After Trump dossier revelation, FBI is next

Trump's campaign did the same thing w/ WikiLeaks.

I find it corrupt, but he'd just call it opp research. I don't know why this is a big deal for you guys.

Do you think it is a big deal that Obama and Clinton gave 20% of our Uranium to Putin?
 
kbTzYqx7Px-10.png


CNN’s reporting on the dossier, led by correspondent Evan Perez, has been favorable to the firm Fusion GPS, and hyped the dossier’s credibility.

Left out of Perez’s reporting, which has relied largely on unnamed sources, is his personal closeness to Fusion GPS’ operatives. Fusion has repeatedly been described in Senate testimonies as a smear-for-hire operation that manufactures misleading or false media narratives for its clients.

Glenn Simpson, the Fusion co-founder most often associated with the dossier, is used to working on stories with Perez. As reporters at the Journal, Perez and Simpson regularly co-authored stories on national security.

At no point in Perez’s reporting did he disclose his close ties to the Fusion GPS operatives.

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board sounded the alarm about its former reporters in a remarkable editorial earlier this month, accusing Beltway media of being complicit in a coverup with Fusion. “Americans don’t need a Justice Department coverup abetted by Glenn Simpson’s media buddies,” the editors wrote in a scathing takedown of the firm.

CNN’s coverage of the dossier has been relatively soft. CNN anchor Jake Tapper, usually known for his aggressive coverage, gave Fusion a pass while reporting on the story Wednesday evening.

During a segment on his show, he asserted that “some of the details [of the dossier] have been proven accurate.” But the newsman failed to mention reporting he did back in January that called the dossier’s credibility into question.

On Jan. 10, the day that BuzzFeed published the dossier, Tapper cited a government source who told him that a key claim in the dossier about Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen, was false.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/10/28/cnn-ties-to-fusion-gps-n2401772
 
What does "fake news" have to do w/ it?

Is that just a mantra for you now?

Trump's campaign did the same thing as Clinton's. Both pretty corrupt. You only care about one.
I'll be your Huckleberry..what did they both do?
 
I'll be your Huckleberry..what did they both do?

As far as anyone knows, Trump ran a clean campaign. Hillary, not so much, apparently.

They've pretty much given up on Trump-Russia collision and have gone on to Trump laundering money for Putin or whatever lol. Maybe we'll learn something tomorrow if Mueller actually indicts someone. I wouldn't take it as a given since the claim came from an anonymous source from Leaky Mueller's investigation. And the anonymous sources don't exactly have a great track record for being accurate.

We'll see.

I still think the timing of the leak was telling. The Deep State was taking a beating---even in the leftist branch of the media all last week. There were even calls for Mueller to step aside. If Mueller had any integrity he would. And then we get the Friday News Dump about an inpending indictment.

Sounds to me like someone was wanting change the topic of discussion lol. If that's the case, and there really is an indictment tomorrow---and it was done prematurely in order for Mueller to keep his job, don't be surprised if it's a weak charge and/or something that won't stick.

An indictment is just a charge, after all. Whoever it is, will still get a trial.
 
What does "fake news" have to do w/ it?

Is that just a mantra for you now?

Trump's campaign did the same thing as Clinton's. Both pretty corrupt. You only care about one.

No they did not, they did not actively collude with the Russians as the Clintons did.
 
you lie bag idiot cons are not going to get traction with these fucking idiots memes


Op research is not illegal

there is no deep state anntta just likes to DEEP THROAT Putins cock


the Urainium deal happend how many years ago assholes?

nothing to do with clinton

why hasnt trumpy gone after clinton if its real

on monday when we see just who is indicted your shit will go crazy huh.


will trumpy try to pardon this persn BEFORE the FBI gets them to turn on him
 
As far as anyone knows, Trump ran a clean campaign. Hillary, not so much, apparently.

They've pretty much given up on Trump-Russia collision and have gone on to Trump laundering money for Putin or whatever lol. Maybe we'll learn something tomorrow if Mueller actually indicts someone. I wouldn't take it as a given since the claim came from an anonymous source from Leaky Mueller's investigation. And the anonymous sources don't exactly have a great track record for being accurate.

We'll see.

I still think the timing of the leak was telling. The Deep State was taking a beating---even in the leftist branch of the media all last week. There were even calls for Mueller to step aside. If Mueller had any integrity he would. And then we get the Friday News Dump about an inpending indictment.

Sounds to me like someone was wanting change the topic of discussion lol. If that's the case, and there really is an indictment tomorrow---and it was done prematurely in order for Mueller to keep his job, don't be surprised if it's a weak charge and/or something that won't stick.

An indictment is just a charge, after all. Whoever it is, will still get a trial.
I think they had Flynn all bound up and ready to go, Meuller just pushed the button to change the newscycle,
$$ to donuts that's what's on the Sunday shows today..very little (if any) about Deep State abuses of power
 
I knew it..Meet the Press lead in "Meuller indictment" ( bare in mind this is still rumor) and NOTHING
on Uranium One or Steele dossier
 
the FBI investigation is not based on the dossier idiot


the Urainum diversion is utter crap


no facts there assminer.


your lies dont work like they used to cossack
 
I think they had Flynn all bound up and ready to go, Meuller just pushed the button to change the newscycle,
$$ to donuts that's what's on the Sunday shows today..very little (if any) about Deep State abuses of power

Remind me to never make a bet with you lol.
 
Page was already known to the FBI;

"Ever since F.B.I. investigators discovered in 2013 that a Russian spy was trying to recruit an American businessman named Carter Page, the bureau maintained an occasional interest in Mr. Page. So when he became a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign last year and gave a Russia-friendly speech at a prestigious Moscow institute, it soon caught the bureau’s attention."

"That trip last July was a catalyst for the F.B.I. investigation into connections between Russia and President Trump’s campaign, according to current and former law enforcement and intelligence officials."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/us/politics/carter-page-russia-trump.html

Want to try again?

poor anatta
still a useful idiot.
 
the Plastun is really out there huh


what if backup never comes for you guys

Putin may just send you tea ( his special blend) instead of backup huh
 
Back
Top