I diubt Rump is guilty of collusion.

Where is the evidence of darth of us government tampering with russias election computers or otherwise? Where is the evidence of Russia doing that to the USA in the past?

Let us see the DNC server so we can be sure they meddled this time.

To this day, Assange claims they were leaks and not hacks. Yet, for some odd reason, the FBI has no interest in interviewing him.

Why do you suppose that is?
 
US Meddling in 1996 Russian Elections in Support of Boris Yeltsin
Serious observers, including leading Democrats, agree that even if the recent hacking allegations against Russia turn out to be true, the “dirty tricks” did not affect the outcome of the 2016 election.

By contrast, American meddling and financing of the 1996 presidential election in Russia clearly played a pivotal role in turning Yeltsin from a candidate with single-digit approval at the beginning of the yearinto a winning candidate with an official (but disputed) 54.4% of votes cast in the second-round runoff later that same year.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-me...elections-in-support-of-boris-yeltsin/5568288
 
Let us see the DNC server so we can be sure they meddled this time.

To this day, Assange claims they were leaks and not hacks. Yet, for some odd reason, the FBI has no interest in interviewing him.

Why do you suppose that is?

because they know hes full of it
 
Real investigators would never make such an assumption.

Unless they’re interested in something besides the truth.

its not an asumption fool


they have many many FACTS you have yet to see.


its why that guy Mueller fired hated trump


he saw the evidence that he was a traitor and in the russian pocket


TRUMP DID COLLUDE
 
Where is the evidence of darth of us government tampering with russias election computers or otherwise? Where is the evidence of Russia doing that to the USA in the past?

You must have missed the story about Teddy Kennedy colluding with the Russians to defeat Ronald Reagan

Did you miss that?
 
It is sad when GayRod abandons his own threads

1) I haven't seen where they wrote that, but I don't generally read their posts.
2) Nobody from the national stage has claimed that.
3) Just because Rump criminally colluded with the Russians does not mean it made the difference. That would be a very hard case to prove.
4) Vote wise this was the largest win by a popular vote loser EVER. Rump got less votes than Romney, and Hillary got more votes than Obama in 12'.
 
Where is the evidence of darth of us government tampering with russias election computers or otherwise? Where is the evidence of Russia doing that to the USA in the past?
We didn't do it electronically. I believe we inspired the public to rise up. Of course, Putin always gets 99% of the vote.
 
Of course they should be able to vote.

And if they want to be politically active, that should eliminate them from political investigations. There’s plenty that the FBI does that is apolitical. That a hyper-partisan agent like Strzok would fly under the radar speaks to the general culture of the FBI.

It’s reprehensible that he would get within ten miles of an investigation involving Trump—or Hillary.
And still, Mueller is a staunch Republican. You think he's going to taint his investigation?
 
Back
Top