killed 50 from two blocks away from the 32nd floor....

Jarod said:
I have not made an argument yet.

I agree that my position will lose, its still my position and its still right.
Click to expand...

According to you on other issues if the MAJORITY disagrees with you then that means you are wrong.

Therefore you are wrong.

PS

You cannot buy an automatic weapon without a special license from the federal gobblement. For all intents and purposes they are banned for most people.

If this guy truly used a fully automatic weapon then he spent thousands doing it AND the feds would know UNLESS he bought them illegally

Now it is possible to convert a semi automatic to a fully automatic but it isn’t easy and not everyone would know how to do it. Again he would have gone to great expense.

Hell this could be a lefty false flag to push gun control. After Obama’s/Holder and Fast and Furious nothing would surprise me.
 
Private William said:
guns are the last protection from slavery. it is the protector of the individual. It is how a single person wields their power. You, as a serf, look to others to protect you and feed you and coddle you. If you believe you are a truly free individual though, guns are necessary to protect your autonomy.
Click to expand...

Nah; that's not really it.
 
Thing1 said:
Nah; that's not really it.
Click to expand...

it absoultely is. if you take guns away, you take away an individuals autonomy. You said yourself you don't understand. I am helping you to understand. Guns exist to protect an individual from tyranny. It is the last stand.
 
Jarod said:
This whack job killed 50 people from two blocks away and from above down from the 32nd floor...


Can we all agree he should not have had access to a weapon capable causing this carnage?

I know the saying, guns don't kill people, but without access to such a weapon, he would never have been able to pull this off.
Click to expand...

The weapon he used was fully automatic, I can hear it on the videos, unless he had the right type of licensing it was illegal for him to have access to the weapons he used.
 
Private William said:
it absoultely is. if you take guns away, you take away an individuals autonomy. You said yourself you don't understand. I am helping you to understand. Guns exist to protect an individual from tyranny. It is the last stand.
Click to expand...

Nah. There are plenty of countries that don't have our gun culture/extreme gun worship, and they're just fine.
 
Private William said:
guns are the last protection from slavery. it is the protector of the individual. It is how a single person wields their power. You, as a serf, look to others to protect you and feed you and coddle you. If you believe you are a truly free individual though, guns are necessary to protect your autonomy.
Click to expand...

I am not against all guns, but do we need to be able to kill fifty people from two blocks away and 32 stories up?
 
Toxic Titties said:
According to you on other issues if the MAJORITY disagrees with you then that means you are wrong.

Therefore you are wrong.

PS

You cannot buy an automatic weapon without a special license from the federal gobblement. For all intents and purposes they are banned for most people.

If this guy truly used a fully automatic weapon then he spent thousands doing it AND the feds would know UNLESS he bought them illegally

Now it is possible to convert a semi automatic to a fully automatic but it isn’t easy and not everyone would know how to do it. Again he would have gone to great expense.

Hell this could be a lefty false flag to push gun control. After Obama’s/Holder and Fast and Furious nothing would surprise me.
Click to expand...

False, I never said that the majority is always right. Silly.
 
Damocles said:
The weapon he used was fully automatic, I can hear it on the videos, unless he had the right type of licensing it was illegal for him to have access to the weapons he used.
Click to expand...

IF that is true, the weapon was still manufactured in or imported to the Untied States, why is that allowed?
 
Jarod said:
I am not against all guns, but do we need to be able to kill fifty people from two blocks away and 32 stories up?
Click to expand...

Do we need cars that can drive 120 mph?

When you think about the number of guns owned in this country this is a relatively rare occurrence. Of course it gains national headlines so gullible people like you think it happens all the time.

Don’t be gullible
 
Toxic Titties said:
Do we need cars that can drive 120 mph?

When you think about the number of guns owned in this country this is a relatively rare occurrence. Of course it gains national headlines so gullible people like you think it happens all the time.

Don’t be gullible
Click to expand...

Again, automobiles are strictly regulated.
 
Liberals always claim they don’t want to ban guns then proceed to push policies that ban guns. Stop it already. You always lose on this issue. But you can’t help yourself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Thing1 said:
Possibly to an extent, but so is Grind's contention that guns are necessary to protect my "autonomy" and I need them to be a truly free individual.
Click to expand...

when the government threatens you with death daily for violating 'laws', using guns as their implicit threat, then yes, guns are the ONLY thing available to protect your individual freedom. Unless you're super ninja bruce lee, that is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top