50 dead and 200 wounded in Las Vegas shootings


The extent of planning in this massacre doesn't really fit the profile of a deranged shooter. He doesn't look like an ISIS sympathizer---but that doesn't mean anything any more.

My initial reaction was the target was all wrong for a right wing nut job.

Now ISIS is claiming the shooter was a recent convert/recruit. Now, the target makes better sense.

It could be ISIS propaganda, but who knows.
 
Sure, the ones that are legally bought...Do you think mass murderers tend to be honest law abiding citizens?

Did the Vegas shooter buy his legally -if he in fact used one?

Answer, Buckly.

Can you explain how more "gun control laws" are supposed to be effective, in light of the obvious conclusion?

I'll understand if you can't.

Sucks to be Buck. :rofl2:
 
The extent of planning in this massacre doesn't really fit the profile of a deranged shooter. He doesn't look like an ISIS sympathizer---but that doesn't mean anything any more.

My initial reaction was the target was all wrong for a right wing nut job.

Now ISIS is claiming the shooter was a recent convert/recruit. Now, the target makes better sense.

It could be ISIS propaganda, but who knows.

Like I said I can’t confirm it obviously but how many times does ISIS claim responsibility for things they don’t do?

As I predicted if it is true the lefties will run from this story. They won’t even try to pass gun control. They will protect muslimes
 
Cite your evidence for that assertion, please, my good person (I won't assume your gender; #virtue signaling).

Answer, Somad.



How so?

Answer, Somad.



Assuming that might be true - and even though you didn't cite any evidence to support such an assumption, are you arguing for the confiscation of firearms from all Americans because they might be stolen and misused by criminals?

Answer, Somad.



So? The law is the law, Somad. Constitutional law. You know the drill, don't you?



Interesting. I don't think you are entitled to decide what I may legally own based on your opinion of it's utility, Somad.

Can you explain what gives you that right? More to the point, why should I care, Somad?

Answer, Somad.



I wonder if the loved ones of the millions of victims of automobile misuse share your cavalier dismissal of the "problem associated with them". I suspect not.

Guns are an entrenched, necessary part of my every day life, Somad, and the need they fill is many times greater than any problem associated with them.

You earned it. It's a good look for you.

rustled-jimmies-9.jpg

"MY GOOD SIR."..
TOO FUCKING FUNNY!
 
Like I said I can’t confirm it obviously but how many times does ISIS claim responsibility for things they don’t do?

As I predicted if it is true the lefties will run from this story. They won’t even try to pass gun control. They will protect muslimes

I could be wrong but I don't think ISIS makes false claims in that regard.

If someone can prove me wrong, that's fine.
 
If you're going to assign pet names, Corazón, could you give humble mortals a clue as to which poster they are?

I do it too, but I hope my fond nicknames for the forum idiots are easier to match to the target. If not, feel free to let me know.

In plain English, who the fuck is NostraDC? :dunno:
Buckly aka Nostradumbcunt or Nostradumbarse.
 

Thank you. We'll see how the first one pans out.

The second one...ditto.

I've seen others trying to say that ISIS said they'd pull shit like this eventually. Not very credible, IMO.

Proactive blanket claims of responsibility for unspecified future events are dubious, at best. I leave that kind of thinking to DEMOCRATS.
 
I could be wrong but I don't think ISIS makes false claims in that regard.

If someone can prove me wrong, that's fine.

Dude, you should at least TRY to google for some quick research before your usual "I don't think/I think" proclamations based on nothing.

ISIS has a long, proud history of falsely claiming responsibility for attacks. It's a big part of what they do.
 
Dude, you should at least TRY to google for some quick research before your usual "I don't think/I think" proclamations based on nothing. ISIS has a long, proud history of falsely claiming responsibility for attacks. It's a big part of what they do.

Dude, let's see your Googled research that substantiates the claim that "ISIS has a long, proud history of falsely claiming responsibility for attacks, and it's a big part of what they do."

I'll understand if you can't provide it, and I will draw a certain conclusion from that, little Thingy. Can you guess what that will be?
 
Dude, you should at least TRY to google for some quick research before your usual "I don't think/I think" proclamations based on nothing.

ISIS has a long, proud history of falsely claiming responsibility for attacks. It's a big part of what they do.

I know for a fact you're no authority on the subject.
 
Back
Top