Why do Republicans continue to lie about Trickle Down neo-liberal economics?

JFK was a Keynesian and the GOP has never believed in Supply Side theory cause as W’s pappy said “it’s voodoo economics.”. The GOP uses Supply Side arguments for tax cuts for the wealthy.

I can find you many articles on supply side economics but this is one that hits at the core of what it is. You can't redefine it in your own definition to them try and claim it a failure


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fo...ance-abounds-about-supply-side-economics/amp/
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_are_all_Keynesians_now




"We are all Keynesians now" is a famous phrase coined by Milton Friedman and attributed to U.S. president Richard Nixon. It is popularly associated with the reluctant embrace in a time of financial crisis of Keynesian economics by individuals such as Nixon who had formerly favored less interventionist policies.



History of the phrase and variations[edit]
Carl Turner in his 1969 book[1] cites a Russian article by I.G. Blyumin from 1947, referring to what was already the 'famous remark'. The phrase was later attributed to Milton Friedman in the December 31, 1965, edition of Time magazine.[2] In the February 4, 1966, edition, Friedman wrote a letter clarifying that his original statement had been "In one sense, we are all Keynesians now; in another, nobody is any longer a Keynesian."[3]


Friedman's expression was purportedly a rejoinder to the 1888 claim of British politician William Vernon Harcourt that "We are all socialists now";[4] a declaration that was reprinted for a Newsweek magazine cover story in 2009.[5]
In 1971, after taking the United States off the gold standard,[6] Nixon was quoted as saying "I am now a Keynesian in economics",[7] which became popularly associated with Friedman's phrase.


In 2002, Peter Mandelson wrote an article in The Times declaring "we are all Thatcherites now", referring to the acceptance among the other political parties of Margaret Thatcher's economic policies.[8]


The phrase gained new life in the midst of the global financial crisis of 2008, when economists called for massive investment in infrastructure and job creation as a means of economic stimulation.[
 
the right wing babble gets us to cut taxes

what they claim it will produce never happens


then Keynesian government spending solutions are tried


they fix the mess


how many times can we prove your shit is shit?
 
the right wing babble gets us to cut taxes

what they claim it will produce never happens


then Keynesian government spending solutions are tried


they fix the mess


how many times can we prove your shit is shit?

How long have we tried handing a lazy piece of shit someone else's money through social welfare programs with the mindset that it is a hand up not a handout? Heavily, for 50 years with $22 trillion wasted only to have the same percentage of people in poverty as we did before wasting those trillions. How many of those that took part in the first generation of the handouts have descendants still living on them as a way of life? Too many.
 
How long have we tried handing a lazy piece of shit someone else's money through social welfare programs with the mindset that it is a hand up not a handout? Heavily, for 50 years with $22 trillion wasted only to have the same percentage of people in poverty as we did before wasting those trillions. How many of those that took part in the first generation of the handouts have descendants still living on them as a way of life? Too many.

because its merely helping the individual people out of the mess and not actaully fixing the underlining problems dick spittle.



It take education


healthcare

proper nutrition


affordable housing


and LOVE

to change things


your go to move is HATE

and starve the poor


go read a modest proposal


dont you know your hsitory
 
because its merely helping the individual people out of the mess and not actaully fixing the underlining problems dick spittle.



It take education


healthcare

proper nutrition


affordable housing


and LOVE

to change things


your go to move is HATE

and starve the poor


go read a modest proposal


dont you know your hsitory

It's not my place nor my responsibility to fix messes people put themselves in.

How many of those that you say need help through education gave up their chance at getting one when they quit high school?

As far as those other things, feel free to help all of those of your own choosing. I won't tell you who YOU can personally help with YOUR money as long as you don't demand I help those of YOUR choosing with mine.
 
I’ve never tried to redefine it. I’ve mearly observed that none of its predictions hold water. Which is about the most damning thing you can say about any theory.

Why do so many lefties continue to support a theory that social welfare will, as LBJ stated, "Our aim is not only to relieve the symptom of poverty, but to cure it and, above all, to prevent it". $22 trillion later and we still have a roughly the same percentage in poverty as we did prior to wasting that $22 trillion. Wouldn't you say that's pretty damning on that theory?

Why are taxpayers still required to fund a theory that has proven to be a failure?
 
Last edited:
link to your claims for one


and then realize your shits try to dismantle it all the time.


you refuse to let it work by pulling it back whenever your in power

its called evil
 
I’ve never tried to redefine it. I’ve mearly observed that none of its predictions hold water. Which is about the most damning thing you can say about any theory.

We can look at GDP growth under Reagan and compare it to Obama's Keynesian policies and see how that turned out.
 
We can look at GDP growth under Reagan and compare it to Obama's Keynesian policies and see how that turned out.
Or we can look at Obama's growth and compare it to W...a true supply sider and see how it almost took down the entire US economic system. We can also observe that Obama's Keynesian approach was hog tied by GOP congressionals from the start and was not enough to generate the growth needed to recover from the Bush recession.
 
Or we can look at Obama's growth and compare it to W...a true supply sider and see how it almost took down the entire US economic system. We can also observe that Obama's Keynesian approach was hog tied by GOP congressionals from the start and was not enough to generate the growth needed to recover from the Bush recession.

There are no "true" supply siders in office but Reagan was much closer to being one than Bush. And Reagan had to deal with a Democratic House all eight years so leave Congress out of it.

Both came into office with huge recessions and the bigger the recession you have the chance for a bigger recovery. Reagan delivered and Obama didn't.
 
There are no "true" supply siders in office but Reagan was much closer to being one than Bush. And Reagan had to deal with a Democratic House all eight years so leave Congress out of it.

Both came into office with huge recessions and the bigger the recession you have the chance for a bigger recovery. Reagan delivered and Obama didn't.
Reagan was never a true supply sider either. As soon as those policies bit him with huge deficits and a recession he raised taxes so fast it would make your head spin then he and Pappy Bush spend the next 6 years raising taxes to pay for their huge increases in military spending.

No one has ever really tried Supply Side economics other than as a front (read excuse) to cut taxes regressively as they know...as does most anyone else, that there are three things in life that don't work, Late Model Chryslers, Michiganders and Supply Side Economics!
 
Reagan was never a true supply sider either. As soon as those policies bit him with huge deficits and a recession he raised taxes so fast it would make your head spin then he and Pappy Bush spend the next 6 years raising taxes to pay for their huge increases in military spending.

No one has ever really tried Supply Side economics other than as a front (read excuse) to cut taxes regressively as they know...as does most anyone else, that there are three things in life that don't work, Late Model Chryslers, Michiganders and Supply Side Economics!

So what is your explanation for why Reagan had the growth he did and Obama didn't?
 
Uh, no.

Just because we are generating so much wealth that real estate prices are high, and we attract wealthy people, doesn't mean we shouldn't be trying to have more affordable housing.
Businesses are hightailing it out of Communistfornia at breakneck speed. I hope that a major conniption fit occurs at the San Andreas.
 
So what is your explanation for why Reagan had the growth he did and Obama didn't?

Well the Great Recession certainly hurt Economic growth during Obama’s years but then again ask yourself why economic growth under Reagan was lower than JFK, LBJ and Clinton?

In fact post WWII Reagan has been the only Republican President to see economic growth above the post WWII average of 2.9% at 3.5%. Why is that?
 
Well the Great Recession certainly hurt Economic growth during Obama’s years but then again ask yourself why economic growth under Reagan was lower than JFK, LBJ and Clinton?

In fact post WWII Reagan has been the only Republican President to see economic growth above the post WWII average of 2.9% at 3.5%. Why is that?

Republicans TALK growth but Democrats HAVE growth.

Putting money in the pockets of the rich - the Republican obsession - is not what creates growth. Plutocracy hurts growth. JFK supported a RESPONSIBLE tax cut to a top rate around 72%. It's Reagan that took it much too low.
 
Back
Top