50 dead and 200 wounded in Las Vegas shootings

So, since the above exchange took place a few days ago, AFTER I suggested that the way he got ahold of a fully automatic rifle was simply to purchase an inexpensive conversion kit, and AFTER you expressed your doubts as to the correctness of my statement, it has come to light that I was exactly, 100% CORRECT.

Just thought I'd remind you of that. :awesome:

Would you care to show where the police or the FBI have stated that any of his guns were AUTOMATIC or is this just another of your lies??
 
How many idiot gun haters that never knew what a bump stock was then heard some other gun hater use the term now want to ban them. How many of those idiots consider using a bump stock means the guns have been converted to automatic?

Evidently Nomad's little bit of cognitive thought, thinks that's what they do. :palm:
 
My son was staying at that very hotel a few months back. He was attending a Cisco conference there, truly crazy.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
cabde06e0d6a120e21056a3f35f9f653.jpg
Chicago
Final September Totals
Shot & Killed: 58
Shot & Wounded: 273
Total Shot: 331
Total Homicides: 58, where is the outrage,where was hillary clinton when these people where murdered,where is the noise media,i guess you must use a bumpstock to get press,these lives do not matter,no political hay to be made in CHICAGO.

where is t
 
Would you care to show where the police or the FBI have stated that any of his guns were AUTOMATIC or is this just another of your lies??

Wrong, idiot. When I said "inexpensive conversion kit" I meant any kind of inexpensive accessory that made the gun fire LIKE an automatic weapon.

You're just picking at nits.
 
Wrong, idiot. When I said "inexpensive conversion kit" I meant any kind of inexpensive accessory that made the gun fire LIKE an automatic weapon.

You're just picking at nits.

But you also said that "...he got ahold of a fully automatic rifle..." and he didn't have any, in the hotel room.
 
While it's a "conversion", it doesn't "convert" it to a fully automatic firearm; which is where their logic becomes convoluted.

According to Buckly, it "effectively" does. His logic can't become convoluted as he has shown he doesn't practice logical thinking.
 
That's the ONLY difference? Really?

Otherwise, you think they are the same scale, and should have the same coverage?

Really?

Really?

So you can honestly say that if a Trump supporter had shot at democrats it would have only gotten a day of coverage like Hodgekinson did?

Where were the lefties calls for gun control after that? There were none. Why? They wanted the Bernie supporter off the news cycle.

Nigga please
 
M60 machine gun: 500-650 rpm
M240 machine gun: 650-950 rpm
Bump stock: 400-800 rpm

How's that for "essentially", you fucking shitstain?

You don’t know what you are talking about. Paddock didn’t come anywhere close to 400-800 RPM.

Listen to the gunfire. Rapid bursts with long pauses indicating he was swapping out a magazine.

You are stupid if you think anyone can approach 400-800 rounds a minute with a bump stock.
 
You don’t know what you are talking about. Paddock didn’t come anywhere close to 400-800 RPM.

Listen to the gunfire. Rapid bursts with long pauses indicating he was swapping out a magazine.

You are stupid if you think anyone can approach 400-800 rounds a minute with a bump stock.

You calculated an estimate of the gunfire, shitstain? Yeah, sure you did, shitstain. But I didn't mention Paddock, did I shitstain? I cited the numbers for bump stocks, shitstain. The same numbers come up regardless of the reference.
 
Last edited:
M60 machine gun: 500-650 rpm
M240 machine gun: 650-950 rpm
Bump stock: 400-800 rpm

How's that for "essentially", you fucking shitstain?

One would think you'd come to a location you've indicated you knew and "essentially" try to take my guns. That you haven't shown absolutely makes you a coward.
 
Back
Top