After Trump dossier revelation, FBI is next

Whose uranium?

It doesn't get much more Right Wing than Forbes


Hillary Clinton is back in the news. But the reason is a big nothing burger.
In a 2015 book, Breitbart News editor Peter Schweizer claimed that donations to the Clinton Foundation were behind the Obama administration’s approval of the 2010 sale of a Canadian mining company to a Russian state-controlled firm. The sale gave Russia control of a large swath of American uranium interests.
And by large, we really mea
n small.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesc...scandal-are-a-real-empty-barrel/#208c53307b55
 
Tune in tomorrow for some Republican frogs being marched!

What's reasonable bail for a rich traitor who is a flight risk to the black sea?
 
I thought Russia was the big bad enemy.

You don't care that they scored some Uranium with our help? Do you have any idea how inconsistent you are?
Wait...you don't think they have enough nukes to blow us up one thousand times? This is for energy production.
 
Wait...you don't think they have enough nukes to blow us up one thousand times? This is for energy production.

So they - and you- say.

Prove it, and then explain why the Clinton Foundation just happened to get $145 million from Russians while the deal was under review by the Obama Administration.

I''l understand if you can't.
 
Wait...you don't think they have enough nukes to blow us up one thousand times? This is for energy production.

How much of that uranium has left the United States?

You are aware that eight other agencies other than the State Dept had to sign off on the deal?
 
So they - and you- say.

Prove it, and then explain why the Clinton Foundation just happened to get $145 million from Russians while the deal was under review by the Obama Administration.

I''l understand if you can't.

There it is, "explain why the Clinton Foundation just happened to get $145 million from the Russians," he can't explain it, so emjoi automatically assumes it is a pay to play, well, that's what he heard on the radio, so he's taking it as "proof," and then he wants you to disprove that which hasn't been proven yet

And that is the way it is in rightlandsville
 
There it is, "explain why the Clinton Foundation just happened to get $145 million from the Russians," he can't explain it, so emjoi automatically assumes it is a pay to play, well, that's what he heard on the radio, so he's taking it as "proof," and then he wants you to disprove that which hasn't been proven yet And that is the way it is in rightlandsville

Are you denying that the Clinton Foundation just happened to get $145 million from the Russians while the deal was under review by the Obama Administration, anchovies?
 
Are you denying that the Clinton Foundation just happened to get $145 million from the Russians while the deal was under review by the Obama Administration, anchovies?

Don't know, but assuming they did, let's see you now prove that it was pay for play

We'll understand if you can't
 
Don't know, but assuming they did, let's see you now prove that it was pay for play We'll understand if you can't

If I'd stated that it was "pay for play", you'd have a point, anchovies.

Since I didn't, you don't.



bhsbzj4xe9tz.jpg





JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON - JUST A COINCIDENCE - NOTHING TO SEE HERE, AMERICA - MOVE ON -
 
Don't know, but assuming they did, let's see you now prove that it was pay for play

We'll understand if you can't

Good grief. The Clintons can write a manual on plausible deniability lol.

You have to be a brain dead partisan not to see the quid pro quo. Bill 'just happened' to score a 500k speaking fee from the *Russians* while the uranium deal was going down.

Amazing.
 
Back
Top