I diubt Rump is guilty of collusion.

It was the funny guy on Fox who said Strzok might as well been Michael Moore the TDS was so bad lol.

And he was the FBI lead man in Hillary’s email investigation; he was behind the rewording in Comey’s non-charge; he pushed the fake Dossier on the FISA court and interviewed Flynn, without Flynn’s lawyers being present.

Unbelievable.
Who were the 'lead guys' in the House investigations of Clinton? Should they have been Democrats?
 
Maybe because he is a partisan hack who along with Strzok wrote an exoneration letter for Hillary before the investigation was even complete and changed the wording from "gross negligence" to "extreme carelessness" so as to avoid the exact wording of the statute.

That is not what he said about why he fired Comey.
 
Anatta, that's a cop out answer.

Russia 100% attempted to meddle w/ our election and influence the outcome. I don't have "specific action" in mind - but I want a President to express in a very public way that it's outrageous & unacceptable. What action should be taken should be something that he decides w/ Congress, but it's a big deal that should not be dismissed or ignored, as Trump has done.
It's not only 'what' he's doing, but 'why'? He owes Putin hundreds of millions of dollars
 
To be clear....trump believes the CIA when it comes to protecting Putin, but not when they claim that Russia attempted to hack/influence our election?

Test question:

When was the last time Russians *didn’t* attempt to influence an election? When was the last time the CIA didn’t meddle in theirs, for that matter?
 
Test question:

When was the last time Russians *didn’t* attempt to influence an election? When was the last time the CIA didn’t meddle in theirs, for that matter?
Fair point. Don't you want a POTUS that will do something to avoid future successes?

The issue here is more about most of trump's team, who have ties to Russia. They cannot be trusted with classified intel, nor with making policy.
 
Test question:

When was the last time Russians *didn’t* attempt to influence an election? When was the last time the CIA didn’t meddle in theirs, for that matter?
so we are supposed to have an investigation - and it's now a Criminal Investigation -not "counter intellegence"
on Russian meddling??

I thought it was about Russian coordination ( collusion)? as possible criminal charges?
 
Congressmen are partisan, by definition.

Lead investigators in the FBI, not so much.
When Congressmen are the investigators, then should they not be partisan?

You are aware that plenty of FBI investigators have donated to Republicans?

Is it your claim that nobody in the FBI should vote?
 
When Congressmen are the investigators, then should they not be partisan?

You are aware that plenty of FBI investigators have donated to Republicans?

Is it your claim that nobody in the FBI should vote?

No it's our claim that your nothing burger has been on the grille long enough, at least flip it
 
Where is the evidence of darth of us government tampering with russias election computers or otherwise? Where is the evidence of Russia doing that to the USA in the past?
 
When Congressmen are the investigators, then should they not be partisan?

You are aware that plenty of FBI investigators have donated to Republicans?

Is it your claim that nobody in the FBI should vote?

Of course they should be able to vote.

And if they want to be politically active, that should eliminate them from political investigations. There’s plenty that the FBI does that is apolitical. That a hyper-partisan agent like Strzok would fly under the radar speaks to the general culture of the FBI.

It’s reprehensible that he would get within ten miles of an investigation involving Trump—or Hillary.
 
Back
Top