It looks like Trump Junior Is a target.

Soliciting a foreign national to provide anything of value to a campaign is illegal.

Soliciting anyone to provide stolen items (including emails) is illegal.

but to quote a famous liberal looney tune, if the facts are true what difference does it make how they were obtained

and it's hard to "steal" emails that were supposed to be public property anyway,
What alternate universe are you being allowed to live in
 
Soliciting a foreign national to provide anything of value to a campaign is illegal.

Soliciting anyone to provide stolen items (including emails) is illegal.

So by your definition Fusion GPS should be under indictment along with the DNC and Hillary Campaign correct?

If not correct please explain the difference other than one is a democrat which you excuse any and all manner of behavior and the other is Trump who had the audacity to win in November.
 
So by your definition Fusion GPS should be under indictment along with the DNC and Hillary Campaign correct?

If not correct please explain the difference other than one is a democrat which you excuse any and all manner of behavior and the other is Trump who had the audacity to win in November.

Garud is simply an ambulance chaser. He has no understanding of the law outside perhaps of how to take 40% from his clients.
 
Apparently GayRod has not heard of Steele and Fusion GPS


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

He is like Desh, he posts a link or a portion of the law and cannot use his own words to describe how he thinks it applies. He has no understanding of the law at this level.
 
but to quote a famous liberal looney tune, if the facts are true what difference does it make how they were obtained

and it's hard to "steal" emails that were supposed to be public property anyway,
What alternate universe are you being allowed to live in

The DNC emails that were stolen we’re not supposed to be public property. You’re confusing emails here. Intentionally or not I don’t know... Are you stupid or just trying to confuse the discussion?
 
You can legally hire a foreign national to do research, you cannot legally pay a foreign national for something they already have. I don’t expect you to be able to appreciate the difference. Trust me the federal courts can appreciate the difference.
 
You can legally hire a foreign national to do research, you cannot legally pay for national for something they already have. I don’t expect you to be able to appreciate the difference. Trust me the federal courts can appreciate the difference.

LMAO... no Garud, you are not trusted. You are too fucking stupid to be trusted. Again... point to the law that was violated. Tell us how you think the Trump campaign violated it.

Then by all means, enlighten us to the difference in your above line of stupidity.
 
Show me evidence that the Clinton campaign knowingly paid it for national for dirt on Trump.

You goof balls have had A YEAR to get evidence of Trump/Russian collusion---and we are still waiting for it. Yet, you have the audacity to call out for evidence of Hillary paying Russians via a middle man two weeks after the story broke?

Have you no shame?
 

Thank you for the citations and links, it does appear to me that it is very likely the Clinton campaign broke the law. I will say however that there is a fine line between hiring someone to do research that is not already in their possession and paying someone for information they already have.

If the Clinton campaign broke the law I want them prosecuted just as much as the Trump campaign.
 
You goof balls have had A YEAR to get evidence of Trump/Russian collusion---and we are still waiting for it. Yet, you have the audacity to call out for evidence of Hillary paying Russians via a middle man two weeks after the story broke?

Have you no shame?
I’m waiting
 
Back
Top