Whataboutism In Chief

and I asked you what's your point, to be proven literal means all is ok?

What are you asserting, that Hillary didn't lie to the FBI

here,
didnt....lie.....to.....the......F....B......I.....??

Um, I'll go slowly again: because it means Trump lied again, because he said definitively that she lied many times, TO THE FBI.

Read some books.
 
Um, I'll go slowly again: because it means Trump lied again, because he said definitively that she lied many times, TO THE FBI.

Read some books.

ok, so you won't answer my question on your "point".
so I'll tell you what your point is, you hate Trump, and are so triggered that you keep regurgitating nonsense.
Hillary lied numerous times, too many to count to everybody that would listen, including you, on very significant subject matters.

She is a pathalogical liar matter of fact. , whereas Flynn spoke to the context of the question, and technically lied.
And that's Trumps point.

You can either join us here in reality, or choose not too
 
You can tell the little bitch that at no time did Mrs. Clinton ever believe that any email she sent contained classified information. Therefore it could not have been a lie.

You can also tell the little bitch that she is on ignore and I have no idea what she is posting, nor do I care. There are enough of her other ID's to make me sick.
 
She said that she didn't send classified material through her private server, that was a lie.

She said that she only used one device, that was a lie.

She said that she turned over all work related emails, that was a lie.

The only one failing is you.

lol

As usual, you are slow on the uptake. Tell us, dumbfuck, what she said to the FBI.
 
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.
The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."
 
Oddly enough there isn’t a transcript of Hillary’s one interview with the FBI, so yeah we don’t know if she lied to the FBI

We know that she lied about her server.

The FBI didn’t perform a normal interview with her like they did with Flynn. The fix was in.

The FBI was never going to find her guilty no matter what crimes she committed.

We know that they scrubbed the words “gross negligence” from Comeys presentation


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
So a couple of emails of 30,000 had markings indicating they were classified burried deep deep in a chain. None were mishandled in the sense of passed to Russian spies.
She commingled work product and private.

No doubt she was very careless to allow it to happen. Bad on her.

De minimus non curat lex.
 
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.
The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."
Nova, if you didn’t write this yourself, please be sure to reference your source, thank you.
 
Nova, if you didn’t write this yourself, please be sure to reference your source, thank you.
I thought the link in the first post included this....thanks for the heads up....

www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html
 
it's not just the markings that make it classified.
The nature of the information makes it inherently classified -or not. Markings or not.

Clinton took a training class in this - she can classify 'at will.' being Sec of State
She also signed off on not putting classified info at risk ( a private server is inherently "at risk")

So she was either lying that she didn't see the "c'-s while ignoring the contents.
Or she was incompetent not to look for and redact out any such info.

reacting in the sense of deletions, not hammering hard drives
 
it's not just the markings that make it classified.
The nature of the information makes it inherently classified -or not. Markings or not.

Clinton took a training class in this - she can classify 'at will.' being Sec of State
She also signed off on not putting classified info at risk ( a private server is inherently "at risk")

So she was either lying that she didn't see the "c'-s while ignoring the contents.
Or she was incompetent not to look for and redact out any such info.

reacting in the sense of deletions, not hammering hard drives
If the Sec. of State can't recognize sensitive and classified information by its substance, she shouldn't have had the job to begin with....
 
If the Sec. of State can't recognize sensitive and classified information by its substance, she shouldn't have had the job to begin with....
yes. she took specific training, and signed off that she understood.
The best you can say about her is she was incompetent
 
yes. she took specific training, and signed off that she understood.
The best you can say about her is she was incompetent

She was probably reading the instructions on her big-girl training pull-ups and signed off because she is incontinent.
 
If the Sec. of State can't recognize sensitive and classified information by its substance, she shouldn't have had the job to begin with....

It's always black and white with cons.

"While “classified information” seems like it should be straightforward and binary—it either is or it isn’t—in practice government classification is a tricky and complicated issue. For one thing, different departments can treat the same information differently, as Under Secretary for Management Patrick F. Kennedy—a career Foreign Service officer who had started in the top position two years before Hillary Clinton came to the department—explained to the FBI.

Whereas the intelligence community often “steals” information, leading it to be classified, the State Department may end up gathering that same information from nonsensitive sources and so never consider it classified; conversations with foreign diplomats may be classified or not—or later upgraded to classified if it’s determined that “the disclosure of such information might damage national security or diplomatic relationships.” (This was particularly true as governments and leaders shifted around the world.) Plus, the lines around documents and information could shift—many internal or even interagency drafts would be considered unclassified while they were being written, but would then be routinely classified when they were transmitted formally to the National Security Council.

Then, of course, there was the problem of the State Department’s unique mission to engage other countries. As one employee related to the FBI: “Generally the only way to discuss topics with Foreign Partners is via unclassified channels, or in very sensitive cases, by making arrangements to meet in person at Embassies or at DoS. Since there isn’t a classified system that allows DoS to communicate with its foreign counterparts, conversations that are held with foreign partners in unclassified channels are later ‘up-classified’ to Secret to protect the information.”

https://www.politico.com/magazine/s...mails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
There are 2 levels of State Dept Email. "High side" and "Low side"

any classified info has to go thru a high side server. a State.gov account.

Hillary had no State.gov account. She/her minions transacted ONLY thru her unsecured private server.
We know her server was without a firewall for a time also.
 
Back
Top