Why do Republicans continue to lie about Trickle Down neo-liberal economics?

No. CA has a lot more good than bad, and the good is the national goal - not our right-wing areas or the poverty that exists. We're the wealthiest state in the nation, leading in key industries from tech to entertainment to being the top agricultural state and a top dairy state. It's why our economy is bigger per capita than other states', dwarfing red states to whom we subsidize with our tax dollars for their poor, while our state has people with healthcare unlike red states. Overall we're doing great.

So we should pass on our refusal to build housing nationally which is the main driver of our inequality and the reason we have a 20% poverty rate? I mean if the medium home price in your area isn't $750K you're not doing it right, correct?
 
I'm referring to paying the higher tax rates from before Reagan. If she means to pay all the difference now at once - no, I don't think that's close to practical or a good idea.

That is what she's saying. The wealthy should pay all their back taxes since the '80's (individuals and corporations).

I mean this is a message board so one can say anything but that is what she believes
 
So we should pass on our refusal to build housing nationally which is the main driver of our inequality and the reason we have a 20% poverty rate? I mean if the medium home price in your area isn't $750K you're not doing it right, correct?

Uh, no.

Just because we are generating so much wealth that real estate prices are high, and we attract wealthy people, doesn't mean we shouldn't be trying to have more affordable housing.
 
That is what she's saying. The wealthy should pay all their back taxes since the '80's (individuals and corporations).

I mean this is a message board so one can say anything but that is what she believes

I'm for re-re-distributing wealth to more equality, but more gradually.

Unfortunately, we're going the opposite directions with Republicans trying to massively increase inequality. Huge problem and nothing more important for the people to battle.
 
Money is power.

When all the money is at the top of the food chain, we get Donald dump for president.

When people stop believing that tax cuts put money in their pockets we can then begin real reform.

By real reform, I mean the wealthy paying all the back taxes they owe since Reagan.

They, racist white wing republican men have been stealing from this country and blaming Blacks for it for so long, its a wonder if white American will ever see it or believe it.

Seems incompetent blacks have been making excuses and blaming their failures on whites for far longer. Will they ever do something to help themselves instead of blaming that incompetence on someone else?
 
I'm for re-re-distributing wealth to more equality, but more gradually.

Unfortunately, we're going the opposite directions with Republicans trying to massively increase inequality. Huge problem and nothing more important for the people to battle.

In other words you support giving those that didn't earn it something for nothing. Got it.

We've tried that shit to the tune of $22 trillion over the last 50 years and all we have is their descendants demanding more from the descendants of those doing for themselves. The productive members of society aren't the ATM for the leeches in society. Start doing for yourself or do without.
 
Uh, no.

Just because we are generating so much wealth that real estate prices are high, and we attract wealthy people, doesn't mean we shouldn't be trying to have more affordable housing.


When are those demanding someone else constantly do something for them going to start doing for themselves. $22 trillion wasted on social welfare over the last 50 years with no result.
 
More importantly, why does the Republican base (and yes, even the Democratic base) continue to buy into it? This will be what -- the third time? -- trying massive tax cuts. They don't pay for themselves, and thus balloon the debt. They didn't work under Lord Raygun, they didn't work under Bush, and they're not going to work under Trump. All they do is increase the wealth disparity between the rich and the poor (formerly the middle class).

Any theories on why the people are stupid enough to believe that tax cuts for the super rich will generate wealth for the middle class and below? I laugh at the pittance that the middle class will receive under these tax cuts.

fox news lies


and right wing radio


its why they created it once the main stream news could no longer help them lie about it without having their viewers turn them off.
 
More importantly, why does the Republican base (and yes, even the Democratic base) continue to buy into it? This will be what -- the third time? -- trying massive tax cuts. They don't pay for themselves, and thus balloon the debt. They didn't work under Lord Raygun, they didn't work under Bush, and they're not going to work under Trump. All they do is increase the wealth disparity between the rich and the poor (formerly the middle class).

Any theories on why the people are stupid enough to believe that tax cuts for the super rich will generate wealth for the middle class and below? I laugh at the pittance that the middle class will receive under these tax cuts.

That’s an excellent question as these Supply Side tax cuts have never once produced the results their defenders claim they do.
 
When are those demanding someone else constantly do something for them going to start doing for themselves. $22 trillion wasted on social welfare over the last 50 years with no result.

link to no result asshole.


children not starving cost us less in schooling costs and medical costs you fucking racist sociopath
 
Like I said, I'm happy to pay fair taxes. It's not practical to ask people to come up with 30 years of taxes at once, but we should roll back tax rates to pre-Reagan and perhaps temporarily increase them a bit to get back to more equality.

There's nothing better our country can do than to restore our more balanced tax rates and lower inequality and increase investments in the country following a democratic (small and large d) public-interest agenda like infrastructure and education.

Interesting how those that say things like you want to be the ones to determine what makes it fair.

If some poor leech wants to be equal to someone else, let them do what that someone else did. What you want is the high school dropout to be equal to the productive individual that did something to better him/herself.
 
Seems incompetent blacks have been making excuses and blaming their failures on whites for far longer. Will they ever do something to help themselves instead of blaming that incompetence on someone else?

you mean like Greenwood OK


when the black community thatwas forced to be separated from the whites then KICKED the white Okies asses in commerse sooooo badly that the white racists got pissed and MURDERED children in the beds ?


you racists are more hated than black people asshole


YOU are the minority that everyone hates


black people are LOVED world wide compared to you fucking racists


lick that gutter
 
link to no result asshole.


children not starving cost us less in schooling costs and medical costs you fucking racist sociopath

http://www.heritage.org/poverty-and-inequality/report/the-war-poverty-after-50-years

You'll ignore it which proves I'm correct. Thanks for playing, bitch.

If children are starving, it falls on the parents of those children or bleeding hearts like you that think it's your place to care for someone else's kids. As I've said before, if I didn't get the pussy, the kids that came out of it aren't my responsibility. In other words, I'm not responsible for someone else's kids. If you think you are and those kids aren't getting what they need, it's on you. I suggest you start doing what you say should be done. I take care of mine and they're the only ones to which I hold that responsibility. PERIOD.
 
They worked great under Reagan. Take a look at GDP growth then compared to today.

The issue is politicians choose not to cut spending.

What rock were you hiding under? Reagans Supply Side tax cuts and massive deficit spending on the military undermined what Voelker had been doing to end of years of stagflation due to Nixon’s policies to the point where Reagan back tracked and raised taxes. It was at that period when Reagan raised taxes and reduced deficit spending that the economy in the 80’s began to improve.

You need to go back and study the actual history of the Reagan era instead of relying on internet myth.
 
That’s an excellent question as these Supply Side tax cuts have never once produced the results their defenders claim they do.


What has the social programs you bleeding hearts support except multiple generations of leeches that thinks someone earning their way owes them something. $22 trillion wasted in 50 years and all we have to show for it are the children and grandchildren of leeches continuing to be leeches.
 
the heritage foundation is utter fucking racist right wing crap asshole


I didn't think you would accept facts. Always an excuse.

I also didn't think you would personally accept the responsibility you demand the rest of us be forced to do. Typical NL bleeding heart Liberal. Lot of mouth and no action.
 
you mean like Greenwood OK


when the black community thatwas forced to be separated from the whites then KICKED the white Okies asses in commerse sooooo badly that the white racists got pissed and MURDERED children in the beds ?


you racists are more hated than black people asshole


YOU are the minority that everyone hates


black people are LOVED world wide compared to you fucking racists


lick that gutter

Do you have anything less than 100 years old?
 
facts dont have experation dates

No one claimed it didn't happen. However, if something 100 years old is the only thing you have, just proves what I said.

20 years old? 30 years old? For the last 50 years, most, not all, blacks have been working on increasing the bastard birth rate, crime/incarceration rate, unemployment rate, dropout rate, and use of social welfare rate. I wish more would be like those in Greenwood OK from the early 20th century. In reality, it's wishful thinking.
 
Back
Top