Dear Mrs. trump

Sadly, you missed the glaringly obvious point. Here....see how angry Conservatives get when money is spent on education. An educated electorate doesn't vote Republican. Lest we forget the infamous words of the worst POTUS in our nation's history: "I love the undereducated"


Abstract:[FONT="] [/FONT]President Obama’s FY 2013 budget request includes another major spending increase for the Department of Education—2.5 percent more than last year—to nearly $70 billion. American taxpayers are calling for spending restraint in Washington, yet President Obama’s proposals would exacerbate the existing bureaucratic maze of federal programs and further remove educational decision-making authority from state and local policymakers

http://www.heritage.org/budget-and-...budget-and-blueprint-costly-expansion-federal




[h=1]President Obama's 2017 Budget Seeks to Expand Educational Opportunity for All Students[/h]
https://www.ed.gov/news/press-relea...s-expand-educational-opportunity-all-students


[h=1]President Trump's Budget Proposal Calls For Deep Cuts To Education[/h]
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017...get-proposal-calls-for-deep-cuts-to-education

No, YOU missed the point. The government does not create better education. It begins at home with a mother & father actively participating in engaging with kids' homework assignments, going over the lessons the kid had that day, checking their comprehension, using math and spelling flash cards all through grammar school every single night to make sure it's committed to memory instead of calculators and spell-check, getting the kid to memorize state and country capitals along with identifying all countries on a map or world atlas that every kid should have, last but not least making sure the kid actually gets up and ATTENDS school.

Libs replies here could always make it easier for themselves the next 8 years. Simply equate Trump to anything you don't like :)
Trump=NFL
Trump=Puerto Rico
Trump=Dr. Seuss
Trump=education
Trump=tax cuts
Trump=healthcare
Trump=free speech
Trump=weather
Trump=Russia
Trump=cops
Trump=tweets
Trump=hair
Trump=golf
Trump=well done steak..................
 
Last edited:
Okay Stretch, I read the entire letter and agree with you and everyone that the racism angle is batshit crazy. So what I've concluded is: neither you, me, Melania or the Obamas think the book is racist and should be banned from schools. And that it's still dishonest to bring Michelle into an argument that's between Melania and Liz because as far as we know, Michelle never spoke out against any Seuss book.

"Michelle never spoke out against any Seuss book."

Which was exactly the point of the irony here.:palm:
 
Who knows. All we know is this librarian dressed up as a Seuss character in 2005 with no repercussions.

You see, Seuss only became rayciss after Trump was inaugurated. :rolleyes:

Here's a rare shot of GEOTUS educating a liberal:



yl33vja7d0pz.png
 
Are you assuming that everyone must only buy alcohol when they dine out because that's what you do, snowflake?

Are you assuming that everyone must only drink milk out of a carton at home because that's what you do, snowflake?

That kind of thinking is called the fallacy of assumed similarity, snowflake.

Yes to both.
 
Facts, experience and evidence trump your weak virtue signaling, snowflake. I am a winner because I backed Trump. You are not, and that is a fact.

It's not virtue signaling when it's true. Who knows, maybe at least one Trumptard will come along and indicate that they disagree with you on these things.
 
"Michelle never spoke out against any Seuss book."

Which was exactly the point of the irony here.:palm:

Typing slowly here. "Michelle-never-spoke-out-against-Seuss-books-because-she-didn't-think-they-were-racist-or-any-other "-ist."

There is no irony here except in your mind. Michelle isn't part of the controversy and she didn't put in her two cents' worth about it. Only one person made the claim of racism, that person was Liz Soeiro, and Liz Soeiro doesn't speak for Michelle. Furthermore, and let me be perfectly clear, I didn't criticize Melania for sending those books to Soeiro.

Your claims are nothing but another tired attempt to deflect from trump's sorry PR response by bringing an Obama into a trump fight, and sensible people understand this.
 
Who knows. All we know is this librarian dressed up as a Seuss character in 2005 with no repercussions.

Repercussions from who, the students? The parents? The school district?

Again... Soeiro acted badly over these books but it has nothing to do with Michelle Obama.
 
Typing slowly here. "Michelle-never-spoke-out-against-Seuss-books-because-she-didn't-think-they-were-racist-or-any-other "-ist." There is no irony here except in your mind. Michelle isn't part of the controversy and she didn't put in her two cents' worth about it. Only one person made the claim of racism, that person was Liz Soeiro, and Liz Soeiro doesn't speak for Michelle. Furthermore, and let me be perfectly clear, I didn't criticize Melania for sending those books to Soeiro. Your claims are nothing but another tired attempt to deflect from trump's sorry PR response by bringing an Obama into a trump fight, and sensible people understand this.

You really are dumb, aren't you?

Did anybody say that Obama's Amazon said anything about the books being rayciss?

Did anybody say Obama's Amazon sent the books to our fellow SJW the liberal librarian?

Your fellow SJW the liberal librarian didn't seem to think Seuss was rayciss until the former FLOTUS flounced out of the White House.

That's hypocrisy you can appreciate, isn't it, Christiecrite?

Answer, Christiecrite. :rofl2:
 
44E289A300000578-0-image-m-35_1506777737156.jpg


Many users feigned shock that Michelle Obama had 'supported racist books' although the Obamas have not weighed in on the controversy, which centers solely around Soeiro

Sarcasm is wasted on the stupid. I mean Y O U, Christiecrite.

Are you playing dumb, or are you genuinely retarded, Christiecrite?

Answer, Christiecrite. :rofl2:
 
Back
Top