not economical to lock them up.

 

[CFM]

I posted the States' preferences, fool.

I don't want to waste taxpayer money arresting and imprisoning pot smokers. With prison costs at 50k per year, it's not economical to lock them up.

If costs if your concern, it could be done a lot cheaper.

Maybe one of them will get smoked up, get behind the wheel of a car, and hit you. Better yet, someone you love so you have to see it.

 

[Bigdog]

If costs if your concern, it could be done a lot cheaper.

Maybe one of them will get smoked up, get behind the wheel of a car, and hit you. Better yet, someone you love so you have to see it.

In other words, you want to see the return of alcohol Prohibition.

One can conclude nothing less from your statement.

 

[Teflon Don]

"Funny they never tried Marinol dontcha think?
All this talk about medical marijuana and there is an FDA approved option nobody ever references.
Why do you think that is?" TD #797

a) No.
This is a Drug War topic. So Marinol is irrelevant to the topic of Trump Administration moves to end legal marijuana because Marinol is a legal patented pharmaceutical, and marijuana is a natural unpatentable herb.

b) Millions in our nation and around the world prefer natural treatments to artificial drugs.

c) Marijuana is typically inhaled, absorbed to psychotropic levels via the lungs. As a result marijuana is faster acting than Marinol, which in vivid contrast is absorbed through the digestive tract.

d) Because of "c", marijuana can be dosed far more precisely, the patient only taking as much as is needed; whereas Marinol must be consumed in the dose predetermined by the pharmaceutical manufacturer, who in all likelihood never met the patient.

Many thanks for asking TD.

You have helped, no matter how inadvertently, to clarify an important distinction in our federal government's War against the People, under the guise of a War on this useful herb, marijuana / hemp / cannabis.

Your post was steeped in ignorance of drug delivery

What is the inhaled dose of marijuana for pain?

What is the inhaled dose of marijuana for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting?

Look if you want to get high, then get high. Just don’t hide behind the “medicinal” bullshit. I will call you out and embarrass you every single time

 

[Teflon Don]

ah
So YOUR life is meaningful, because it has meaning for you, while their lives are "meaningless" because their lives are not meaningful to you. Got it.

Your ignorance is a blinding beacon of self-righteous contempt and ignorance.

FYI in the context of cosmic heat death, all life is meaningless. Your insinuation that yours is more meaningful than anyone else's is conspicuous self-aggrandizing delusion.

Right back atcha cupcake.
The difference is, they're living their lives without trying to lift themselves up, by putting others down. You know, the way you do.

You sure went out of your way to misinterpret what I said.

I never said that mine is MORE meaningful.

I merely pointed out, accurately I might add that they are hiding/masking some sort of sadness behind drugs.

I have tried them but don’t like the way they make me feel.

Most people do drugs to mask some sort of emotional pain. I find that sad and feel sorry for you.

If you think that is judgmental, well it is.

 

[CFM]

In other words, you want to see the return of alcohol Prohibition.

One can conclude nothing less from your statement.

If that's what you conclude, you're an idiot.

Let me repeat it. Maybe one of them will get smoked up, get behind the wheel of a car, and hit you. Better yet, someone you love so you have to see it. I don't want it to happen but WHEN it does, I do hope it happens to those of you that supported what you support.

 

[Teflon Don]

Why not treat MJ the same as Alcohol and tobacco?

There is no rational reason to NOT treat it the same way.

The argument I always hear is that marijuana is safe, non addictive and NOT the same as alcohol and tobacco.

Why would we treat it the same if people claim it is different?

 

[Bigdog]

If that's what you conclude, you're an idiot.

Let me repeat it.

Hypocrite.

 

[sear]

"Your post was steeped in ignorance of drug delivery" TD #808

That's an unsubstantiated contradiction, a dismissal, not a refutation.

If your assertion were true you'd be able to cite one factual error, and correct it.

We both know you won't.

The remainder of your spew is self-righteous ignorance, premised on falsehoods.

 

[CFM]

Hypocrite.

Nothing hypocritical about thinking those that support certain things feeling the ill effects of what they support.

 

[Bigdog]

The argument I always hear is that marijuana is safe, non addictive and NOT the same as alcohol and tobacco.

Why would we treat it the same if people claim it is different?

If YOU believe their claims ... then what's your issue with legalizing it?

 

[CFM]

If YOU believe their claims ... then what's your issue with legalizing it?

I don't believe their claims. What else would a bunch of potheads say other than that? Are they going to argue against it if they want it legalized?

 

[Bigdog]

Nothing hypocritical about thinking those that support certain things feeling the ill effects of what they support.

Nice way to blame all boozers for every drunk driving traffic death, Hypocrite.

 

[zymurgy]

Funny they never tried Marinol dontcha think?

All this talk about medical marijuana and there is an FDA approved option nobody ever references.

Why do you think that is?

so I just refuted your sophomoric question and this is your counter.

Teflon sounds about right. waste of time sounds about right too.

 

[CFM]

Nice way to blame all boozers for every drunk driving traffic death, Hypocrite.

If the boozer is the one that caused the death, who is supposed to be blamed? Are you saying the innocent person is to blame.

Again, I hope you're one of those that feels the negative effects of what you support. Not you personally but the one you love the most in life.

 

[Bigdog]

Nothing hypocritical about thinking those that support certain things feeling the ill effects of what they support.

I'm sure you use the same rational to make gun ownership illegal