Whataboutism In Chief


Under FBI policy — and to the dismay of civil libertarians and staunch transparency advocates — the bureau does not conduct electronic recordings of interviews.
“Under the current policy, agents may not electronically record confessions or interviews, openly or surreptitiously” except in rare circumstances, the bureau said in a 2006 memo.
The FBI did, however, complete a federal form summarizing the interview, known as an FD-302, Comey said.
Mica recommended that a copy of that summary be provided to the Oversight Committee. *
Comey himself was not among the “five or six” agents who interviewed Clinton, he testified on Thursday. But he assured lawmakers that Clinton told the truth throughout the session.
"I don’t think the agents assessed she was evasive," he added.*






from your link idiot
 
did Hillary testify to the FBI?
where is the transcript? oh that's right the testimony wasn't preserved.
pretty odd for a central figure to testify and no notes were taken

who was at the testimony? not Comey..so how does he know?

Holy, shit - if Comey didn't know....HOW DOES TRUMP KNOW?
 
Written notes could have been taken and Comey was briefed by the agent(s)
yes. but this was a "Special Status " case. Clinton wasn't going to lie -she just had convenient bout's of amnesia.
39 times in an hour?

Moreover the notes weer taken by Strzok’s -lead investigator, who was corrupt, and got fired for it
 
Why did Trump say she lied "many times" to the FBI?

I should have known the apologist brothers would turn this thread into gold.
Clinton probably did not lie..she's too cagey. She had her minions there ( Abedin etc) who were given immunity
( why?)
and instead of taking the 5th -which would have looked bad- she conveniently could not recall..

she's too slik to lie to the FBI ( she saves that for the electorate) but she wasn't going to give up anything either
 
Clinton probably did not lie..she's too cagey. She had her minions there ( Abedin etc) who were given immunity
( why?)
and instead of taking the 5th -which would have looked bad- she conveniently could not recall..

she's too slik to lie to the FBI ( she saves that for the electorate) but she wasn't going to give up anything either

I wonder if you can say it.

So...Trump lied when he claimed that she lied to the FBI "many times"?
 
Hillary's entire downfall was based on her lies, her deception, and the fact that she expected honest free thinking Americans to believe her barrage of bull$hit, non-stop bull$hit.
It is precisely why she is sitting at home on her couch reading a book, watching the Price Is Right re-runs while Trump is governing.

For anyone to start a thread or even respond in one defending her "honesty", implying otherwise, based on semantics is so telling to the depths of which your poor souls have sunken.
Have a little self dignity man, all of you. Most I presume, except maybe evince are smarter than that. I just don't understand your motive in acting so asinine.
 
I wonder if you can say it.

So...Trump lied when he claimed that she lied to the FBI "many times"?
yes thingy. Trump lied/misspoke. there's your pyrrhic victory of the day.

Nevermind the FBI interview was done by a corrupt fired investigator, where Hillary skated away with nothingburger responses.

we do want you to have your "gotcha"moment
 
Hillary's entire downfall was based on her lies, her deception, and the fact that she expected honest free thinking Americans to believe her barrage of bull$hit, non-stop bull$hit.
It is precisely why she is sitting at home on her couch reading a book, watching the Price Is Right re-runs while Trump is governing.

For anyone to start a thread or even respond in one defending her "honesty", implying otherwise, based on semantics is so telling to the depths of which you poor souls have sunken.
Have a little self dignity man, all of you. Most I presume, except maybe evince are smarter than that. I just don't understand your motive in acting so asinine.

Where did I imply "otherwise"?

I have said many times on here that Hillary lies, often. Once again, you can't read - which makes sense, because you don't seem intelligent at all. THIS thread is about lying TO THE FBI.

Maybe if you keep responding w/ clueless comments, you'll eventually get it.
 
yes thingy. Trump lied/misspoke. there's your pyrrhic victory of the day.

Nevermind the FBI interview was done by a corrupt fired investigator, where Hillary skated away with nothingburger responses.

we do want you to have your "gotcha"moment

Bzzzzzzzt!!!!!

You couldn't do it. He didn't lie/misspeak. He lied.
 
Hillary's entire downfall was based on her lies, her deception, and the fact that she expected honest free thinking Americans to believe her barrage of bull$hit, non-stop bull$hit.
It is precisely why she is sitting at home on her couch reading a book, watching the Price Is Right re-runs while Trump is governing.

For anyone to start a thread or even respond in one defending her "honesty", implying otherwise, based on semantics is so telling to the depths of which your poor souls have sunken.
Have a little self dignity man, all of you. Most I presume, except maybe evince are smarter than that. I just don't understand your motive in acting so asinine.
they can't defend her actions,or her candidacy - so they have to go after Trumps ( as usual) crummy language.

The same way the FBI started a "counterintelligence" investigation off a bullshit "Steele document"

It's not about intellectual honesty,or justice,or even "da Russians" it's about getting Trump's scalp
 
Where did I imply "otherwise"?

I have said many times on here that Hillary lies, often. Once again, you can't read - which makes sense, because you don't seem intelligent at all. THIS thread is about lying TO THE FBI.

Maybe if you keep responding w/ clueless comments, you'll eventually get it.

and what is the point of that, it's like saying, "yea, but OJ was never "convicted" of murder. It's just a stupid display of semantics. Implying that she is honest, or more honest than someone who "actually" lied to the FBI.
And like I said, proceed with your "She never lied to the FBI" thread. I'll move on.
You look alike an a$$, you look like evince, it's not a good look.
 
they can't defend her actions,or her candidacy - so they have to go after Trumps ( as usual) crummy language.

The same way the FBI started a "counterintelligence" investigation off a bullshit "Steele document"

It's not about intellectual honesty,or justice,or even "da Russians" it's about getting Trump's scalp

"Crummy language"..."sloppy with the facts."

He lied, anatta. He's a liar.
 
and what is the point of that, it's like saying, "yea, but OJ was never "convicted" of murder. It's just a stupid display of semantics. Implying that she is honest, or more honest than someone who "actually" lied to the FBI.
And like I said, proceed with your "She never lied to the FBI" thread. I'll move on.
You look alike an a$$, you look like evince, it's not a good look.

It's nothing like the bolded. Lying to the FBI is a felony - so, there is a distinction there.

Man, are you stupid.
 
Comey Confirms Hillary Clinton Lied To The Public About Her Emails [VIDEO]

During a back-and-forth between Rep. Trey Gowdy and James Comey on Thursday, the FBI director confirmed that Hillary Clinton lied multiple times about her email and server use.

During a hearing in front of the House Oversight Committee Gowdy questioned Comey saying, “Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private email. Was that true?”
(VIDEO: Congress To Ask FBI To Investigate Hillary For Lying Under Oath)

“Our investigation found that there was classified information” discovered,” Comey replied.

Gowdy followed up, “Secretary Clinton said there was not anything marked classified on her emails, either sent or received. Was that true?”

That’s not true,” Comey replied. “There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents.”

Secretary Clinton said, I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material,” Gowdy said. “Was that was true?”

There was classified material emailed,” Comey responded.

“Secretary Clinton said she used just one device,” Gowdy said. “Was that true?

According to Comey, Clinton “used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state.”

“Secretary Clinton said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department,” Gowdy said. “Was that true?”

No. We found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned,” Comey said.

“Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account,” Gowdy said. “Was that true?”

“That’s a harder one to answer,” Comey answered. “We found traces of work-related emails on devices or in slack space. Whether they were deleted or a server was changed out something happened to them. There’s no doubt that the work-related emails that were removed electronically from the email system."

“Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive,” Gowdy said. “Did her lawyers read the email content individually?”

No,” Comey replied.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/07/c...on-lied-to-the-public-about-her-emails-video/
 
And I don't think you know what a "pyrrhic" victory is, anatta. Can you describe how this was one for me?
we know you desperately want to hang it on Trump -so there you go.
Enjoy it - revel in it with abandon- it's what the left lives for.

Meanwhile back in the real world we'll take care of cleaning up the foreign policy mess Obama left behind,
and grow the GDP. You and DC can enjoy the daily drama waiting for Mueller to score
 
Back
Top